Vestnik On-line
Orenburg State University december 06, 2021   RU/EN
Headings of Vestnik
Pedagogics
Psychology
Other

Search
Vak
Антиплагиат
Orcid
Viniti
ЭБС Лань
Rsl
Лицензия Creative Commons

May 2016, № 5 (193)



Speranskaya N.I., Yatsevich O.E. TO THE QUESTION OF ESTIMATION OF KNOWLEDGE OF STUDENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: THE MARK, CREDIT, RATING, MONITORINGThis article discusses different approaches to the evaluation of students and pupils' knowledge at different stages of national education (preschool, primary, basic, secondary complete and higher), identifies the advantages and disadvantages of various control forms (a traditional mark, testing, rating, two-point scale system), the need for their motivating role is emphasized. Particular attention is paid to such controlfunctions as the implementation of feedback in the organization of the educational process and determining its degree of success at different levels: the individual student, to the University as a whole. The authors describe in sufficient detail the rating and objectified system of control — EDUCON used in Tyumen industrial University. The article focuses on the need to use multilateral (self-evaluation, evaluation of classmates and teacher), qualitative, verbal definition of the learning progress of students, ensuring the realization of student-oriented learning, and emphasizes the viability of the active teacher's role in the choice of those or other means, forms and methods of control. The authors concluded that only the combined use of various forms and methods of assessment provides effective feedback and implementation of all functions.Key words: mark, valuation, rating, monitoring, testing, student-centered education, control, motivation.

Download
References:

1. Speranskaya N.I., Yatsevich O.E.Innovative approaches to foreign languages teaching at technical universities: slow education (pro et contra)// Theory and practice of social development. 2015. № 19. С. 211-213.

2. Zagvyazinsky V. I. learning Theory: Modern interpretation: Textbook.The Handbook for students of higher pedagogical institutions.—M.:Publishing center "Akademiya", 2001. P. 173.

3. Galustyan O. V. Control of students " knowledge of a foreign language in a technical University // proceedings of the Herzen state pedagogical University. A. I. Herzen. 2008. No. 49. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontrol-znaniy-studentov-po-inostrannomu-yazyku-v-tehnicheskom-vuze (accessed: 27.05.2016).

4. Grigorieva N. G. New approaches to the control of students " knowledge of a foreign language in a technical University//Modern problems of the theory and practice of education at the University. Collection of scientific works. Issue 17. No. 2014. P.30-34.

5. Amonashvili sh. a. Humane-personal approach to children. — M.: Institute of practical psychology; Voronezh: Publishing house NPO "MODEK", 1998. P. 17.

6. Tabueva I. N. The specificity of teaching a foreign language in a technical University // proceedings of the Samara scientific center of RAS. 2012. No. 2-4. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/spetsifika-prepodavaniya-inostrannogo-yazyka-v-tehnicheskom-vuze (accessed: 27.05.2016).

7. The regulations on rating system of evaluation of student performance. QMS P-17/03-2012. The Protocol of the academic Council from 29.06.2012 No. 11.

8. Taranukha S. N., Sokolov S. S. Computerization in the innovative educational process//Bulletin of state University of sea and river fleet named after Admiral S. O. Makarov. Issue № 1 (5) / 2010.

9. Naseikina L. F. Interactive e-textbooks at modern open education //Vestnik OGU №5 (111) 2010. S. 30-35.

10. Naseikina L. F. using of electronic educational editions and resources as components of development of information educational environment of the University // Vestnik OGU №2 (121) 2011. S. 248.253.

11. Artemova L. K. the possibility of a modular approach and the score-rating system of evaluation of quality of education // Professional education in Russia and abroad. 2013. No. 3 (11). P. 114-117.

12. Bogdan N. B. Point-rating system as a method of assessing the quality of education in higher school // Vestnik of SUSU. Series: Education. Pedagogical science. 2010. No. 3 (179). URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ballno-reytingovaya-sistema-kak-metod-otsenki-kachestva-obrazovaniya-v-vuze (accessed: 27.05.2016).

13. Yershova O. V., Chuprova L. V., Mullin R. E., O. A. Mishurina Implementation of rating system of evaluation of educational achievements of students of technical University // Modern problems of science and education. — 2014. — No. 6.;URL: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=16471 (accessed: 27.05.2016).

14. Ososkova I. Z. the Use of rating system of knowledge of students of technical universities // international journal of experimental education. — 2013. — No. 10-1. — Pp. 158-159.

15. URL: http://www.expeducation.ru/ru/article/view?id=4147 (accessed: 27.05.2016).

16. Lomonosov M. V. On the upbringing and education/ Comp. Tatyana Butorina. — M.: Pedagogika, 1991. P. 166.


About this article

Authors: Speranskaya N.I., Yatsevich O.E.

Year: 2016


Editor-in-chief
Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

Crossref
Cyberleninka
Doi
Europeanlibrary
Googleacademy
scienceindex
worldcat
© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru
1999–2021 © CIT OSU