november 20, 2024

RU/EN

Headings of Vestnik

April 2019, № 2 (220), pages 57-68

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-220-57

Frolov O.V. CRISIS OF CULTURES ALLIANCE IN PROFESSIONAL PEDAGOGICAL ACTIVITYRecent scientific studies have argued that school culture is increasingly becoming a space of existential risk due to the axiological dysfunctions of modern sociocultural processes.
Professional pedagogical activity, in which the teacher reveals his individuality, realizes himself as a person, realizes talents, discovers his personal vocation and fulfills a social mission, is often built in such a way that generates and strengthens protest against his cultural expansion and militant monologism, becoming a latent end in itself traditional teaching practice.
As a result of my research, it was revealed that the acuteness of the axiological contradictions of the modern school is caused by the crisis state of the alliance of cultures — professional, interactive and legal, determining the teacher’s value status in the aggregate of creative self-expression and self-realization of a person who also has an arrogant self-sufficiency complex inseparable from the imperative nature of relationships with other participants in the educational process.
I have identified the main causes of the crisis, to which we attributed: ignoring the unique interactive nature of educational activities; the destruction of the moral paradigm of perception of the child as a “living fragment of culture” with its individual worldview and world perceptions; “Squeezing” the humanistic space of the school to the limits set by the total authority of the teacher; activation of destructive psychological attacks and provocations as a new hidden form of spiritual coercion, with the violation of the legitimate rights of the child.
As my research has shown, the crisis of the alliance of cultures is a violation of the motives and nuances of the teacher’s spiritual work, which destroys the cultural space of the school as a collective form of life activity.
I have confirmed that the “reconstruction” of positive and humanely oriented normative orders in modern school culture is possible and necessary, as the school continues to be the most important institution for rationing social interaction, mastering reference models of “correct” social behavior.Key words: activity, education, culture, culture of pedagogical activity, legal culture, dialogue culture, pedagogical values.

Download

References:

1. Archer M.S. Culture and agency, the place of culture in social theory. Cambridge University Press, 1996, p. 351.

2. Asadullin R.M. CHelovek v zerkale obrazovaniya [A man in the mirror of education]. M.: Nauka, 2014, 230 p.

3. Amonashvili SH.A. Osnovy gumannoj pedagogiki. Kniga 5. Uchitel’ [Fundamentals of humane pedagogy. Book 5. Teacher]. M.: Svet, 2013, 270 p.

4. Bagdasar’yan N.G. Global space of culture: breaks of modernity in trends and paradoxes. Kul’turologicheskij zhurnal [Cultural journal], 2011, no. 3(5).

5. Barkova E.V. Ecology of intercultural communications: searches and strategies for new paradigms. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 7, Filosofiya. Sociologiya i social’nye tekhnologii [Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Ser. 7, Philosophy. Sociology and social technology], 2011, no. 2(14), pp. 128–136.

6. Bim-Bad B.M. Iz razdumij uchitelya nakanune Goda uchitelya [From the thoughts of a teacher on the eve of the Year of the Teacher]. Available at: http://www.bim-bad.ru/biblioteka/article_full.php?aid=1577.

7. Botvinova A.V. Retrospective philosophical-psychological analysis of spirituality as a form of social being. Akmeologiya [Acmeology], 2004, no. 4, pp. 86–97.

8. Vargina E.A. Innovative approach to teaching humanities in high school. Aktual’nye voprosy razvitiya obrazovaniya i proizvodstva: tez. dokl. IV Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. 29–30 maya 2003 g. [Current Issues in the Development of Education and Production: proc. report IV Vseros. scientific-practical conf. May 29–30, 2003]. N.Novgorod: VGIPA, 2003, p. 69.

9. Veresov N., Mel’nikov A. Education and culture: unrealistic goals and real values. V perspektive kul’turologii. Povsednevnost’. YAzyk. Obshchestvo [In the perspective of cultural studies. Daily routine. Language. Society]. M.: Akademicheskij proekt, 2005, 593 p.

10. Erekesheva L.G. The concept of culture in theoretical sociology: the problem of definition. Kul’turologicheskij zhurnal [Cultural journal], 2016, no. 1(23).

11. Zolotkova YU.V. Cultural dialogue in the works of E. Montale and I. Brodsky. Voprosy kul’turologii [Questions of cultural science], 2010, no. 7, p. 109–114.

12. Ivanova D.N. Phenomenology as a methodology of pedagogical creativity. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta [Proceedings of the Saratov University], 2009, vol. 9, Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Pedagogika, iss. 3, pp. 22–26.

13. Karatygin V.G. Izbrannye stat’i [Selected articles]. M.:, L.: Muzyka, 1965, 352 p.

14. Kostenova T.P. Sovremennyj uchitel’ []. Available at: http://otkrytyjurok.rf/stat’i/. (Accessed 17.05.2011).

15. Krylova N.V. The theory of the “individuality” of a person in the scientific heritage of B.G. Ananeva. Filosofsko-kul’turologicheskie problemy identichnosti v kontekste sovremennosti : materialy mezhdunarodnoj konferencii “Kul’turnaya identifikaciya molodezhi v usloviyah globalizacii” [Philosophical-cultural problems of identity in the context of modernity: proc. of the international conference “Cultural identification of young people in the context of globalization”]. SPb. : Sankt-Peterburgskij gos. politekhnicheskij universitet, 2010, 492 p.

16. Maklyuen G.M. Ponimanie Media: Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding of Media: External Human Extensions]. M.; ZHukovskij: “KANON-press-C”, “Kuchkovo pole”, 2003, 464 p. ().

17. Mezhuev V.M. Reflections on culture and cultural studies: cultural studies in the context of modern humanitarian knowledge. Kul’turologicheskij zhurnal [Cultural Journal], 2010, no. 2.

18. Mlodik I. SHkola i kak v nej vyzhit’: vzglyad gumanisticheskogo psihologa [School and how to survive in it: a view of a humanistic psychologist]. M.: Genezis, 2008, 288 p.

19. Nekrasov S.I., Nekrasova N.A. Anthropic principle in the evolutionary paradigm. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental’nyh issledovanij [International Journal of Applied and Basic Research], 2010, no. 12, pp. 137–148.

20. Rezhabek E.YA. Cultural knowledge is a necessary component of culture. Kul’turologicheskij zhurnal [Cultural journal], 2011, no. 3(5).

21. Savruckaya E.P. The communication aspect of innovative transformations in the construction of social reality. Kul’turologicheskij zhurnal [Cultural journal], 2012, no. 3(9).

22. Sil’vestrov V.V. Kul’tura. Deyatel’nost’. Obshchenie [Culture Activity Communication]. M.: ROSSPEN, 1998, p. 405.

23. Struve P.B., Frank S.L. Essays on the philosophy of culture. Izbrannye sochineniya [Selected Works]. M. : ROSSPEN, 1999, pp. 132–133.

24. Ushinskij K.D. Man as a subject of education: the experience of pedagogical anthropology. Pedagogicheskie sochineniya: v 6 t. [Pedagogical works: in 6 t.]. M.: Pedagogika, 1990, vol. 5, 524 p.

25. Flier A.YA. Izbrannye raboty po teorii kul’tury [Selected works on the theory of culture]. M.:Soglasie, Artem, 2014, 560 p.

26. Smith D.W., Thomasson A.L. (eds.) Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind. Oxford, 2005, p. 7.

27. CHernova G.R., Slotina T.V. Psihologiya obshcheniya: Uchebnoe posobie [Psychology of communication: study guide]. SPb.: Piter, 2015, 240 p.

28. Kaffemanienė I., Masiliauskienė E., Melienė R., Miltenienė L. Educational Environment of the Modern School in the Aspects of Learning Factors, School Climate and Education Paradigms. Pedagogy, 2017, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 62–82.

About this article

Author: Frolov O.V.

Year: 2019

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-220-57

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru