|
|
|
July 2017, № 8 (208), pages 76-79doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-208-76
Sizova E.A., Romanova A.P., Umrihina V.V THE USE OF FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY ALBURNUS ALBURNUS AND RANA RIDIBUNDA TO EVALUATE THE QUALITY OF THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTRivers of the Orenburg region are susceptible to the emergence of various environmental problems, as experienced significant anthropogenic and technogenic load. To date, the shortcomings in the system for monitoring ecological status of water bodies, which is based only on the determination of pollutants and their comparison with maximum permissible concentrations, is pretty obvious, and more preference is given to biological methods of assessing the state of the environment. Biological assessment can be implemented through the use of organisms-bioindicators, which in this work are Alburnus alburnus and Rana ridibunda. Analysis of stability of development of morphological structures of these animals allows you to set the class of water quality in the studied reservoirs according to the index, CAP (the number of asymmetric manifestations on the symptom). During the selection of animals a class of water quality in the river Sakmara and the Ural river at the study sites. The results of a study of fluctuating asymmetry showed class 3 of water quality (polluted) with index CAP 0.4 and 0.58 for Alburnus alburnus and Rana ridibunda, respectively, in the control points, which was the plot of the Sakmara river near the village of Lenin and the land of the Ural river in the vicinity of the pedestrian bridge on the “Promenade” of the city of Orenburg. And 4 and 5 grade quality (dirty and very dirty) with index CAP from 0.47 to 0.6 for Alburnus alburnus and from 0.61 to 0.73 for Rana ridibunda in the areas of the Sakmara river near the railway bridge within the boundaries of the village Berdy and near the road bridge on St. Brothers korostelevyh, as well as the territories of the Ural river near the railway bridge in the Central Area of Orenburg in close proximity to garden Association “Gazovik” and in the area of road bridge, located on Country road. The data obtained demonstrate the possibility of using fluctuating asymmetry to evaluate the ecological status of the water environment.Key words: bioindication, fluctuating asymmetry, developmental stability, the river Sakmara, Ural river.
References:
1. Lebedev S., Yausheva E., Galaktionova L., Sizova E. Impact of molybdenum nanoparticles on survival, activity of enzymes, and chemical elements in Eisenia fetida test on substrata // Environ Sci Res DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-6916;
2. Kosyan D., Rusakova E., Miroshnikov S., Sizova E. The toxic effect and mechanisms of nanoparticles on freshwater infusoria // International Journal of GEOMATE. — 2016. — Vol. 11. — P. 2170-2176.
3. Yausheva E.,Sizova E., Lebedev S., Skalny A., Miroshnikov S., Plotnikov A., Khlopko Y., et all. Influence of zinc nanoparticles on survival of worms Eisenia fetida and taxonomic diversity of the gut microflora // Environ Sci Pollut Res. — 2016. — Vol. 23. — P.13245-13254.
4. Mukhamedzhanova E.J. habitat Monitoring. — Omsk: Publishing house Omgtu, 2015. — S. 110.
5. Schulz, R., Liss, R. Chronic effects of low insecticide concentrations on freshwater larvae // Hydrobiology. — 1997. — No. 2. — S. 103-113.
6. Panels.F. The mechanism of response of aquatic organisms to exposure to toxic substances // Anthropogenic impact on aquatic ecosystems. — M: Izd-vo MGU, 2005. — P. 70-93.
7. Zakharov M. Asymmetry of morphological structures of animals, as an indicator of minor changes to the environment state // Problems of ecological monitoring and modelling of ecosystems. — 1981. — S. 115-123.
8. Melekhov P. Biological control of environment: bioindication and biotesting. — M., 1997. — P.13.
9. Depledge M.H. healthy animals, healthy ecosystems Galloway // front ecology. — 2015. — №3(5). — R. 251-257.
10. Baharudin Z.M., Ramli. L., Othman, R. species Diversity of amphibians in lake city as an ecological indicator of a healthy aquatic environment // University Putra Malaysia. — 2015. — No. 8. — P. 70-76.
11. Shuya F. Bioindication of water environment quality, state of freshwater ecosystems and their anthropogenic changes // Proc. scientific. Dokl. At the VII Intern. Conf. “Environment and development North-West of Russia”. — 2002. — №4. — P. 64-69.
12. Relyea A.R. lethal impact of roundup on aquatic and terrestrial amphibians // ecological applications. — 2005. — No. 15. — S. 1118-1124.
13. Sladecek V. system of water quality from the biological point of view // arch. Hydrobiol. Ergeb. — Limnol. — 1983. — No. 3. — S. 211-218.
14. Semenchenko V.P. the Principles and system of bioindication of flowing water. — Minsk: Publishing house “Nut” 2005,. — P. 124.
15. Johnson R.K. Freshwater biomonitoring using individual organisms, populations, species and communities of benthic invertebrates // freshwater Biomonitoring and benthic Macroinvertebrates. — N. Ya — 2000. — No. 1. — P. 40-158.
About this article
Authors: Umrihina V.V., Sizova E.A., Romanova A.P.
Year: 2017
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-208-76
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|