|
|
|
Erokhina Е.V., Letuta Т.V., Shagivaleeva I.Z. ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF CIVIL RIGHTS PROTECTION IN ORENBURG REGION: THEORETICAL AND APPLIED RESEARCH Study alternative forms of civil rights protection, which traditionally includes arbitration and mediation, assumes importance due to the need to expand the scope of their application in Russia. The study materials of the State Archive of Orenburg region and the Documentation Center of the Modern History of the Orenburg region has revealed a number of significant moments in the history of alternative forms of civil rights protection in the Orenburg region, and distinguish two types of arbitration forms of civil rights protection. Comparison of the key features of arbitration in the pre-revolutionary, Soviet and modern period of Russian Law development and the court practice allowed us to estimate the status of the arbitrator and mediator (with fiduciary theory of judging), the principle of competence and the principle of confidentiality in the modern arbitration. Forming the modern legal regulation of alternative forms of civil rights protection advocated the need for consider foreign legislation and peculiarities of the Russian cultural heritage. On the basis of statistical data and surveys in the framework of ascertaining experiment formed conclusions about the practical need for extending the application of alternative forms of civil rights protection, and legal measures aimed at promoting these forms. In particular, the need to consolidate the principle of legislative competence; to reduce the role of the principle of confidentiality; concrete definition in Law alternative mediation procedures (promoting mediation, evaluative mediation, negotiation), the mechanism of their implementation; the proclamation in Law decision of the arbitration court in all cases be final; the introduction to the Russian practice online dispute resolution.Key words: alternative forms of protection, arbitration, mediation, international acts.
References:
1. VolinА.А. Economic disputes in mediation courts. — Moscow. — 1962. — 50p.
2. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union 2013/11 / EC on 21 May 2013 on the alternative consumer disputes and on changes in the Rules (EC) 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR) http://base.garant.ru/70500562/#ixzz3u80EtzFp
3. ErokhinaЕ.V. Sources of legal regulation for conciliation procedures in the resolution of civil disputes// Russian justice. 2015. №7. pp. 28-31.
4. Lapaeva V.V. Russian philosophy of Law in the context of the Western legal philosophical tradition// Issues of Philosophy. 2010. http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=136&Itemid=52
5. LetutaТ.V. Alternative ways of resolving civil disputes in the Orenburg region: history and prospective// Vestnik of Orenburg State University. 2015. №3. pp. 109-115.
6. Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire. [1st edition]. — St. — Petersburg. — 1830. Vol. 14. — №10222. — pp. 66-68//http://www.nlr.ru/e-res/law_r/search.php
7. Resolution of the Council of Ministers of USSR on 23 July 1959 "On the improvement of public arbitrage"// Collection of Resolutions. — 1959. — №15.
8. The research results to identify the legal culture level of Orenburg region population.
9. Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire// http://civil.consultant.ru/reprint/books/238/
10. Shagivaleeva I. Z.Mediationas an alternative way of resolving legal disputes// Education & Science: Fundamentals, Technologies, Innovations. Proceedings of the international scientific conference dedicated to the 60th anniversary of the Orenburg State University. Orenburg, 2015. pp. 94-97.
11. Ethan J. Leib, David L. Ponet& Michael Serota A Fiduciary Theory of Judging // CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEWВ 2013. Vol. 101. N 3 http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/a-fiduciary-theory-of-judging
About this article
Authors: Erohina E.V., Letuta T.V., Shagivaleeva I.Z.
Year: 2015
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|