|
|
|
July 2017, № 8 (208), pages 45-47doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-208-45
Gluhih M.A., Chinyaeva Y.Z. MICROBIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF SOIL AS A FACTOR OF EFFICIENCY OF STRAW USE One of the contentious issues, especially in recent years, in connection with the decline in the number of livestock and its need for straw, is its use. In the erosion-hazardous conditions on the lungs according to the granulometric composition of soils, straw is needed, both to protect the soil from erosion, and in the form of organic fertilizer. In domestic literature, it is often considered a good organic fertilizer for other soils. When it is introduced, the biological activity of the soil, the availability of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium to plants, the availability of labile organic substances, humus content, and the productivity of cultivated crops are increased. However, when the biological activity of the soil increases, its mineralization increases, so the introduction of more organic matter into the soil than required to maintain the humus reserve is not effective. When introducing straw into the soil, the phytosanitary situation worsens. Phytotoxins — the products of vital activity of different groups of microorganisms, leached from straw, have a negative effect on plants. In addition, bacterial and fungal colonies formed in the surface layer of the soil in the presence of plant residues are harmful, causing the spread of diseases and the accumulation of toxins. In this connection, in the chernozem soils of the Trans-Ural region, the introduction of straw does not increase the productivity of cultivated crops. What is associated with the lack of increase in productivity, requires additional research. One thing is clear: the biological activity of chernozem soils increases equally, as with the introduction of straw, and when it is burned. And the supply of plants with nitrate forms of nitrogen and mobile phosphorus does not decrease.Key words: straw, soil biological activity, organic matter, straw application to soil, burning, phytosanitary conditions, phytotoxins, soil respiration, bacteria, fungi, humus.
References:
1. Kushnirenko Y.D., Yumashev Kh.S., Bragin V.N., Zakharova I.A. The influence of straw on the agrophysical properties of leached chernozem and the productivity of spring wheat cultivated on a permanent plot / Problems of the agricultural sector of the Southern Urals and ways to solve them: Sat. sci. tr. / CHAU. Issue. 8 / Ed. V.A. Linden. Chelyabinsk: ChGAU, 2008. P. 224-231.
2. Sinyavsky I.V. Agrochemical and ecological aspects of fertility of chernozems of the forest-steppe Zauralye: dis. ... doсt. Biol. sciences. Tyumen, 2002. 275 p.
3. Lupwayi N.Z., Lafond G.P., May W.E., Holzapfel C.B., Lemke R.L. Intensification of field pea production // Impact on soil microbiology Agronomy Journal. 2012. Т. 104, № 4. С. 1189-1196.
4. Kushnirenko Yu.D., Plekhanova T.N. Influence of a long systematic introduction of straw and nitrogen fertilizers on the intensity of microbiological processes in leached chernozem // New adaptive technologies for the production of farming and livestock products (a collection of scientific works). Miass: Geotur, 2000. P. 118-135.
5. Glukhikh M.A. Theoretical bases of soil treatment on the example of the Trans-Urals. Saarbrücken: LAR LAMBERT, 2013. 189 p.
6. Chinyaeva Yu.Z., Schelkanova A.V., Shelkanov M.A. Effect of burning straw on microbiological activity of leached chernozem // Electronic scientific journal. 2017. No. 1-1 (16). Pp. 27-30.
7. Zhou P., Li Y., Tong C., Ge T., Wu J., Sheng H. Lower c sequestration and n use efficiency by straw incorporation than manure amendment on paddy soils // Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2016. Т. 219. С. 93-100.
8. Ellis R.J., Neish B., Weightman A.J., Fry J.C., Trett M.W., Best J. George, Morgan P. Comparison of microbial and meiofaunal community analyses for determining impact of heavy metal contamination // Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2001. Т. 45, № 3. С. 171-185.
9. Phillip R. No tillage agriculture // Science. 1980, 208, 4448. Р.1108-1113.
10. Pokatilova A.N. Acid-base buffering of chernozem soils of the southern Transural region and its change under anthropogenic influence: dis. ... cand. s.-kh. sciences. Chelyabinsk, 2008. 168 p.
11. Tarkalson, D., B. Brown, H. Kok, and D.L. Bjorneberg. 2009. Western Nutrient Management Conf. Proc. 8:32-37.
12. Matveeva E.Yu. Characteristics of arable, fallow and virgin chernozem leached Chelyabinsk region: the author's abstract. dis. ... cand. biol. sciences. Tyumen, 2009. 17 pp.
13. Ufimtseva L.V., Kalganov A.A. Influence of long-term flood with surface waters with high mineralization on group and fractional composition of the meadow soils humus // Contemporary Problems of Ecology. 2011. Т. 4, № 5. С. 550-553.
14. Bécaert V., Samson R., Deschênes L. Chemosphere. Effect of 2,4-D contamination on soil functional stability evaluated using the relative soil stability index (RSSI) 2006. Т. 64. № 10. С. 1713-1721.
About this article
Authors: Chinyaeva Yu.Z., Gluhih M.A.
Year: 2017
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-208-45
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|