|
|
|
September 2025, № 3 (247), pages 127-132doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-247-127
Sikorskaya G.A. SELF-COMPILATION OF SUBJECT TEST AS EDUCATIONAL FACTOR OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTModern university student education is characterized by the level of formation of key subject competencies, the ability to choose a rational approach to solving educational and life problems, and the ability to acquire knowledge independently. The goals of the educational process are determined by the requirements of state educational standards, the degree of implementation of which is fixed by various forms of assessment, in particular, testing. A test is a set of standardized control tasks with the necessary system–forming statistical characteristics that provide reliable and valid estimates of a measurement variable. Testing in mathematical disciplines serves not only to assess the subject theoretical knowledge of students, but also to assess the ability to solve mathematical problems of various levels of complexity. In general, the search for ways to solve problems is a process of creative thinking, the main component in building a research understanding of the problem–solving process. An effective way of learning how to solve problems is their construction – a set of mental operations that, according to a given abstract situation, allow you to formulate a task and complete its solution. The process of creating a test consists of constructing a task (question); observing the proportions between the task condition and the answer; building distractors, taking into account balancing the ratio with the correct answer. Independent preparation of a subject test by a university student contributes to the formation of the ability to identify life problems and find solutions to them; the development of inquisitiveness of mind, inventiveness of thinking, which is especially in demand in the professional development of a future engineer.Key words: university student, testing, task design, subject test preparation, quality of education.
References:
1. Avanesov B.C. (1989) Fundamentals of the scientific organization of pedagogical control in higher education: A textbook for students of the Educational Center. Moscow, 107 p.
2. Bakulevskaya S. A. (2001) Heuristic task as a subjective space of a child’s self-development. Moscow, 7 p .
3. Buzulina T.I. (2002) Uncertain tasks in analytical geometry in the professional training of future mathematics teachers. PhD Dissertation. Volgograd, 230 p.
4. Vatlina T.N. and Demchinskaya E.A. (2021) The history of the test method of knowledge verification. Scientific and educational potential as a factor of national security : a collection of scientific papers based on the materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference on May 12, 2021. Belgorod : Agency for Advanced Scientific Research (APNI), LLC, pp. 115-119.
5. Gamova N.A., N.V. Kulish and G.A. Sikorskaya (2018) Pedagogical support for knowledge control in teaching mathematics. Vestik of Orenburg State University, № 2 (214), pp. 25-32.
6. Kanin E.S. (1991) Development of the problem topic. Mathematics at school, № 3.
7. Kargapoltseva N.A. and E.F. Maslikova (2016) Realization of the personal-developing potential of design in education as a pedagogical problem. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, № 12, pp. 21-28.
8. Kolyagin Yu.M. (1977) Mathematical problems as a means of teaching and developing secondary school students. Doctoral dissertation. Moscow, 398 p.
9. Kostryukov A.V. and Sikorskaya G.A. (2002) Testing as one of the forms of assessing the quality of knowledge. Actual problems of personnel training for the development of the Orenburg region economy : materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Forum “Innovations-2002”, February 6-8, 2002. Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation. Russian Federation, Orenburg State University. Orenburg : OSU, part 1, pp. 127-130.
10. Kostryukov A.V. and G.A. Sikorskaya (2002) On the principles of continuing education and their implementation at the school-university stage. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, № 2, pp. 85-88.
11. Kostryukov A.V. and Sikorskaya G.A. (2004) Mathematics : a textbook for university applicants. Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation. Federation, State Educational Institution institution of higher Prof. education “Orenburg State University”. Orenburg: OSU, 473 p.
12. Kulish N.V., T.V. Arkhipenko, A.A. Ryabova and I.N. Balakin (2024) Psychological difficulties in studying mathematics by students of technical specialties. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, № 1 (241), pp. 68-74.
13. Pastukhov D.I. and E.D. Pastukhova (2001) Methods forming cognitive and independent activity of trainees. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, No. 4, pp. 51-53.
14. Poya D. (1959) How to solve a problem. Moscow: Nauka, 208 p.
15. Sikorskaya G.A., Dzhukashev K.R. and Kryuchkova I.V. (2020) On the problem of improving the quality of mathematical education and proposals for overcoming it. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, No. 3, pp. 64-80.
16. Sosnovsky V.I. and Teslenko V.I. (1995) Management issues in education. Part 1. (Pedagogical testing). Krasnoyarsk, 90 p.
17. Shamova T.I., Belova S.N., Ilina I.V., Podchalimova G.N. et al. (2007) Modern means of assessing learning outcomes at school: A textbook. Moscow: Pedagogical Society of Russia, 192 p.
18. Shchapov A., Tikhomirova N., Yershikov S. and Lobova T. (1999) Test control in the rating system. Higher education in Russia, No. 3, pp. 100-102.
19. Friedman L.M. (1977) Logical and psychological analysis of school educational tasks. Moscow: Pedagogika, 207 p.
20. Erdniev P.M. and Erdniev B.P. (1996) Teaching mathematics at school. Enlargement of didactic units: A book for teachers. M.: Century, 105 p.
About this article
Author: Sikorskaya G.A.
Year: 2025
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-247-127
|
|
 Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|