|
|
|
August 2018, № 6 (218), pages 61-69doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-218-61
Moroz V.V., Sakharova N.S. THE DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT CREATIVITY IN THE PROCESS OF “TEACHER AND STUDENT” CREATIVE AND VALUE INTERACTIONRecently, there has been a sharp increase in public interest in the development of personality creativity. On a global scale, numerous attempts are being made to implement programs for the development of personality creativity at all levels of the educational system. Education plays an important role in the development of the creative and cultural potential of any state. The creative class makes a huge contribution to the welfare of the country, the growth of the economy and national identity. As a result of our research, it was revealed that the “teacher and student” creative-value interaction stimulates students to active learning, which contributes to the development of their creativity, regardless of the subject being taught. We have identified the following factors for the successful development of creativity of university students in the process of creative-value interaction between a teacher and a student. First, the model of creative behavior, of which the teacher is a model. Secondly, the teacher’s true value attitude to the students' creative abilities. The creative teacher seeks to teach the skills of creative and critical thinking, the features and stages of the creative process, as well as to create a favorable environment for the development of creativity. Thirdly, creativity is more productive in a team, and the more diverse and diverse the team members are, the more interesting and original ideas will appear. As our research has shown, the result of the “teacher and student” creative-value interaction is the professional and moral enrichment of the individual, the actualization of achievement motives, the development of creativity and the qualifications of students. We have confirmed that students transfer creativity to their livelihoods after they graduate from the university, bringing their creative ideas to life, opening up new opportunities.Key words: student creativity, “teacher and student” creative-value interaction, development of creativity, value orientations.
References:
1. Bono E. Nestandartnoe myshlenie: samouchitel [Non-standard thinking: self-instruction]. Minsk, Potpourri, 2006, 272 p.
2. Grimak L.P. Rezervy chelovecheskoj psihiki: vved. v psihologiyu aktivnosti [Reserves of the human psyche: introduction, into the psychology of activity]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1989, 318 p.
3. Gusinsky E.N. Vvedenie v filosofiyu obrazovaniya [Introduction to the philosophy of education]. Moscow, Logos, 2000, 224 p.
4. Kiriakova A.V., Moroz V.V. Aksiologiya kreativnosti [The Axiology of Creativity]. Moscow, House of Education, 2014, 225 p. ISBN 978-5-904823-12-2.
5. Lehrer D. Voobrazi. Kak rabotaet kreativnost’ [Imagine. How creativity works]. Moscow, AST, CORPUS, 2013, 304 p.
6. Moroz V.V. Axiological foundations of university students’ creativity development. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Orenburg, 2015, 44 p.
7. Moroz V.V. Osobennosti rezonansnogo kreativno-cennostnogo vzaimodejstviya “prepodavatel’-student-gruppa” v kompetentnostno-orientirovannoj obrazovatel’noj srede universiteta. Obshchestvo: sociologiya, psihologiya, pedagogika [Society: sociology, psychology, pedagogy], 2016, no. 7, pp. 51–53.
8. Prigozhin A.I. Celi i cennosti. Novye metody raboty s budushchim [Objectives and values. New methods of working with the future]. Moscow, The ANH, 2010, 432 p.
9. Chikszentmihayi, M. Kreativnost’. Potok i psihologiya otkrytij i izobretenij [Creativity. The flow and psychology of discoveries and inventions]. Moscow, Career Press, 2013, 528 p. ISBN 978-5-904946-71-5.
10. Shcherbakova E.E. Pedagogical Creativity as a Factor of Professional Development of Students. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Cheboksary, 2006, 43 p.
11. Agnoli S. The emotionally intelligent use of attention and affective arousal under creative frustration and creative success. Personality and Individual Differences. Elsevier. In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 1 May 2018.
12. Amabile T. Affect and Creativity at Work. Administartive Science Quarterly, 2005, no. 50, рр. 368.
13. Amabile T., Kramer S. Inner Work Life: Understanding the Subtext of Business Performance. Harvard Business Review 85, no. 5 (May 2007).
14. Antonites A.J. An Action Learning Approach to Entrepreneurial Creativity, Innovation and Opportunity Finding. University of Pretoria, 2003, 486 p.
15. Azzam A.М. Why Creativity Now? A Conversation with Sir Ken Robinson. Teaching for the 21st Century. 2009, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 22–26. Available at: http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept09/vol67/num01/Why-Creativity-Now%C2%A2-A-Conversation-with-Sir-Ken-Robinson.aspx .
16. Cole D., Sugioka H., Yamagata-Lynch L. Supportive Classroom Environments for Creativity in Higher Education. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1999, no. 33(4), pp. 277–293.
17. Matthews K.E., Garratt C., Macdonald D. The higher education landscape: Trends and implication. Discussion Paper. Brisbane: The University of Queensland, 2008, 10 p.
18. Rank J. The Impact of emotions, moods and other affect-related variables on creativity, innovation and initiative in organizations. Research Companion to Emotion in Organizations. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar Publ., 2008, pp. 103–119.
19. Schwartz S. Self-regulation, Motivational Conflict and Values. 2009, 345 p.
About this article
Authors: Moroz V.V., Saharova N.S.
Year: 2018
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-218-61
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|