|
|
|
Inozemtseva N.V., Verzhinskaya I.V. STRUCTURAL FEATURES OF SUMMARIES OF SCIENTIFIC AND METHODICAL ARTICLESThis research paper is a parameter of the author activity. It should contain brief, but the sufficient report for understanding the research and objective discussion of its result. The scientific publication shows work of the author to the broad audience of the scientists, who are engaged in the given area of research. As to methodical publications it is necessary to note their constructive character. Both scientific, and methodical articles have similar structure, however the publication anticipates either the summary, or the abstract-text, everything depends on a genre of work. The body of the sample formed base for our research, including summaries of articles published in English-speaking magazines which are intended for theorists and experts in the field of training to English language as foreign. Results of the research show, that the structure of the research paper includes the summary which is its important component. It may contain from 50 up to 400 words depending on complexity of a material and requirements of specific magazine. However, the methodical edition is accompanied by the abstract-text which according to many linguists is considered as a synonym to the term "resume" (articles) and English "abstract". Though the given research denies this point of view.Key words: annotation, abstract-text, article, scientific article, methodical article.
References:
1. Abramov E. G. Kakoj dolzhna byt' annotacija k nauchnoj stat'e / E. G. Abramov // Nauchnaja periodika: problemy i reshenija. — M.: Izdatel'skij dom "BIBLIO-GLOBUS", 2012. — 53 p.
2. Valeeva, N.G. Vvedenie v perevodovedenie / N.G. Valeeva. — M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2006. — 173 p.
3.GOST 7.9-95. Referat i annotacija. Obshhie trebovanija. M.: IPK Izdatel'stvo standartov, 1996. — 7 p.
4. Kozhina, M.N. O specifike hudozhestvennoj i nauchnoj rechi v aspekte funkcional'noj stilistiki [Tekst] / M. N. Kozhina. Perm. un-t, 1986. — P. 213.
5. Meshman, L.I. Kompozicionno-smyslovaja organizacija teksta anglijskoj nauchnoj stat'i / L.I. Meshman // Funkcional'nye stili i prepodavanie inostrannyh jazykov. — M., 1982. — 198 p.
6. Mihajlova, E.V. Intertekstual'nost' v nauchnom diskurse: na materiale statej: dis. … kand. filol. nauk / E.V. Mihajlova. − Volgograd, 1999. — 205 p.
7. Razinkina, N.M. Razvitie jazyka anglijskoj nauchnoj literatury / N.M. Razinkina. — M., 1978. — 146 p.
8. Sysoev P.V. Pravila napisanija annotacii // IJaSh. 2009. №4. — P. 81-83.
9. Trojanskaja, E.S. Obuchenie chteniju nauchnoj literatury / E.S. Trojanskaja. — M., 1989. — 196 p.
10. Cherkunova, M. V. Pragmalingvisticheskie harakteristiki annotacij nauchnoj i uchebnoj literatury: na materiale anglojazychnyh izdanij: avtoref. dis.... kand. filol. nauk / M.V. Cherkunova. − Samara, 2007. − 19 p.
11. Shapkina E. V. Osobennosti perevoda nauchnoj stat'i: annotacija / E. V. Shapkina // Vestnik Juzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Lingvistika. — Cheljabinsk: Juzhno-Ural'skij gosudarstvennyj universitet (nacional'no-issledovatel'skij universitet), 2015. — 87 p.
12. Jazykoznanie: Bol'shoj Jencikl. Slovar' / gl. red. V.N. Jarceva. — 2-e izd. — M.: Bol'shaja Rossijskaja jenciklopedija, 2000. — 688 p.
13. Vijay K. Bhatia. Journal "English For Specific Purposes". — Elsevier B.V., 2010. — P. 378-382.
14. Ilana Salem. "ELT Journal", 61(3). — Oxford University Press, 2007. — P. 211-219.
15. Kretzenbacher, H.L. Wie durchsichtig ist die Sprache der Wissenschaften? // Linguistik der Wissenschaftssprache / H.L. Kretzenbacher, H.Weinrich (Hrsg.). — Berlin, New York, 1995. — 168 p.
About this article
Authors: Inozemtseva N.V., Verzhinskaya I.V.
Year: 2016
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|