November 2024, № 4 (244), pages 83-91

1. «ANTI–PLAGIARISM» is the main nightmare of the author of the dissertation (2021). Universitetskaya kniga, No. 5, pp. 54-58.

2. Abrarov R. D., Hudajberganova M. M. (2016) How does anti-plagiarism work? The principle of anti-plagiarism. Molodoj uchenyj, No. 29-3(133), pp. 1-2.

3. Gel’man V. Ya. (2020) Problems of the formal-mechanistic approach to the identification of plagiarism in scientific works. Ekonomika nauki, No. 6 (3), pp.180–185.

4. Gorelikov S. Yu. (2018) Anti-plagiarism” – filter or brake? Nauka i Shkola, No. 6, pp. 201–204

5. Gorodnyanskaya K. A., Zelenskaya E. D. (2018) On the issue of anti-plagiarism of the basic terminology of labor law. Yuridicheskie nauki, No. 12. URL: http://novaum.ru/public/p619

6. Avdeeva N. V. [at all] (2018) The permissible amount of borrowing as a problem of the organization of scientific activity and its quality control. Otkrytoe obrazovanie, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 74-83.

7. Zajcev V. V., Mihajlova I. A. (2022) Requirements for the originality of scientific works and scientific works performed “on order”: issues of theory and practice. Monitoring pravoprimeneniya, No. 2 (43), pp. 86–93.

8. Kulikova E. Yu. (2016) Stolen Science: Why Plagiarism and self-plagiarism are unacceptable. Vestnik Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo medicinskogo universiteta, No. 6, pp. 50–53.

9. Makeeva A. [at all] (2020) Incorrect borrowings in Russian doctoral dissertations: how much, where and from whom? Mir Rossii, No. 2, pp. 27–48.

10. Belen’kaya O. S., Strelkova I. B., Filippova O. A., Chekhovich Yu. V. (2021) Methodological recommendations for the expert assessment of the originality of dissertation texts in the “Anti-Plagiarism” system. Sankt-Peterburg : Lan’, 92 p.

11. Morozov A. V. (2023) The legality of the requirements for evaluating the originality of scientific papers. Voprosy sovre-mennoj nauki i praktiki, No. 1(8), pp. 39-43.

12. Ostrovskaya A. S. (2016) Plagiarism in the 21st century: who needs it? Voprosy sovremennoj pediatrii, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 148-153.

13. Pavlov A. A. (2020) On the use by the authors of scientific texts of technical techniques that distort the results of checking the uniqueness of texts. Review of the problem, experience in identifying and analyzing similar texts. Nauchnaya periodika: problemy i resheniya, Tom 9, No. 3-4, 10 p.

14. Byval’cev V. A. [at all] (2017) Plagiarism and academic integrity in science. Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii medicinskih nauk, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 299-304.

15. Ponkin I. V. (2023) The question of the originality of the scientific text and the defectiveness of the program shells of the “Antiplagiat” systems. Pravo i obrazovanie, No. 7, pp. 12–19.

16. Strelkova I. B. (2019) Expert assessment of the originality of scientific works using the “Anti-Plagiarism” system in the structure of the formation of academic literacy of young researchers. Vyshejshaya shkola: navukova-metadychny і publіcystychny chasopіs, No. 5(133), pp. 3-7.

17. Usacheva E. A. (2019) On the question of the permissibility of using the “Anti-Plagiarism” system to determine authorship and evaluate the originality of a work. Obrazovanie i pravo, No. 4, pp. 204–210.

18. Shahraj S. M., Arister N. I., Tedeev A. A. (2015) About plagiarism in works of science (dissertations for the degree). Moscow, Moskovskij islamskij institut, 192 p.

19. Shinkarenko V. I., Kuropyatnik E. S. (2017) Problems of plagiarism detection and analysis of software tools to solve them. Nauka ta progres transport, No. 1(67), pp. 131-142.

About this article