October 2017, № 11 (211), pages 36–39

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-211-36

Shcheglova M.I., Nevolina V.V. FORMATION OF OUTLOOK IN SELF-DEVELOPMENT OF THE STUDENT The difference of outlook from set of opinions is that the outlook is system, all his elements are interconnected and have the general basis in the logical and genetic justification. Outlook formation difficult and long process in which the higher education plays one of key roles. The spontaneous and ordinary device of ideas of the world leads the person to mythological views which syncretism complicates self-development of the personality. This difficulty is expressed in impossibility of forming of strong communications in the strategy of personal improvement. Transfer of provision of a znaniyevy paradigm from the purpose to the area of an implementer of competence-based approach allows to claim that a task of Higher Education Institution not only in vocational training of experts, but also in assistance in internal systematization of outlook of students. Axiological intensions of outlook of the student provide him creation of an author’s trajectory of self-development. Professional self-development as one of the leading vectors of self-improvement, is classified by the following methodological bases: traditional, innovative and forsayt-strategy. During the empirical research, the explanation of connection of outlook with self-development process was made to students and also the concepts “career” and “professional development” were differentiated. Students 1 and 2 courses of the Orenburg state medical University acted as selection. By result of completion of studying of disciplines “philosophy”, “bioethics” and “the person and culture” has been approved the axiological questionnaire which has allowed to establish orientation of students on practical aspect of profession of a physician. During the conversations it has been established that for students professional self-development is a necessary condition for achievement of the key purpose — maintaining health of the population. Key words: outlook, self-development, acmeism, philosophy, resource.

Download

References:

1. Eysenck, H. J. The structure of human personality / H. J. Eysenck — London: Methuen, 2013 — 348 p.

2. Feinstein J.S. The relationship between socioeconomic status and health: a review of the literature / J.S. Feinstein // The Milbank Quarterly. — 2014. — Vol. 71. — № 2. — P. 279-322.

3. Frankel, M.S. (Ed.) Values and Ethics in Organization and Human Systems Development. An Annotated Bibliography /M.S. Frankel. — USA, 2016.

4. Galeaa S. Cities and population health / S. Galeaa, N. Freudenbergs, D. Vlahova // Social Science & Medicine. — 2015. — № 60. — P. 1017-1033.

5. Goldberg L. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. “The American Psychologist, 48”, — 2013.

6. Hobfoll, S.E. Resource loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomesamong inner city women / S.E. Hobfoll, R.J. Johnson, N. Ennis, A.P. Jackson // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. — 2013. — 84. — P. 632–643.

7. Holtmann, M. Resilienz im Kindes— und Jugendalter / M. Holtmann, M.H. Schmidt // Kindheit und Entwicklung. — 2014. — № 13. — R. 195–200.

8. Kindley R. The Power of Simulation-based e-Learning // The e-Learning Developers’ Journal. September 17 — 2012. — P. 1-8.

9. Kohlberg L. Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach // Moral development and behavior: Theory research and Social issues. -N.Y. — 2016 — P.31–53.

10. Laucht, M. Wovor schätzen Schutzfaktoren? Anmerkungen zu einem populären Konzept der modernen Gesundheitsforschung / M. Laucht, G. Esser, M.H. Schmidt // Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie. — 2017. — 29. — P. 260–270.

11. Martin, R.A. Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire / R.A. Martin, P. Puhlik-Doris, G. Larsen, J. Gray, K. Weir // Journal of Research in Personality. –2013. — № 37. — R.48–75.

12. Afanasenko I.V. Strategii postroeniya kar’ery kak komponent professional’noj YA-koncepcii / I.V. Afanasenko // Sbornik materialov III Vserossijskogo s”ezda prakticheskih psihologov sistemy obrazovaniya. — M.: 2013. S.234-237.

13. Vihanskij O. S. Strategicheskoe upravlenie / Vihanskij O.S. — M. :Gardarika, 2014. — 296 s.

14. Minyurova S.A. Psihologicheskie osnovaniya vybora strategij samorazvitiya v professii: dis. ... d.ps.n. Ekaterinburg, 2013. — 360s.

15. Nevolina V.V. Resursy professional’nogo samorazvitiya lichnosti studenta v medicinskom obrazovanii: teoriya i metodologiya. Orenburg, — 2016.

16. Nevolina V.V., Belonovskaya I.D. Klassifikaciya strategij professional’nogo samorazvitiya studenta v medicinskom obrazovanii // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. — 2017. — № 3. — S.18-27.

17. Symanyuk EH.EH. Psihologicheskie bar’ery professional’nogo razvitiya lichnosti. Praktiko-orientirovannaya monografiya / Pod red. EH.F. Zeera. — M.: Moskovskij psihologo-social’nyj institut — 2015 — 252 s.

About this article

Authors: Shcheglova M.I., Nevolina V.V.

Year: 2017

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-211-36

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru