november 20, 2024

RU/EN

Headings of Vestnik

May 2018, № 5 (217), pages 6-14

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-217-6

Bizyuk A.P., Kacz E.E., Kolosova T.A., Sorokin V.M. FACTOR ANALYSIS IN THE NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS IN DYSORPHOGRAPHYThe number of children who have problems with mastering written language and the rules of the native language in Russian educational schools, according to various authors, is tens of percent. At the same time, the brain precondition of this phenomenon, worsening the social adaptation of children, remain underdeveloped.
In the present article, an attempt was made to identify discriminatory neuropsychological indicators that prevent the formation of spelling competence of schoolchildren. The study of writing disorders in younger schoolchildren was carried out using specially selected texts for dictation and cheating, after which a factor analysis was undertaken of the results of a study of two groups of children (with high spelling competence and dysorphography — 50 and 24 schoolchildren, respectively) in 20 functional tests. The subject of the analysis was the differences found when comparing the factor structures for the two groups. Neuropsychological assessment was performed only on those indicators, the expressed factor values of which were found only in one of the groups and were absent in the other. According to our assumption, they can be considered as variants of possible prerequisites for success or failure in mastering the rules of the Russian language.
As a result of the qualitative analysis, four types of deficiency were identified, characterizing the weak functional units in the implementation of spelling skills in children with dysorphography. Specific methods whose indicators turned out to be significant for solving the task include: arithmetic calculation, understanding of metaphors, test for reciprocal coordination, effective execution of a proof-reading test in Amatuni’s modification, lack of mirror phenomena in Henry Head test, visual memory and test “Fence” with its load on dynamic praxis as a programmatically organized action.
An end-to-end analysis of the totality of the obtained data allows us to conclude that there are at least four brain deficits in children with dysorphography: imperfect inter-hemispheric interaction, insufficient algorithmic component of thinking and activity, weakness of optical-spatial concepts and deficiency of motivational and energy potential.Key words: dysorphography, writing disorders, younger students, cognitive processes, neuropsychology, factor analysis.

Download

References:

1. Azova O.A. The system of speech therapy work on the correction of dysorphography in younger schoolchildren. Extended abstract of candidate's thesis. M., 2006, 26 p.

2. Bizyuk A.P. Kompendium metodov nejropsihologicheskogo issledovaniya [Compendium of methods of neuropsychological research]. SPb.: Rech'., 2005, 400 p.

3. Dmitrova E.D., Vizel' T.G. Dysorography and middle and high school students: Diagnosis and correction. Prakticheskaya psihologiya i logopediya [Practical psychology and speech therapy], 2005, no. 1, pp. 34–38.

4. Gorbunova N.E. The problem of the formation of the motivational basis of dysorphography prevention among students in an inclusive education. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii [Pedagogical education in Russia], 2016, no. 3, pp. 107–112.

5. Eleckaya O.V., Loginova E.A., SHCHukina D.A. Scientific and theoretical foundations of speech therapy for the correction of dysorphography in fifth graders. Nauchno-metodicheskij ehlektronnyj zhurnal ”Koncept” [Scientific-methodical electronic journal ”Concept”], 2015, no. S23, pp. 36–40. Available at: http://e-koncept.ru/2015/75285.htm.

6. Eleckaya O.V., Smirnova V.P., Hvostova O.A., Kulikova N.S. Approbation of the model of speech therapy diagnostics of the educational activity of younger schoolchildren with dysorphography in a special (correctional) school. Nauchno-metodicheskij ehlektronnyj zhurnal ”Koncept” [Scientific-methodical electronic journal ”Concept”], 2015, no. S23, pp. 11–15. Available at: http://e-koncept.ru/2015/75280.htm.

7. Iberla K. Faktornyj analiz [Factor analysis]. M.: Statistika. 1980, 399 p.

8. Inshakova O.B., Nazarova A.A. Metodika vyyavleniya dizorfografii u mladshih shkol'nikov [Method for detecting dysorphography in younger schoolchildren]. M.: V.Sekachev, 2013, 72 p.

9. Luriya A.R. Ocherki psihofiziologii pis'ma [Essays on the psychophysiology of writing]. M.: APN RSFSR., 1950, 84 p.

10. Luriya A.R. Vysshie korkovye funkcii cheloveka i ih narusheniya pri lokal'nyh porazheniyah mozga [Higher human cortical functions and their abnormalities in local brain lesions]. M.: Izd-vo MGU., 1962, 431 p.

11. Mikadze YU.V. Some methodological issues of qualitative and quantitative analysis in neuropsychological diagnostics. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psihologiya [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14: Psychology], 2012, no. 2, pp. 96–103.

12. Nazarova A.A. Dynamic analysis of the process of the formation of the spelling skill of writing in the general sample of younger schoolchildren. European Social Science Journal, 2012, no. 10-1(26), pp. 177–184.

13. Okun' YA. Faktornyj analiz [Factor analysis]. M: Statistika, 1974, 200 p.

14. Prishchepova I.V. On the issue of dysorphography in elementary school students of a general education school with speech disorders. Patologiya rechi: istoriya izucheniya, diagnostika, preodolenie [Pathology of speech: history of study, diagnosis, overcoming]. SPB.: Obrazovanie, 1992, pp. 124–131.

15. Prishchepova I.V. The nature of spelling errors in the written work of students with dysorphography and their peers with normal speech development. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and practice of social development], 2014, no. 12, pp. 64–67.

16. Harman G. Sovremennyj faktornyj analiz [Modern factor analysis]. M.: Statistika, 1972, 489 p.

17. Cvetkova L.S. Nejropsihologie scheta, pis'ma i chteniya: narushenie i vosstanovlenie [Neuropsychology of counting, writing and reading: violation and recovery]. M.: ”YUrist””, 1997, 256 p.

18. SHaripova N.YU. Typology of dysorphography in secondary school students. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Problems of modern education], 2013, no. 2, pp. 152–159.

19. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci, 1992, 15(1):20-5.

20. Luzzatti S., Br. Stemmer, H.A. Whitaker (Eds.) Acquired reading and writing disorders. Handbook of the neuroscience of language. Amsterdam: Academic Press, 2008, pp. 209–218.

21. Miceli G., Capasso R. Spelling and dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2006, 23 (1), pp. 110–134.

22. Mishkin M., Ungerleider L.G., Macko K.A. Object Vision and Spatial Vision: Two Cortical Pathways. Trends in Neuroscience, 1983, 6, pp. 414–417.

23. Pennington B.F. From single to multiple-deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 2006, 10(2).

About this article

Authors: Bizyuk A.P., Kats E.E., Kolosova T.A., Sorokin V.M.

Year: 2018

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-217-6

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru