October 2017, № 11 (211), pages 102–105

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-211-102

Rudneva O.S. POLARIZATION SPACE OF THE SOUTHERN URALS AS AN ASPECT OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE TERRITORYSpatial organization of territory is the main factor of regional development. The phenomenon of the compression of the rural space of ubiquitous in most parts of Russia. The study of this process and the development of methods to controls them is among the key tasks of territorial development. Currently, rural areas of the southern Urals exposed to strong demographic change. These shifts lead to the concentration of the rural population and polarization in the rural areas. Based on data for 116 municipalities identify long-term demographic and depressed areas in the countryside of the southern Urals. Revealed the attraction of the population to regional centers and major urban areas. The results are presented in the form of maps, which facilitates their visualization. The main factors of “compression” assimilated spaces are the natural conditions, remoteness from big cities and ethnic peculiarities of conducting economic activity and specificity of human potential in rural areas. Formed a dedicated focal-areal support framework in the rural areas. Further “compression” of space bordering the southern Urals enlarged urban and near urban areas, increasing polarization and fragmentation of space, thereby increasing the burden on the environment, and leave the peripheral, including cross-border areas agricultural and demographically deserted. In view of the current situation requires the emergence of a new paradigm of development of natural resources. This study can be used in the development of territorial planning and evaluation of the distribution of anthropogenic pressures at the Federal and regional levels, as well as management decisions to ensure balanced development of the territory of the Southern Urals.Key words: polarization of the territory, rural population density, depopulation, Southern Urals.

Download

References:

1. Ioffe, G., Nefedova, T., Zaslavsky, I. The End of Peasantry? The Disintegration of Rural Russia. University of Pittsburg Press, 2006, 249 p.

2. Ioffe, G. Nefedova, T. Continuity & Change in Rural Russia. A Geographical Perspective. WestviewPress, 1997, 308 p.

3. Rodoman B. B. Territorial areas and networks. Moscow: Oikumena, 1999.

4. Treivish A. I. Town, district, country and the world. The development of Russia through the eyes of stranovaja. Moscow: New chronograph, 2009, 376 p.

5. The grip socio-economic space: new in the theory of regional development and the practice of its state regulation. Moscow: Eslan, 2010 — 428 pages.

6. Geyer, H.S. and T. Kontuly. A theoretical foundation of the concept of differential urbanization // International Regional Science Review. — 1993. — 15, 3. — P. 157–177.

7. Fielding, A.J. Migration and urbanization in Western Europe since 1950 // The Geographical Journal, 1989. — 155, 1. — P. 60–69.

Richardson, H.W. Polarization reversal in developing countries // Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1980, P. 67–85.

Nefedova T. G. The grip socio-economic space: new in the theory of regional development and the practice of its state regulation. M.: Institute of geography RAS, 2010, Pp. 128-145.

Spatial development glossary. European Conference of Ministers responsible for Spatial/ Regional Planning (CEMAT) // Council of Europe Publishing, 2007. P. 24-29. URL:http://www.coe.int/t/d gap/localdemocracy/cemat/VersionGlossaire Bilingue-en-fr.pdf. (accessed: 14.09.2017)

11. Pivovarov Yu. l. Alternative macroregional development in Russia: squeezing of intensively used space // Geographic bases of the typology of regions for the regional policy of Russia. M., 1995. P. 17-23.

12. Pivovarov Yu. l. Compression of intensively used space: the concept of macro-regional development of Russia // Izv. Russian Academy of Sciences. Ser. “Geography”. 1997. No. 5. P. 114-124.

13. Tihij V. I. Socio-economic transformation of rural areas // Education, science and production. 2014. No. 4 (9). S. 56-58

14.All-Russia population census 2002. URL: http://www.perepis2002.ru/index.html?id=11 (date accessed: 02.09.2017)

15. The database of indicators of municipalities. URL: http://www.gks.ru/dbscripts/munst/ (accessed: 02.09.2017)

16. Nefedova T. G. Polarization space of Russia: areas of growth and “Black holes” // ENSR. 2009. No. 1 (44). P. 62-77.

17. Jepson W. Producing a modern agricultural frontier: firms and cooperatives in Easter Mato Grosso //Economic Geography. 2006. Vol. 82. №3. P. 289-316.

About this article

Author: Rudneva O.S.

Year: 2017

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-211-102

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru