november 20, 2024

RU/EN

Headings of Vestnik

June 2021, № 3 (231), pages 32-42

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-231-32

Drobotenko Yu.B., Nazarova N.A. THE REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL CONCEPTIONS ABOUT THE FORMATION OF LEARNERS’ FUNCTIONAL LITERACYThe development of learners’ functional literacy is one of the most urgent issues in modern education. The interrelationship between the quality of general education and the level of functional literacy formation is substantiated in pedagogical researches and reflected in the international assessment results of learners’ educational achievements (PISA) and the provisions of the normative documents that determine educational policy in the country, critically comprehended and meaningfully interpreted by experts in the fields of pedagogy, psychology, sociology, etc.
The aim of the article is to provide an overview of the basic psychological and pedagogical concepts of learners’ functional literacy formation, reflecting different approaches to the formation process of all its components (content, procedural, resultative).
The article describes personalityoriented, activitybased, contextcompetence concepts that allow to present the process and results of students’ functional literacy formation in a holistic way. The authors of the article also distinguish: searchcreative and reproductivealgorithmic concepts that characterize the features of the procedural aspect of the functional literacy formation; a participatory concept, the leading idea of which is the development of functional literacy, considering life experience, as well as cultural and individual characteristics of students; the concept of a comprehensive assessment showing the necessity of considering the multicomponent structure and multiple contexts of functional literacy while assessing the level of its formation; an innovative and infrastructure concept that focuses on the necessity of the school infrastructure development which would create the conditions for the functional literacy formation.
The article was prepared within the fundamental research of State Assignment implementation on the topic “Methodological and linguodidactic basics for the functional literacy formation of schoolchildren as a condition for improving the quality of general education” (Supplementary Agreement of the Ministry of Education of Russia and the Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education “OMSPU” No. 073032021027/2).Key words: functional literacy, students, educational achievements, psychological and pedagogical concepts, aspects of functional literacy formation.

Download

References:

1. Basyuk V.S., Kovaleva G.S. Innovatsionnyi proekt Ministerstva prosveshcheniya “Monitoring formirovaniya funktsionalnoi gramotnosti”: osnovnye napravleniya i pervye resultaty // Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika. 2019. Tom. 1, № 4 (61). S. 13-33.

2. Bershadskaya M.B. Funktsionalnaya gramotnost shkolnikov i problemy vysshei shkoly // Otechestvennye zapiski — 2012. — №4 (49). — S. 122-130.

3. Ermolenko V.A. Funktsionalnaya gramotnost v sovremennom kontekste. — M.: ITOP RAO, 2002. — 119 s.

4. Gershunskiy B.S. Gramotnost dlya XXI veka // Pedagogika Rossii. — 2010. № 4. S. 54-68.

5. Lebedev O.E. Obrazovannost uchashchikhsya kak tsel obrazovaniya i obrazovatelnyi resultat // Kontrol kachestva i otsenka v obrazovanii: Materialy mezhd. konf. SPb.: Izd-vo RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena, 2003. S. 113-129.

6. Leontiev A.A. Ot psikhologii chteniya k psikhologii obucheniya chteniyu // Materialy 5-y Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii (26-28 marta 2001): v 2 ch. — Ch.1 pod red. I.V. Usachevoi. — M., 2002. S. 5-8.

7. Makovskaya E.N. Ispolzovanie partisipativnogo pedagogicheskogo vzaimodeistviya dlya adaptatsii studentov k uchebnomu protsessu v vuze // Aktualnye problem gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2017. — №5-2. S. 68-71.

8. Nazarova N.A. Razvitie funktsionalnoi gramotnosti studentov pedagogicheskogo vuza v usloviyakh gumanitarizatsii obrazovatelnogo protsessa: diss….kand-ta pedag. nauk : 13.00.08 : Om. gos. ped. un-t. — Omsk, 2007. — 239 s.

9. Novikov A.M. Problemy gumanitarizatsii professionalnogo obrazovaniya // Pedagogica. — 2000. — № 9. — S. 3-10.

10. Senognoeva N.A., Romanova O.V. Kriterii formirovaniya funktsionalnoi gramotnosti i klyuchevye kompetentsii XXI veka // Sovremennaya nauka: aktualnye problem teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Gumanitarnye Nauki. — 2019. №09. S. 99-104.

11. Universalnye kompetentnosti i Novaya gramotnost: ot lozungov k realnosti / pod red. M.S. Dobryakovoi, I.D. Frumina; pri uchastii K.A. Barannikova, N. Ziila, Dzh. Moss, I.M. Remorenko, Ya. Khatumyaki; Nats. issled. un-t “Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki”. — M.: Izd. Dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2020. — 472 s.

12. Formirovanie i otsenka funktsionalnoi gramotnosti uchashchikhsya: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie / I.Yu. Aleksashina, O.A. Abdulaeva, Yu.P. Kiselev; nauch. red. I.Yu. Aleksashina. — SPb.: KARO, 2019. — 160 s. — (Peterburgskii vector vvedeniya FGOS OOO).

13. Forsait 2025: transformatsiya bakalavrskikh program, opyt Stenfordskogo universiteta [Elektronnyi resurs]. — https://kpfu.ru/portal/docs/F_1516133873/Transformaciya.bakalavrskikh.programm..Opyt.Stenfordskogo.universiteta.pdf

14. Shutova I.V. Metodika otsenivaniya funktaionalnoi gramotnosti uchashchikhsya v protsese obucheniya khimii: Diss…. kand. ped. nauk: 13.00.02. — SPb., 2003. — 183 s.

15. Gaudino, E.A., Matheson, L.N. & Mael, F.A. (2001). Development of the Functional Assessment Taxonomy. J Occup Rehabil, 11, 155–175 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013022410767

16. Gaughran, W., Waldmann, T., & Seery, N. (2006, June). A Participative Pedagogical Approach To Knowledge Comprehension Based On Students Preferential Learning Styles Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. DOI: 10.18260/1-2—1294

17. Nichols T. Ph. (2020). Innovation from Below: Infrastructure, Design, and Equity in Literacy Classroom Makerspaces. Research in the Teaching of English, 55 (1), 56-81.

18. Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39 (2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1

19. Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Teaching for creativity: The sounds of silence. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9 (2), 115–117.

20. Csernoch M., Birу P. (2015). The power in digital literacy and algorithmic skill. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 550-559.

About this article

Authors: Drobotenko Yu.B., Nazarova N.A.

Year: 2021

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-231-32

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru