June 2020, № 3 (226), pages 34-43doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-226-34
Noskov E. A. SUBSTANTIATION OF STUDENTS’ COMPETENCE LEVELSIN ENSURING NATIONAL SECURITY IN EDUCATIONThe lack of a generally accepted approach to methods for assessing the formation of students’ competences and learning outcomes, the multidirectional views on the development of pedagogical measuring materials for assessing competences, a technology for assessing educational achievements based on a competency-based approach indicate the relevance of this problem. The competence of a specialist in ensuring national security in education is understood as a combination of knowledge on the main content of ensuring national security; skills in implementing the means of ensuring national security in education; experience in the implementation of knowledge and skills in the field of basic content and implementation of means of ensuring national security. The competences that are necessary for a future specialist in ensuring national security can be divided into three levels: reproductive, local levels and the one that models professional activities. Requirements for knowledge and skills, as well as experience in professional activities with regard to the national security in education, have been developed for each level. A student who has reached the initial level knows how to formulate thoughts, interact and hold a dialogue with other subjects of the educational process, but these skills are manifested to a small extent. A student who has reached an average level is characterized by the need to obtain a future profession, learn, master new knowledge in the field of national security in education, by the ability to consciously put his/her skills into practice. A high level indicates the mastery of systemic knowledge with a personal meaning, the ability to implement the knowledge and skills gained, the use of professional experience. The level-based approach to assessing the formation of students’ competences allows determining the degree of future specialists’ readiness for professional activities in the field of national security in education.Key words: level-based approach, competence level, competences in the field of national security in education.
References:
1. Abdullina O.A. General pedagogical training of teachers in the system of higher pedagogical education. Moskow, Prosveshchenie. 1990. 141 p..
2. Asmolov A.G., Burmenskaya G.V., Volodarskaya I.A., Karabanova O.A., Molchanov S.V., Salmina N.G. Designing universal educational actions in high school. National psychological journal. 2011. V 1(5) Pp. 104-110
3.Bespal’ko V. P., Tatur Yu. G Systematic and methodological support of the educational process of training specialists. Moskow, Vysshaya shkola. 1989. 144 p.
4. Bilousova, L. Pedagogical Diagnostics with Use of Computer Technologies / L. Bilousova, O. Kolgatin1, L. Kolgatina1 // Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications: Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer Kherson, Ukraine, June 19–22, 2013. Pp. 209–220
5. Borytko N. M. Professional and pedagogical competence of a teacher. Internet-zhurnal “Ejdos”.2007. 30 September. http://www.eidos.ru/journal/2007/0930-10.htm
6. Golub G.B., Kogan E.Ya., Fishman I.S. Assessment of the level of formation of key professional competencies of UNPO graduates: approaches and procedures. Education issues. 2008. № 2. Pp. 161-184
7. Great Soviet Encyclopedia https://gufo.me/dict/bse/%D0%9E%D0%BF%D1%8B%D1%82
8. Kiseleva V. P. Assessment of students’ learning outcomes based on the results of FEPO: a competency-based approach. Assessment of students’ competencies and learning results in accordance with the requirements of the Federal state educational system: Materials of the III all-Russian scientific and practical conference. Moscow, 2012 Pp.31–34
9. Ksenofontova A.N., Ledeneva A.V. Methodological foundations of modern education. Bulletin of Orenburg state University. October. 2019, № 5 (223). P. 40-45
10. Litvinov V.A. On the issue of assessing the formation of students ‘ competencies during the intermediate and final certification. Modern education. 2019. № 1. Pp. 85 — 91. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8736.2019.1.25638 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=25638
11. Miroshin D.G. Assessment of the level of formation of professional competencies of students in technical disciplines. Modern pedagogy. 2015. № 2 URL: http://pedagogika.snauka.ru/2015/02/3313
12. Modern dictionary of foreign words. Moscow: Russian language. 1993. 740 p.
13. Modern explanatory dictionary of the Russian language.Editor-in-Chief S. A. Kuznetsov. Moscow: Reader’s Digest, 2004. 960 p.
14. Ozhegov S.I. i Shvedova N.Yu. Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language: 80,000 words and phraseological expressions /Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow, Azbukovnik. 1999. 944 p.
15. Pechnikov A. N., Prenzov A. V. Approach to assessing the formation of special competencies. Education and science. 2017, V. 19, № 5. Pp. 28–54.
16. Rihter T.V. Levels of formation professional competences of students of the higher school. Naukovij zhurnal Fiziko-matematichna osvita: naukovij zhurnal. 2016. V. 2(8). P. 99-102
17. Russian quality assessment system in education / V. Bolotov [etc.]. Russian Education and Society. 2015. V. 57. №7. Pp. 531–571
18. Tryapicyna A.P. Development of professional competence of students in the study of academic disciplines // Pedagogical science and modern education^ collection of articles of the II International scientific and practical conference dedicated to the Day of Russian science. A. I. Herzen Russian state pedagogical University. 2015. Pp. 28-31.
19. Vail P.The art of management. Moscow, News. 1993. 224 p.
20. Vashhenko D.G., Andrienko A.V. Study of the level of formation of professional competencies of a young specialist. Bulletin of the Tomsk state pedagogical University. 2009. № 9. Pp. 5-10.
About this article
Author: Noskov E.A.
Year: 2020
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-226-34
|