|
|
|
June 2021, № 3 (231), pages 94-99doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-231-94
Akhmedyanova G.F., Pishchukhin A.M. ANALYSIS OF BARRIER RESTRICTIONS IN THE ASSIMILATION AND PRESENTATION OF KNOWLEDGE BY A STUDENT AT A UNIVERSITYIn this work, on the basis of a systematic approach, the barriers of the student at the university are analyzed, which hinder both the deep assimilation of knowledge and their worthy presentation at various levels of control. A multilevel model representation of the learning process allows you to identify bottlenecks and outline ways to eliminate the identified barriers. However, as this analysis shows, the most serious barriers, as well as a large number of them, are still in the minds of students, therefore, almost all pedagogical means of overcoming these barriers become indirect, convincing, and motivating. On the other hand, it is possible to imagine, of course, punishments, the main of which is the deprivation of the scholarship. Several levels of professional knowledge transfer have been identified, depending on the pedagogical means by which this is carried out. So theoretical knowledge is transmitted through lectures, skills are acquired in practical classes and laboratory work, and finally, skills are developed in work with elements of creativity: essays, term papers, final qualification works. The transferred knowledge is then compared with the results of control procedures at the corresponding levels, and only then the degree of development of competencies and the general competence of the student at the highest level are determined. Accordingly, corrective actions from the upper levels will depend on the results obtained. It is important for the learning process that there are objective and subjective barriers. The first group of barriers is associated with students with disabilities and persons with disabilities. Since there is an arsenal of special pedagogical tools for their training (inclusive education), only subjective barriers are investigated in the work.Key words: Multilevel presentation, learner barriers, systems analysis, competencies, model of the learning process
References:
1. Ivanova V.P., Yurchenko M.G. On the question of the advisability of referring to the “competence-based approach” and the “competence-based model” of a graduate of a higher school. Bulletin of Science and Practice. 2020.Vol. 6. No. 5. pp. 471-478.
2. Drozdova, N.V., Oleks, M.N. Structural-dynamic model of the formation of a constructive strategy for overcoming psychological barriers by a student in educational activities. // Education and self-development. 2015. No. 4 (46). pp. 39-42.
3. Kaverzneva, T.T. University students’ education by means of online technologies. /T.T. Kaverzneva, N.A. Leonova, C.V. Pshenichnaya, S.A. Sogonov, D.A. Lisachenko // Education and Science Journal. 2020. Vol. 22. No. 7. pp. 125-147.
4. Akhmedyanova, G.F., Pishchukhin, A.M. Fundamentals of multilevel management in organizational and technical systems: monograph. — Orenburg: OSU publishing house. — 2020. -162 pp. — ISBN 978-5-7410-2488-1.
5. Akhmedyanova, G. Concepts of oeuvre and algorithmization in modern engineering education // Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 2020. — Vol. 172. — pp. 911-917.
6. Pishchukhin, A.M., Akhmedyanova, G.F. Methodology for assessing the effectiveness of pedagogical tools / All-Russian n / a conference “Modernization of pedagogical education in the context of the global educational agenda.” Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University named after K. Minin. 2015. pp.105-108.
7. Akhmedyanova G.F., Pishchukhin A.M. The system of computer support for the process of diagnostic assessment of the student’s competence level. // Bulletin of the Orenburg State University. 2018. No. 2 (214). pp. 12-19.
8. Akhmedyanova, G.F. On the systematization of the organization of student-teacher feedback // Bulletin of the Orenburg State University. — 2013. — No. 2. — pp. 12-17
9. Manina, V.A., Mugil, Yu.V., Spasenkova, S.V. Psychological and pedagogical conditions for overcoming psychological barriers among rural students in the process of studying at a university. // Psychologist. 2020. No. 2. pp. 57-69.
10. Vasilyeva, I.V. Psychological barriers of poorly performing students in educational activities. // Electronic scientific journal. 2020. No. 7 (36). pp. 222-224.
11. Guremina, N.V. Overcoming the difficulties of teaching students of the psychological and pedagogical magistracy on the basis of project and creative activities. // Problems of higher education. 2019.No. 1. pp. 368-370.
12. Abramova, I.E. Overcoming barriers in teaching efl to non-linguistic students / I.E Abramova, A.V. Ananyina, O.M. Sherehova, E.P. Shishmolina // Education and Self-Development. 2020.Vol. 15. No. 2. pp. 10-20.
13. Podymov, N.A., Zhang, L., Ngo, T.N. Psychological barriers in the educational and professional activities of students. // Problems of modern education. 2018.No. 3. pp. 35-46.
14. Kotova, K.D., Pepeliaev, M.N., Firsova, A.A. The reasons for the emergence of individual psychological barriers in the process of studying at a university. // Modern trends in the development of science and technology. 2016. No. 3-11. pp. 70-72.
15. Sagitova, V.R. Psychological barriers through the prism of the difficulties of the educational process of the university. // Advances in modern science. 2016.Vol. 5.No. 9. pp. 123-125.
16. Arutyunov, G.P. and other Methods of practical skills. basic difficulties, student’s view. / G.P. Arutyunov, A.K. Rylova, D.V. Polyakov, D.A. Sigunova, M.A. Ivanova // Collection of Humanitarian Studies. 2021. No. 2 (27). pp. 52-66.
17. Avdeeva, A.P., Safonova, Yu.A. Socio-psychological barriers to communication of students with hearing impairments in the inclusive educational environment of the university. // Science and Education: scientific publication of the Moscow State Technical University. N.E. Bauman. 2016. No. 7. pp. 345-351.
18. Shakurov, R.Kh. Barrier as a category and its role in activity // Questions of psychology. 2001. No. 1. pp. 3–18.
19. Zamirbekova, G.Z. Adaptation of students to study at a higher educational institution: difficulties, problems, solutions. // Issues of sustainable development of society. 2021. No. 7. pp. 555-559.
20. Biktimirova, L.R. Psychological features of students’ adaptation to the difficulties of studying at a university. // Acmeology. 2016. No.1. pp. 46.
21. Galai, I.A., Lebedev, A.V., Aizman, R.I. The specificity of socio-psychological adaptation of students of pedagogical university in the city and district center. // International Journal of Development Research. 2020.Vol. 10. No. 3. pp. 34254-34258.
22. Nikulina, N.N. Problems of social adaptation of bachelor, s degree students of pedagogical field under the conditions of study in agrarian university. / N.N. Nikulina, I.V. Gordienko, I.A. Belozerova, N.I. Lyubimova, M.G. Davityan // International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology. 2019. Vol. 9. No. 2. pp. 2036-2042.
23. Gardanova, J.R., Manin, V.A. The relationship between the ability to overcome psychological barriers to learning and the level of resilience of students. // Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology. 2021. No. 1 (54). pp. 81-89.
About this article
Authors: Ahmedyanova G.F., Pishchuhin A.M.
Year: 2021
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-231-94
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|