january 14, 2025

RU/EN

Headings of Vestnik

November 2024, № 4 (244), pages 44-51

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-244-44

Kolobova L.V., Ksenofontova A.N.1, Moroz V.V. ABOUT DIGITALIZATION IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESSThe introduction of digital educational environment is caused by global changes that the education sector is currently experiencing. One of the strong and constant arguments in favor of the integration of digital technologies in education is their contribution to improving the teaching and learning situation. From this point of view, the government develops and implements digital integration policies, educational entities develop “technopedagogical” practices, and scientists study the consequences in order to identify their effectiveness for teaching and learning. Thus, educational, political and scientific issues related to digital technologies in education have united around the issue of the impact of digital technologies on the educational process. For decades, the perception of digital technologies in education has been dominated by the paradigm that digital technologies carry educational potentials that can change the situation. And, in this case, the task of educational entities, politics and science is how to actualize these potentials so that they have a concrete and noticeable impact. Digital technologies, in terms of their impact on improving the teaching and learning situation, are essentially the driving force of progress and effectiveness of education. By overestimating the role of digital technologies, we neglect the role of educational subjects. Reduced to the role of performers, their main task will be to not hinder the influence of digital technologies, providing them with optimal conditions for realizing their potential. In addition, such a paradigm is an oversimplification of the pedagogical situation, according to which digital technologies are perceived as a determining factor in teaching and learning in a cause-and-effect relationship. The use of multimedia opens the way for students to more independent study of the subject. Properly organized and supported multimedia work with students allows the teacher to activate the processes of knowledge acquisition. In turn, this implies, on the part of both the teacher and the student, mastery of technological culture.Key words: digitalization, digital tools, motivation, teacher, students, learning methods, online resources, adaptation of teaching methods, student diversity.

Download

References:

1. Boronenko T.M., Fedotova V.S. (2021) Digital educational environment of school as a basis for forming digital literacy of school children. Pedagogika informatiki, № 1, pp. 1-17.

2. Grebennikova V.M. (2019) On the issue of digitalization of education. Istoricheskaya i sozialno-obrazovatelnaya mysl, Vol. 11, № 5, pp. 158-165. doi: 10.17748/2075-9908-2019-11-5-158-165.

3. Danilova L.N., Ledovskaya T.V., Solynin N.E. and Khodyrev A.M. (2020) The main approaches to understanding digitalisation and digital values. Vestnik of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics, vol. 26, № 2, pp. 5-12 (In Russ.). DOI 10.34216/2073-1426-2020-26-2-5-12.

4. Inozemtseva N.V. and Yovkova N.N. (2022) Modern internet resources and mobile applications as a means of motivating students to learn chinese. Vestnik of Orenburg state university, №2 (234), pp.20-25.

5. Ismailova Sh.A. (2020) Applying of information and communication technologies in distance learning conditions. Vestnik of Orenburg state university, №2 (225), pp. 31-37.

6. Kapkova E.E. (2024) Pedagogical support for digital socialisation of adolescents in the educational process. Vestnik of Orenburg state university, №1 (241), pp. 32-38.

7. Konkov A.E. (2020) Digital politics vs political digitalization. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, vol. 13, issue 1, pp. 47-68. URL: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2020.104 (In Russian)

8. Kudlaev M.S. (2018) Process cifrovizacii obrazovaniya v Rossii. Young scientist, No. 31(217), pp. 3-7. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/217/52242/

9. Napsо M. (2022) The education system in the context of modern digitalization policy. Transbaikal State University Journal, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 56-62. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2022-28-2-56-62.

10. O provedenyi experimenta po vnedreniyu cyfrovoy obrazovatelnoy sredy: postanovlenye Pravitelstva Rossijskoj Federacii 7 december 2020. URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/74922819/ (accessed 12.09.2024)

11. Feshchenko T.S. (2019) On the issue of digitalization of education. Sovremennyi outchenyi, № 3, pp. 181-185.

12. Amadieu F. and Tricot A. (2014). Appendre avec le numйrique, mythes et rйalitйs. Paris: йdition Retz.

13. Beccheti-Bizot C. (2017). Йvolution des modalitйs de transmission pйdagogiques: incidences sur l’espace scolaire dans le 2nd degrй. Administration & Йducation, 156(4), pp. 11-19. URL: https://www.cairn.info/revue-administration-et-education-2017-4-page11.htm?contenu=resume (accessed 07.09.2024)

14. Bouheraoua Z. (2006) Les exercices numйriques interactifs : outil d’apprentissage? Innovations, usages, rйseaux. Montpellier, France, pp. 1–13.

15. Hasselbring T.S. and Glaser C.H.W. (2000). Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. Future of Children, 10, pp. 102-122.

16. Howe N. and Strauss W. (2009). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

17. Ciekansky M. (2019) Comment l’enseignement peut-il guider les йlиves vers l’autonomie. URL: http://www.cnesco.fr/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/CCLV_CIEKANSKI_MEFv2.pdf (accessed 10.10.2024)

18. Edmunds R., Thorpe M. and Conole G. (2012). Student attitudes towards anduse of ICT in course study, work and social activity: A technology acceptance model approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, pp. 71–84.

19. Helsper E. and Eynon R. (2010). Digital natives: where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), pp. 503-520.

20. Negroponte N. (1995) Being Digital. New York: Knopf, 256 p. URL: http://governance40.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Nicholas-Negroponte-Being-Digital-Vintage-1996.pdf. (accessed 07.09.2024)

21. Poellhuber B., Karsenti T., Raynaud J., Dumouchel, G., Roy N., Fournier Saint-Laurent S. and Gйraudie N. (2012). Les habitudes technologiques au cйgep : rйsultats d’une enquкte effectuйe auprиs de 30724 йtudiants. Montrйal ; QC : Centre de recherche interuniversitaire sur la formation et la profession enseignante (CRIFPE). URL: https://cdc.qc.ca/pdf/poellhubert-karsenty-sondage-etudiants-tic-synthese2012.pdf (accesed 10.10.2024)

22. Prensky M. (2011, Octobre) Digital Natives, Digital Inmigrants. On the Horizon (MCB University Press), Vol.9 nє5.

23. Selwyn N. (2009, July). The digital native-myth and reality. ASLIB Proceedings, 61(4), pp. 364-379.

24. Serres M. (2012) Petite Poucette. Paris : Editions le Pommier.

25. Sumak B., Hericko M and Pusnik M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance : The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, pp. 2067-2077.

26. Viau R. (2015) La motivation en contexte scolaire. 2nd edition, 218 p.

27. Wouters P. and Van Oostendorp H. (2013). A meta-analytic review of the role of instructional support in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 60, pp. 412-425.

About this article

Authors: Kolobova L.V., Ksenofontova A.N., Moroz V.V.

Year: 2024

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-244-44

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru