december 22, 2024

RU/EN

Headings of Vestnik

June 2017, № 7 (207), pages 34-37

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-207-34

Agarkova O.A., Gubanova Y.V. ARGUMENTATION AS A STRATEGY OF LINGUISTIC MANIPULATION The theory of argumentation is studied by linguistics, mathematics, informatics, jurisprudence and other sciences. The complexity of argumentation makes it possible to consider this phenomenon from the several approaches: communicative, psychological, cognitive and pragmatic. To date, the study of the theory of argumentation as a branch of psycholinguistics is relevant. The approach lies in a search of efficient component of communicative strategy of argumentation. The effectiveness of a communicative strategy is defined by appropriate choice of linguistic means which allow to build smoothly a chain of arguments, state the main idea fast and clearly, and emotionally influence on communicator. Clearly built sequence of arguments increases the effectiveness of argumentation as a strategy of speech influence. However this issue is not clarified enough in papers of native and foreign linguists. This paper refers to pragmalinguistic aspect of argumentation in modern literacy. For analysis there were chosen texts of two different culture writers: American (E. Gilbert) and French (A. Gavalda). Within the aspect there were analysed linguistic means of argumentation according to classification of N.A. Oshchepkovoy. The contextual analysis subdivided linguistic means into five groups: expositive verbs, utterances of agreement/disagreement, prohibition statements, adversative linking words and contrast adverbs, adverbs of reason. The quantitive method helped to identify the most frequent linguistic means for this material. These means are utterances of agreement/disagreement and adverbs of reason. Among the analysed means expositive verbs are in fewer.Key words: argumentation, speech influence, speech strategy, linguistic means, argument, communicative situation, pragmalinguistic approach.

Download

References:

1. Baranov, A.N. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya argumentacii (kognitivnyj podhod): dis. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.19 / A.N. Baranov. — M.: Akademiya nauk SSSR, Institut russkogo yazyka, 1990. — 378 s.

2. Gavenko, S.V. Analiz argumentativnogo ehffekta ocenochnoj semantiki v estestvennom yazyke (na materiale amerikanskih tekstov) [EHlektronnyj resurs]. — URL: http://www.dialog-21.ru/Archive/2001/volume1/1_8.htm (data obrashcheniya: 25.07.17).

3. Gil'mutdinova, N.A. Logika i teoriya argumentacii: ucheb. posobie / N.A. Gil'mutdinova. — Ul'yanovsk: UlGTU, 2006. — 111 s.

4. Grigor'eva, V.S. Argumentativnyj diskurs v kognitivno-kommunikativnom aspekte / V.S. Grigor'eva // Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki. — 2008. — №1. — S. 24—31.

5. Issers, O.S. Rechevoe vozdejstvie: ucheb. posobie dlya studentov, obuchayushchihsya po special'nosti “Svyazi s obshchestvennost'yu” / O.S. Issers. — M.: Flinta: Nauka, 2009. — 224 s.

6. Koshevarova, YU.A. Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskij analiz argumentativnogo diskursa (na materiale hudozhestvennyh proizvedenij anglijskih i amerikanskih pisatelej HKH veka): dis. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.04 / YU.A. Koshevarova. — Ufa: BGU, 2006. — 182 s.

7. Oshchepkova, N.A. Strategii i taktiki v argumentativnom diskurse: pragmalingvisticheskij analiz ubeditel'nosti rassuzhdeniya: dis. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.19 / N.A. Oshchepkova. — Kaluga: KGPU im K.EH. Ciolkovskogo, 2004. — 199 s.

8. Oshchepkova, N.A. YAzykovye sredstva opisaniya argumentativnosti / N.A. Oshchepkova // Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2011. — №6(44). — S. 228—233.

9. Sternin, I.A. Prakticheskaya ritorika: ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov / I.A. Sternin. — 5-e izd., ster. — M.: Akademiya, 2008. — 270 s.

10. Fanyan, N.YU. Argumentaciya kak lingvopragmaticheskaya struktura: dis. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.19 / N.YU. Fanyan. — Krasnodar: KGU, 2000. — 354 s.

11. Filicheva, O.S. Strategiya argumentacii i sposoby ee realizacii v nauchnom diskurse / O.S. Filicheva // The way of science: International scientific journal. — 2015. — №1(11). — S. 110—112.

12. SHelestyuk, E.V. Rechevoe vozdejstvie: ontologiya i metodologiya issledovaniya: dis. … doktora filol. nauk: 10.02.19 / E.V. SHelestyuk. — CHelyabinsk: Izd-vo CHelyabinskogo gos. un-ta, 2009. — 356 s.

13. Aakhus, M. Communication as design / M. Aakhus // Communication Monographs. — New Jersey: The State University of New Jersey. — 2007. — №74(1). — R. 112—117.

14. Aakhus, M. Deliberation digitized: Designing disagreement space through communication-information services / M. Aakhus // Journal of argumentation in context. — Amsterdam: J. Benjamins publishing company. — 2013. — №2(1). — R. 101—113.

15. Abuczki, A. The role of discourse markers in the generation and interpretation of discourse structure and coherence / A. Abuczki // 3rd IEEE International conference on cognitive infocommunications. — CogInfoCom 2012. — R. 531—536.

16. Blair, J.A. Rhetoric, dialectic, and logic as related to argument / J.A. Blair // Philosophy and Rhetoric. — Pennsylvania: Penn state university press. — 2012. — №45(2). — R. 148—164.

17. Eemeren, F.H. van, Grootendorst R. A systematic theory of argumentation: the pragma-dialectical approach / F.H. van Eeremen, R. Grootendorst. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. — 217 p.

18. Emediato, W. L’argumentation dans le discours d’information médiatique / W. Emediato // Argumentation et analyse du discours. — Tel-Aviv: Université de Tel-Aviv. — 2016. — №7 — R. 1—20.

19. Gavalda, A. Ensemble c’est tous / A. Gavalda. — Paris : J’ai lu, 2005. — 325 p.

20. Gavalda, A. Mathilde / A. Gavalda. — Paris: Éditions le dilettante, 2014. — 288 p.

21. Gilbert, E. Eat, pray, love / E. Gilbert. — New York: Penguin books, 2015. — 366 p.

22. Gilbert, E. The signature of all things / E. Gilbert. — New York: Bloomsauly, 2013. — 340 p.

23. Lewinski, M. Argumentative discussion: The rationality of what? / M. Lewinski // Topoi: An international review of philosophy. — Lisbon: Springer. — 2015. — №36. — R. 1—14.

24. Webber, B. Discourse structure and language technology / B. Webber, M. Egg, V. Kordoni // Natural language ingineerimg. — Cambridge: Cambridge university press. — 2011. — № 18(4). — R. 437—490.

About this article

Authors: Gubanova Yu.V., Agarkova O.A.

Year: 2017

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-207-34

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru