June 2022, № 3 (235), pages 52-59doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-233-52
Ryndak V.G., Samofal A.S., Kapaeva A.A. DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN EDUCATION THEORY AND SOCIAL PRACTICE OF PROFESSION INSTITUTIONALIZATIONThe essence of the definition of “profession” is multifaceted and ambiguous. There is a need to study the work of scientists in various fields: sociologists, economics, education. The concept of “profession” is an integral category of research. According to the results of a theoretical study, several main aspects can be distinguished that characterize the concept of “profession”: “this is a kind of labor activity” and “the presence of special knowledge and skills”. The development of the essence of this definition is noticeable. Initially, it was interpreted as a type (type) of activity, then it becomes a type of activity that requires special training, the presence of certain knowledge and skills. A profession combines a group of related specialties. They are aimed at achieving more particular or intermediate results or at achieving general results by specific means. The mechanisms for designing a model of vocational education are determined: social dialogue between employees, employers and the state; methods for forecasting skills needs; obtaining reliable and timely information on labor markets; normatively fixed contractual relations for the fulfillment of obligations. The most significant for the profession, modern students call such professional qualities as: purposefulness, stress resistance, sociability, ability to work in multitasking mode.Key words: the concept of «profession», profession institutionalization, theory of education and social practice of profession institutionalization in Russia and abroad.
References:
1. Ivanenko I.A. Konceptualizaciya professional’nogo obrazovaniya [Conceptualization of vocational education]. Ufa: RIC Bashgu, 2013. 104 p.
2. Warner W.L. The Living and the Dead. New Haven,1959.
3. Warner W.L., Lunt P.S. The social life of a modern community. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1941. P. 90.
4. Blau P. M., Duncan O. D., Tyree A. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley and Sons — 1967.
5. Featherman D.L., Hauser P.M. A Refined model of Occupational Mobility. -N.Y. -1978.
6. James N. Baron, David B. Grusky, Donald J. Treiman Social Differentiation and Social Inequality. — N.Y. — 1996
7. Lenski G., Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966. P. 495.
8. Edwards A.M. A Social-Economic Grouping of the Gainful Workers of the United States. J. Amer: Stataist. Assoc. 1993.
9. Mezhdunarodnyj simpozium “Istoricheskoe professiovedenie: professii i trud v rossijskoj istorii” [International Symposium “Historical Profession Studies: professions and work in Russian history”]. Available at: http://occupations.asu.ru /?q=node/5
10. Edited by Vladimirov V.N. Istoricheskoe professionovedenie [Historical professionology]. Barnaul: Publishing house Alt. Un-ta, 2004, p. 208.
11. Coles M., Oleinikova O.N., Muravyeva A.A. Nacional’naya sistema kvalifikacij na rynke truda [National system of qualifications in the labor market]. Moscow: A.M.Konyaev RIOTK. 2009, p. 9.
12. Korableva G.B. Formation of approaches to the sociology of professions in Russia. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological research]. 2013. №1(345). Pp. 109 -117.
13. Ivanenko I. A. Institutionalization of professions in social practice and theory of education. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya [The world of science, culture, education]. 2010. №6-1(25). Pp. 72-75.
14. Simonova N. B. Journalism. institutionalization of the profession at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries: global trends and Russian specifics. Vestnik NGU [Bulletin of the NSU]. Series: History, Philology. 2020. No.6. pp. 33-47.
15. Angelovsky A. A. Analysis of the concepts of profession, professional consciousness, professional activity, professionalism. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra RAN [Izvestiya Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 2010. No. 5-2. pp. 306-314.
16. Tsvyk V.A. Category “Professionalism” and its methodological significance. Vestnik RUDN [Bulletin of the RUDN]. Series: Sociology. 2009. No. 3. pp. 69-77.
17. Romashevskaya N.I., Kozyreva O.A., Yudnikov I.L. Models of socialization and self-realization of students in the context of their professional and pedagogical interaction. Pedagogicheskoe masterstvo: materialy I Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Moskva, aprel’ 2012 g.)[Pedagogical mastery: materials of the I International Scientific Conference (Moscow, April 2012)]. Moscow: Buki-Vedi, 2012. pp. 38-40.
18. Abramov R. N. Sociology of professions. Ekonomicheskaya sociologiya [Economic sociology]. 2003. No.3. pp.159-166.
19. Radaev V.V., Shkaratan O.I. Social’naya stratifikaciya: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij [Social stratification: A textbook for higher educational institutions]. M.: Nauka. 1995. p. 240.
21. Vvedensky V. N. Institutionalization as a methodological basis for the development of the pedagogical profession. CHelovek i obrazovanie [Man and education]. 2005. No. 1. pp. 25-27.
22. Maksimova L.N. Formation of sociology of professions in foreign science. Kazanskaya nauka [Kazan Science]. 2012. No. 3. pp. 348-350.
23. Ryndak V. G. ZHenshchina XXI veka: strategiya uspekha: monografiya [Woman of the XXI century: strategy of success: monograph]. Moscow: Novella, 2011. 318 p.
About this article
Authors: Ryndak V.G., Samofal A.S., Kapaeva A.A.
Year: 2022
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-233-52
|