july 17, 2024

RU/EN

Headings of Vestnik

April 2019, № 2 (220), pages 69-76

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-220-69

Shtukarev N.A. ANTI-CORRUPTION CULTURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL MEANS OF THE PERSONALITY SOCIALIZATIONThe current state of Russian society is characterized by the loss of vital meanings, the overestimation of values in the direction of their relativization, the fall in the level of spiritual and moral culture. In such conditions, the manifestation of social diseases and, above all, corruption is a regularity, not an accident. The existing system of legal countermeasures against coordination is not enough to overcome or minimize it. In this regard, we have proposed an alternative — to combat corruption by cultural means, using the anthropological potential of an anti-corruption culture as an effective means of socializing a person. The subject of the research was anti-corruption culture as an anthropological means of socialization of the individual. The aim of our study was to explicate the potential of an anti-corruption culture as a means of socializing the individual.
“Anti-corruption culture” to the process of socialization is a wide layer, which is seen in the intersection of values and norms of various types of cultures with anti-corruption potential (lawl, political, spiritual and moral culture). An empirical and theoretical research of scientific philosophical, cultural, pedagogical, law, and sociological literature has shown that anti-corruption culture is viewed from several perspectives. First, as a person’s ability to mentally and morally resist corruption. Secondly, as a system of knowledge, values, qualities and abilities of an individual. As well as the state of the individual, in the mind of which there is no place for corruption. In addition, we identified the anti-corruption potential of the main directions of socialization of the individual — the education system, the family, and political institutions. In particular, we substantiated the need to introduce anti-corruption education as a universal means of spiritual and legal socialization, the formation of anti-corruption blocks of academic disciplines. Political institutions were examined by us through the prism of introducing individuals to social design, developing new methods and means of fighting corruption. At the same time, the lack of an anti-corruption component of family education was established — the lack of individual orientation of such values as honor, duty, conscience, decency, and others.
Anti-corruption culture is an effective anthropological means of socialization of a person from the point of view of acquiring the latter of qualitatively new properties and characteristics expressed in terms of the “anti-corruption stance”, “anti-corruption orientation of the personality”. The result of the formation of anti-corruption culture is the spiritual enrichment of the individual, its moral, legal and political socialization.Key words: anti-corruption culture, anti-corruption stability of personality, spiritually-moral culture, legal socialization, political socialization, anti-corruption education, anti-corruption education.

Download

References:

1. Bim-Bad B.M., Gavrov S.N. Modernizaciya instituta sem'i: makrosociologicheskij, ekonomicheskij i antropologo-pedagogicheskij analiz [Modernization of the family institution: macrosociological, economic, and anthropological-pedagogical analysis]. M.: Intellektual'naya kniga — Novyj hronograf, 2010, 327 p.

2. Golubeva A.P. Spiritual culture as a factor of human socialization. Sociologiya v sovremennom mire: nauka, obrazovanie, tvorchestvo[Sociology in the modern world: science, education, creativity], 2005, no.7, pp. 314–316.

3. Gorbova V.V. Philosophical-anthropological dimension of corruption. Candidate's thesis. Voronezh, 2016, 137 p.

4. Kabanov P.A. The concept and content of anti-corruption education as a means of preventing corruption. YUridicheskie issledovaniya [Legal Studies], 2015, no. 2, pp. 12–27.

5. Kargapol'ceva N.A. Socialization of the individual in the educational context of the educational paradigm. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 11(160), 2013, pp. 231–233.

6. Kamenskij E.G. Corruption culture: theoretical conceptual construct. Vestnik Instituta sociologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology], 2014, no. 11, pp. 73–92.

7. Kamyu A. Buntuyushchij chelovek [The Rebellious Man]. M.: AST, 2017, 448 p.

8. Kon I.S. Sociologiya lichnosti [Sociology of personality]. M.: Politizdat, 1967, 383 p.

9. Kraevskij V.V. Education sciences and educational science (methodological problems of modern pedagogy). Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], 2009, no. 3. Available at: http://www.bim-bad.ru/biblioteka/article_full.php?aid=1440.

10. Lebedeva L.G., Urgalkin YU.A. Political culture as a factor in the socialization of Russian students. Vestnik Samarskogo municipal'nogo instituta upravleniya [Bulletin of the Samara Municipal Institute of Management], 2017, no. 4, pp. 132–140.

11. Matveeva A.I. Duhovnaya socializaciya lichnosti kak sociokul'turnaya osnova nacional'noj bezopasnosti Rossii [Spiritual socialization of personality as a sociocultural basis of the national security of Russia]. Izdatel'stvo “Buk”, 2017, 173 p.

12. Mudrik A.V. A man in the process of socialization: three hypostases. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tihonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Pedagogika. Psihologiya [Herald of St. Tikhon’s Orthodox Humanitarian University. Series 4: Pedagogy. Psychology], 2009, iss. 3(14), pp. 7–16 .

13. Neshataev I.G. The development of the concept of individual freedom in the philosophy of Hegel. Vestnik MGTU [Vestnik MGTU], 2000, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 425–436.

14. Rean A.A. Psihologiya lichnosti [Personality Psychology]. SPB.: Piter, 2016, 510 p.

15. Reshaeva N.YU. Anti-corruption education and its role in modern state policy. Nauchnoe periodicheskoe izdanie “CETERIS PARIBUS” [Scientific periodical “CETERIS PARIBUS”], 2016, no. 3, pp. 43–46.

16. Snashkov S.A. Legal culture of youth in the context of legal socialization (for example, the Republic of Tatarstan). Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya iiskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. V 3-h ch. [Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and artistic studies. Questions of theory and practice. In 3 parts], 2014, no. 10(48), part III, pp. 183–186.

17. Syuzeva N.V. Anti-corruption subculture of educational organization. Candidate's thesis. CHelyabinsk, 2016, 34 p.

18. Syuzeva N.V. From anti-corruption subculture to non-corruption cultur. Kul'tura i civilizaciya [Culture and civilization], 2015, no. 6, pp. 189–204.

19. Flier A.YA. Man and culture: contingency parameters. Kul'tura kul'tury [Culture of culture], 2015, pp. 1–16.

20. Frolov O.V. Philosophical and legal context of the teacher's corruption culture. Pravovaya kul'tura [Legal culture], 2018, no. 3(34), pp. 24–32.

21. SHredinger E. Kvantovyj kot vselennoj [The Quantum Cat of the Universe]. M.: Algoritm, 2017, 224 p.

22. Enshtejn, A. Citaty i aforizmy [Quotes and aphorisms]. M.: KoLibri, Azbuka-Attikus, 2015, 320 p.

23. Feder. law: adopted by the State Duma on June 21, 2001: approved by the Council of the Federation on June 29, 2001 “On Political Parties”. Available at: http:// www.pravo.gov.ru.

About this article

Author: Shtukarev N.A.

Year: 2019

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-220-69

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru