Vestnik On-line
Orenburg State University november 28, 2021   RU/EN
Headings of Vestnik
Pedagogics
Psychology
Other

Search
Vak
Антиплагиат
Orcid
Viniti
ЭБС Лань
Rsl
Лицензия Creative Commons

2013, № 3 (152)



Letuta T.V., Markelova I.A. CONTESTATION THE DECISIONS OF THE MEETING: THE PROBLEM OF PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS.In this work assesses the prospects for making changes to the Civil Code of Russia regarding regulation of the meeting solutions applied to joint stock companies. Reveals problems in the implementation of the shareholder rights and management shareholders' right to judicial protection with regard to the provisions of the Draft contesting decisions of meetings. Based on the analysis of judicial practice, a comparative study of laws and regulations provides possible solutions to these problems.Key words: The rights of shareholders, the general meeting, the right to protection, corporate law, contestation the decisions of the meeting.

Download
References:

1 Project № 47538-6/4 Federal Law "On Amendments to Sections 4 and 5 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation" [electronic resource] // Consultant Plus: information and legal system. 1997-2013. Mode of access: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc; base = PRJ; n = 101665 (date accessed: 09.03.2013).

2 Ivanyshyn P.Z. Decision of the meeting as the basis of a civil rights and responsibilities // Civil Law. — 2011. — № 2. — P.8-13;

3 Bondarenko E. Changes in civil law. Decision of the meeting on the same pattern [electronic resource] // Yuskonsalt: Law Firm. Novosibirsk. Mode of access: // http:www.usconsalt.ru/news/4527864/ (date accessed 09.03.2013)

4 Povarov Y.S. Challengeability assembly solutions (critical analysis of the draft Civil Code) // Science and Education: Management and Economics, Entrepreneurship, Law and Management. — 2012. — № 8. — P.66-71;

5 Ganizhev A.Y. Legal nature and types of decisions of the general meeting of the economic society // Journal of Russian law. — 2012. — № 8. — P.112-120.

6 On Joint Stock Companies [Feder.Law: adopted by the State. Duma on November 24, 1995: As of December 7, 2011 g]. — M: Prospect, 2012. p.42.

7 Resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation of July 28, 2009 № 4016/09 [electronic resource] // Consultant Plus: information and legal system. 1997-2013. Mode of access: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc; base = ARB; n = 119629 (date accessed: 09.03.2013).

8 Generalization jurisprudence of cases contestation the decision of the meeting of the founders (shareholders) of the business partnerships and companies. [Electronic resource] // The Arbitration Court of Rostov region. 2008. July 9. [website] Access mode: http://rostov.arbitr.ru/node/1991 (date accessed: 11.03.2013).

9 Synthesis jurisprudence resolution of cases challenging the decisions and the decisions of the OS operating system of the LLC. The recommendations were approved at a meeting of the Seventh Appellate Court on June 23, 2008. Number 6 [electronic resource] // Russian legal newspaper EJ-lawyer. 2009. June 1. Mode of access: http://www.gazeta-yurist.ru/arbitr.php?i=476. (date accessed: 03/09/2013).

10 Resolution of the Federal Arbitration Court of the Far Eastern District of May 5, 2012 F03-1298/2012 number [electronic resource] // Consultant Plus: information and legal system. 1997-2013. Mode of access: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc; base = ADV; n = 62158 (date accessed: 11.03.2013).

11 Resolution of the Federal Arbitration Court of the Ural District on March 23, 2012 N F09-9910/11 the case number A50-8278/2011 [electronic resource] / / Consultant Plus: information and legal system. 1997-2013. Mode of access: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc; base = AUR; n = 126151 (date accessed: 12.03.2013).

12 Resolution of the Federal Arbitration Court of the Ural District on October 3, 2012 in case number F09-8079/12 number A47-12772/2011 [electronic resource] / / Consultant Plus: information and legal system. 1997-2013. Mode of access: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc; base = AUR; n = 131863 (date accessed: 11.03.2013).

13 Resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation of July 28, 2009 № 4016/09 [electronic resource] / / Consultant Plus: information and legal system. 1997-2013. Mode of access: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc; base = ARB; n = 119629 (date accessed: 09.03.2013).

14 Resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation № 2013/12. Moscow. 20 November 2012 Mr. [electronic resource] / / The Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. [a large selection]. Mode of access: arbitr.ru / bras.net / f.aspx? Id_casedoc = 1_1_2a349877-15d8 (date accessed: 03/12/13).

15 Report on the outcome of the trial. [Electronic resource] / / The Moscow Arbitration Court. [website]. Mode of access: http://www.msk.arbitr.ru/about/report/ (date accessed: 13.03.2013).

16 Bank of arbitral awards of the Russian Federation. [Electronic resource] / / The Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. [a large selection]. Mode of access: http://ras.arbitr.ru/ (date accessed 15.03.2013).

17 Chepiga T.D. On the resolution of disputes relating to the management of challenging acts and transactions the Company on the basis of the doctrine of succession [electronic resource] / / "Bulletin of the Federal Arbitration Court of the North Caucasus Military District number 5 September-October 2004 Mode access: http://fassko.arbitr.ru/novosti/vestnik/archive/8341.html (date accessed: 11.03.2013).

18 L.I. Petrazhitsky. Joint Stock Company — St. Petersburg, 1898. — P.155.

19 Asknazy S.I. On the basis of the legal relationship between the state socialist organizations / / Proceedings of the Leningrad Institute of Law. — Issue 4, 1947. — P.125.

20 Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation of November 18, 2003. On some issues of the Federal Law "On Joint Stock Companies" [electronic source] / / Consultant Plus: information and legal system. 1997-2013. Mode of access: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc; base = LAW; n = 45494 (date accessed: 10.03.2013).

21 Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. — 2009. — № 5. — 324.

22 Bondarenko E. Changes in civil law. Decision of the meeting on the same pattern [electronic resource] / / Yuskonsalt: Law Firm. Novosibirsk. Mode of access: / / http:www.usconsalt.ru/news/4527864/ (date accessed 09.03.2013).


About this article

Authors: Letuta T.V., Markelova I.A.

Year: 2013


Editor-in-chief
Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

Crossref
Cyberleninka
Doi
Europeanlibrary
Googleacademy
scienceindex
worldcat
© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru
1999–2021 © CIT OSU