June 2022, № 3 (235), pages 101-109

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-233-101

Sazonova T.V. PRINCIPLES FOR THE TRANSFORMATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION: CONTENT ANALYSIS AND REGIONAL EXPERIENCEAnalysis of the principles of transformation of higher education has become relevant in connection with global changes in the socio-cultural, geopolitical and economic situations. At the state level, a set of key principles of the new national system of higher education is presented. The complex includes the principles of ensuring technological sovereignty, openness, fundamentality, practicality and flexibility. To date, interpretations of synonymous / analogous principles of education have been established, a resource of knowledge and ideas of their effectiveness has been accumulated. In a number of cases, they were considered as informal criteria for the quality of higher education, implicitly manifested in the rationale for programs and training plans, in educational projects as “options” for the successful achievements of the national higher education.
A comparative analysis of the current interpretations of the key principles determined their differences from the previously known ones not so much in their meaningful interpretation, but in the level of demand and the nature of the generating factors — socio-economic, geopolitical, cultural-historical, production-but-technological. The key principles for the transformation of higher education represent a concentrate of the country’s challenges and requests for domestic higher education. The research methods were analysis of normative documents, comparative and critical analysis of scientific publications, synthesis of scientific opinions and professional education experience, formulation and proof of scientific hypotheses. As materials for the study, normative and legislative documents of the Russian Federation, publications of leading scientists in the field of educational policy, and experience in educational activities were used. The attention of the scientific and pedagogical community is drawn to some mechanisms for their implementation in domestic regional universities and their branches. The experience of the development of the Orenburg State University and the Kumertau branch is shown in terms of the implementation of key principles. Transformation of education is impossible without programmatic state support, without relying on the resources of stakeholders, actively attracting opportunities and funds from grants and the program of the Federal level.Key words: transformation of education, key principles, technological sovereignty, openness, fundamentality, practicality, flexibility, university ecosystem.

Download

References:

1. Ryzhova I. M. Technological sovereignty, education and science — factors of national security of the Russian Federation (V. V. Putin). Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Social’no-gumanitarnye issledovaniya i tekhnologii [Scientific research and development. Socio-humanitarian research and technology], 2021, vol. 10, no. 2, pр. 88-91.

2. Frenkel A.A., Tikhomirov B.I., Surkov A.A. 2021: Stagflation or technological sovereignty — nothing else!. Ekonomicheskie strategii [Economic strategies], 2022, vol. 24, no. 2 (182), pp. 86-91.

3. Mironov A.V. Priority principles for the development of modern Russian education. Social’no-gumanitarnye znaniya [Social and humanitarian knowledge], 2010, no. 6, pр. 28-45.

4. Karpov A.O. Fundamental models of education of the future. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 2022, no. 1, pр. 54-64.

5. Ed. Batysheva S.Ya., Novikov A.M. Professional’naya pedagogika: Uchebnik dlya studentov, obuchayushchihsya po pedagogicheskim special’nostyam i napravleniyam [Professional pedagogy: A textbook for students studying in pedagogical specialties and areas]. 3rd edition, revised. M.: Iz-vo EGVES, 2009, 456 p.

6. Gasanov E.A., Zubarev A.E. Principles of integration of universities into the global space of higher education and neo-industrial development. Vestnik Tihookeanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Pacific State University], 2019, no. 3 (54), pр. 35-46.

7. Sokolov V.I. What do we call open education? Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovacii [Modern scientific research and innovation], 2011, no. 1 Available at: https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2011/05/63.

8. Pavlova, I. A. University in the regional innovation system: roles, functions, interactions: on the example of the Tomsk region. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis: 08.00.05. Institute of Economics and Organization of Industrial Production of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Tomsk, 2016, 27 p.

9. Secundo G., Perez S.E., Martinaitis Ћ., leitnerk.H. An Intellectual Capital framework tomeasure universities’ third mission activities. Technological Forecasting & Social Change.2017. Vol. 123. P. 229–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.013

10. Guseva A.I., Kalashnik V.M., Kaminsky V.I., Kireev S.V. Analysis of the activities of groups of universities on the track “Territorial and sectoral leadership” of the program “Priority-2030”. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia], 2022, vol. 31, no. 4, pр. 9–28.

11. Gasanov E.A., Zubarev A.E. Principles of integration of universities into the global space of higher education and neo-industrial development. Vestnik Tihookeanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Pacific State University], 2019, no. 3 (54), pр. 35-46.

12. Miroshnikov S.A. Orenburg State University in the conditions of transformation. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia], 2021, vol. 30, no. 8-9, pр. 105-114.

13. Gitelman L. D., Sandler D. G., Kozhevnikov M. V., Tretyakov V. S. Technological platform as a tool for transforming scientific and educational activities at the university. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University management: practice and analysis], 2015, no. 4 (98), pр. 31-42.

14. Novikov S.V. Structure, main drivers and trends in the development of the innovative ecosystem of a modern university. Ekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal [Economics and management: a scientific and practical journal], 2021, no. 2 (158), pр. 41-49.

15. Belonovskaya I. D., Petukhova T. P., Kovalev A. V. On the design of professional educational programs in the system “college — university”. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia], 2012, no. 7, pр. 72-78.

About this article

Author: Sazonova T.V.

Year: 2022

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-233-101

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru