2014, № 12 (173)

1. Contemporary approaches to evaluation of anatomic and functional state of cornea / S.E. Avetisov [et al.] // Vest. Ophthalm. — 2010. — (4). — P. 59–63.

2. Kolotov, M.G. Regarding corneal response on LASIK correction of myopia / M.G. Kolotov // Ophthalmosurg. — 2009. — (3). — P. 9–11.

3. Pateeva, T.Z. IntraLASIK end LASIK in the correction of myopia (comparative analysis) / T.Z. Pateeva, N.P. Pashtaev // Ophthalmosurg. — 2009. — (3). — P. 9–11.

4. Thin-flap (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) versus thick — flap laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: case-control analysis / D.T. Azar [et al.] // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. — 2008. — (12). — P. 2073–2078.

5. Flap thickness variation with 3 types of microkeratome heads / S. Du [et al.] // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. — 2011. — (1). — P. 144–148.

6. Thin LASIK flap creation using the SCHWIND Carriazo-Pendular microkeratome / G.D. Kymionis [et al.] // J. Refract. Surg. — 2009. — 25. — (1). — P. 33–36.

7. Yau, C.W. Microkeratome blades and corneal flap thickness in LASIK / C.W. Yau, H.C. Cheng // Ophthalmic. Surg. Lasers. Imaging. — 2008. — 39. — (6). — Р. 471–475.

8. Dry eyes and corneal sensation after laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond laser flap creation: effect of hinge position, hinge angle, and flap thickness / A.Y. Mian [et al.] // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. — 2009. — 35. — (12). — P. 2092–2098.

About this article