Vestnik On-line
Orenburg State University november 24, 2024   RU/EN
Headings of Vestnik
Pedagogics
Psychology
Other

Search
Vak
Антиплагиат
Orcid
Viniti
ЭБС Лань
Rsl
Лицензия Creative Commons

February 2018, № 2 (214), pages 12–19

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-214-12

Akhmedyanova G.F., Pishchukhin A.M. THE COMPUTER SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR THE PROCESS OF DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT OF THE LEARNER’S COMPETENCY LEVELDiagnostic assessment refers to a process based on methods and successive levels of competency level recognition of the learner as a whole or the development of his individual competences. Diagnostic evaluation can be interpreted as the process of recognizing the level and assessing the individual characteristics of the learner, including a purposeful study of the personality, interpretation of the results obtained and their generalization in the form of an established the presubmitter’s response. Since competence is an abstract object of management, it is impossible to directly assess its state. For the real management of the evaluation process, it is necessary to influence the material carrier of this quality — the learner with the simultaneous creation of the same conditions for all those evaluated in order to obtain an objective result. As a toolkit in the computer support system, diagnostic tests, indicative evaluation, assessment based on a diagnostic hypothesis and differential estimation are used. The results are assessed separately for indicators of erudition, creativity, motivation, initiative, autonomy. Then the integral criterion of additive, multiplicative and mixed types is used. Final assessment is left for the teacher. Due to the algorithmization, it is possible to assess competence integrally by selected components, and at the expense of computer support, store, systematize and take into account the background of the evaluation, conduct a numerical analysis of the results by many criteria. This allows the teacher to focus on the creative component of the diagnosis.Key words: diagnostic estimation, competence level, computer support system, estimation algorithm.

Download
References:

1. Hopkins, D. Bol'shaya ehnciklopediya medicinskoj diagnostiki [Encyclopedia of Medical Diagnostics]. AST, 2007, 352 p.

2. Efremova N.F. Specifika i problemy formirovaniya i ocenivaniya kompetencij. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education], 2017, no. 6. Available at: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=27229. Accessed 22.03.2018.

3. Arkaeva R.P. Kvalimetricheskij podhod v upravlenii kachestvom obrazovaniya studentov. Vektor nauki TGU [Vector of science TSU], ser. Pedagogika, psihologiya, 2012, no. 1, pp. 38–41.

4. Bolotov V.A., Val'dman I.A., Gorbovskij R.V. et al. Klyuchevye voprosy razvitiya nacional'nyh i regional'nyh sistem ocenki kachestva obrazovaniya (ehkspertnyj obzor) [Key issues in the development of national and regional systems for assessing the quality of education (peer review)]. M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki, 2016, 232 p.

5. Bogdanova, A.V. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie predposylki issledovaniya voprosov diagnostiki kachestva obrazovaniya v vysshej shkole. Vektor nauki TGU [Vector of science TSU], ser. Pedagogika, psihologiya, 2015, no. 1(20), pp. 12–16.

6. Bolotov V. et al. Russian quality assessment system in education. Russian Education and Society, 2015, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 531–571.

7. Antoshkin V.N. et al. Sociological research as a mesthod of social diagnostics. Eurasian journal of analytical chemistry, 2017, vol. 12, no. 7b, pp. 1605–1613.

8. Grudzinskiy A.O., Petrova O.V. Comparative method of diagnostics of organizational culture of innovative university. Asian social science, 2015, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 224–230.

9. Smirnova Z. et al. Estimation of educational results of the bachelor's programme students. Mathematics education, 2016, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 3469–3475.

10. Ponomareva E.Y., Khuziakhmetov A.N. Psychological diagnostics of the first-year students' adaptation to a higher school environment. Man In India, 2017, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 417–430.

11. Vladimirovna M.N., Alekseevich K.I. , Anatolievna T.T. Express assessment of the students' adaptive abilities and revealing of the risk group. Asian social science, 2015, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 313–320.

12. Ingekamp, K. Pedagogicheskaya diagnostika [Pedagogical diagnostics]. M., 1991, 240 p.

13. Podlasyj I.P. Novyj kurs: Uchebnik dlya studentov pedagogicheskih vuzov: V 2 kn. [New course: Textbook for students of pedagogical universities: In 2 books.]. M.: Gumanit. izd. centr VLADOS, 1999, 576 p.

14. Pedagogicheskij ehnciklopedicheskij slovar' [Pedagogical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. M., 2002, p. 190.

15. Pishchuhin A.M., Ahmed'yanova G.F. Metodika ocenki ehffektivnosti pedagogicheskih sredstv. Vserossijskaya n/p konferenciya «Modernizaciya pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya v kontekste global'noj obrazovatel'noj povestki». Nizhegorodskij gosudarstvennyj pedagogicheskij universitet im. K. Minina [All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference «Modernization of Teacher Education in the Context of the Global Educational Agenda». K. Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University], 2015, pp. 105–108.

16. Pidkasistyi P.I. (ed.) Pedagogika [Pedagogy]. M.: Vysshee obrazovanie, 2007, 430 p.

17. Ahmed'yanova G.F., Moshurov N.P., Eroshenko O.S. Vliyanie universitetskoj sredy na uspeshnost' obucheniya studentov tekhnicheskogo profilya. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and practice of social development], 2014, no. 7, pp. 70–72.

18. Gruzdeva M.L., Koshelev I.A. Pedagogicheskoe ocenivanie rezul'tatov obrazovatel'nogo processa v vuze. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii [Modern high technologies], 2015, no. 12–1, pp. 70–72.

19. Mironov S.V., Pishchuhin A.M. Metasistemnyj podhod v upravlenii [Metasystem approach in management]. Orenburg, 2005, 336 s.

20. Bilousova L., Kolgatin1 O., Kolgatina1 L. Pedagogical Diagnostics with Use of Computer Technologies. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications: Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer. Kherson, Ukraine, June 19–22, 2013, pp. 209–220.

21. Koryachko V.P., Kurejchik V.M., Norenkov I.P. Teoreticheskie osnovy SAPR [Theoretical foundations of CAD]. M.: EHnergoatomizdat, 1987, 400 p.


About this article

Authors: Ahmedyanova G.F., Pishchuhin A.M.

Year: 2018

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-214-12

Editor-in-chief
Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

Crossref
Cyberleninka
Doi
Europeanlibrary
Googleacademy
scienceindex
worldcat
© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru
1999–2024 © CIT OSU