February 2019, № 1 (219), pages 41-47

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-219-41

Starkova A.V. DISCOURSE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL RESEARCHESPedagogy as a humanities has a lot of methods, but due to the growing informatization of society, the primacy of the anthropocentric paradigm, and the increasing filling of pedagogical science with interdisciplinary methods and concepts, it becomes necessary to turn to some new methods and technologies that will allow us to measure interdisciplinary concepts that are firmly established in educational science. Over the past decades, the national methodology of pedagogical science has been enriched so much that the question of accumulated experience rethinking and its refinement has become acute. Pedagogical science seeks towards the humanitarian ideal of science, therefore modern researchers feel the need for modern methods that can isolate the necessary scientific knowledge from the flow of information.
In the given research, I believe that the discursive methods respond to the modern methodological needs of teachers-researchers and consider the discursive methods from the perspective of understanding the discourse within a three-tier system. Such a system is applicable to the discourse of scientific and pedagogical knowledge. For each level of the discourse structure, the most acceptable discourse method has been proposed. Discourse analysis is defined as the central and connecting link of discursive methods. I have discovered that the grounded theory and content analysis are suitable for analyzing the sources of information of the first structure. The second aspect of the discourse structure, which includes oral and written discourse practices, requires a more comprehensive method of analysis: discourse-analysis itself. The third aspect of the discourse structure is amenable to the study of conversion analysis.
I found that a researcher can use several discursive methods to analyze discursive practices corresponding to the discourse structure. In this regard, I proposed a “tree” of discursive methods, designed to rationally justify their relationship. Also, I concluded that a conglomerate of discursive methods allows us to go into the study of discourse in a complex, i.e. analyze the discourse at the cognitive, communicative and active levels.Key words: pedagogy, psychological and pedagogical research, modern methods, discourse, discourse analysis, discursive methods.

Download

References:

1. Vershlovskiy S.G., Matyushkina M.D. Kontent-analiz v pedagogicheskom issledovanii. Uchebnoe posobie. [Content analysis in pedagogical research. Tutorial]. Saint-Petersburg, 2006, 61 p.

2. Drobotenko Yu.B. Changes in the professional training of students of a pedagogical university in the conditions of modernization of pedagogical education of the Russian Federation. Doctor's thesis. Omsk, OmSPU, 2016, 519 p.

3. Yorgensen M., Fillips L. Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod. [Discourse analysis. Theory and method]. Thousand Oaks, 2008, 354 p.

4. Kubryakova E.S. On the installations of cognitive science and actual problems of cognitive linguistics. Voprosyi kognitivnoy lingvistiki [Questions of Cognitive Linguistics], 2004, no. 1, pp. 6–17.

5. Orehova E.A., Orehov A.I. New methodological approaches in pedagogical research. Sovremennyie problemyi nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education], 2015, no. 1 (part 1). Available at: http: www.science-education/ru/article/view (Accessed 8.05.2018).

6. Sikorskaya M.N. Konversatsionnyiy analiz: problemyi metoda [Conversion analysis: method problems]. On-line library BSU, 2011. Available at: http: www.elib.bsu.by/bitstream/123456789/1/189-192.pdf (Accessed 8.05.2018).

7. Ticher S., Meyer M., Vodak R., Vetter E. Metodyi analiz teksta i diskursa [Methods of text and discourse analysis]. SAGE Publications, 2009, 356 p.

8. Turchik A.V. Conversion analysis of speech interaction in a situation of a research interview. Candidate's thesis. Moscow, 2010, 173 p.

9. Adolphus M. How to use Discourse Analyses. Emerald Publishing. Available at: http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/research/guides/methods/discourse_analysis.htm?part=1 (Accessed 10.01.2019).

10. Angermuller J., Maingueneau D., Wodak R. The discourse studies reader: main currents in theory and analysis. John Benjamins B.V., 2014, 417 p.

11. Berns M. Concise Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Elsevier Science, 2009, 571 p.

12. Frawley W. International Encyclopedia of Linguistics: 4-Volume Set. Oxford University Press, USA, 2003, 2218 p.

13. Glynos J., Howarth D., Norval A., Speed E. Discourse Analysis: Varieties and Methods. National Centre for Research Methods, Centre for Theoretical Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences University of Essex, 2009, 41 p. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279668539_Discourse_Analysis_varieties_and_methods (Accessed 19.01.2019).

14. Jørgensen, M. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method / M. Jørgensen, L. Phillips. — SAGE Publications, 2002. — 240 p.

15. Van Dijk T.A., Schiffrin D., Tannen D., Hamilton H.E. Critical Discourse Analyses. The Handbook of discourse analysis. Blackwell Publishers, 2001, p. 352–371.

About this article

Author: Starkova A.V.

Year: 2019

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-219-41

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru