Solodilova I. A. METAPHOR: COGNITIVE BASIS OF VALUATIONThe article deals with the problem of identity and analogy as the foundation of metaphor creation which is regarded with the help of cognitive metaphor theories being critically analyzed. Metaphoric identity of real objects is considered not as a really existing quality, but as a phenomenon of intentional origin which finally defines the functionality of metaphor and its evaluative character.Key words: metaphor; theory of conceptual metaphor; blending theory; identity; intentionality; evaluative character.
References:
1. Baranov A. N. About the types of metaphorical models // Voprosy jasykosnanija. — 2003. — №2. — P. 73 — 94.
2. Budajev E. V. Formation of the cognitive theory of metaphor // Lingvokulturologija — Vyp. 1. — Jekaterinburg. — 2007. — С. 16-32.
3. Vygotskij L. S. Thought and language // The problems of the general psychology: collected works in 6 vol. — М. — 1992. — С. 6 — 361.
4. Lebedeva S. V. Subkova O. S. Metaphor as a lingvosemiotical model: semiogenesis and interactional opportunities // Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki. — 2011. — №3. — С. 112 — 120.
5. Lakoff G. Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. M. — 2004. 256 p.
6. Solodilova I. F. Valuation as a type of cognitive activity and component of lexical meaning // Vestnik orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta — 2011. — №11. — С. 86 — 93.
7. Kchrushcheva O. A. Blending in the system of word-formation // Vestnik
orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta — 2009. — №11. — С. 95 — 101.
8. Tshudinov A. P. Russia in a metaphorical mirror: a cognitive study of the political metaphor. — Jekaterinburg. — 2001. 238 p.
9. Tshudinov A. P. metaphorical mosaic in the modern political communication — Jekaterinburg. — 2003. 248 p.
10. Beiβner K. I see, what you mean – Metaphorische Konzepte in der (fremdsprachigen) Bedeutungskonstruktion. – Frankfurt a. Main: Lang. – 2002. 278 S
11. Brinker K. Linguistische Textanalyse. Eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden. – Berlin: Erich Schmidt. – 4. Auflage – 1997. 150 S.
12. Dröβiger H_H. Metaphorik und Metonymie im Deutschen. – Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovaи, 2007. 370 S.
13. Duden Bedeutungswörterbuch. – 2., völlig bearb. u. erweitert. Auflage. Herausgegeben von W. Müller. – Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, Zürich: Dudenverlag, 1985. – 797 S.
14. Fauconnier G., Tuerner M. Conceptual integration network. In: Cognitive Science 22 (2). – 1998. – P. 133-187.
15. Fauconnier G., Tuerner M. The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books. – 2002. 37 p.
16. Grady J., Taub S., Morgan S. Primitive and compound metaphors // Conceptual structure, discourse and language. – A. Goldberg. Stanford. – 1996. P. 267 – 290.
17. Grass G. Mein Jahrhundert. 3. ungekürzte Ausgabe. – München: Deutscher Taschenbuchverlag, 2002. – 383 S.
18. Kövecses Z. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. – Oxford: University Press – 2002. 285 p.
19. Lakoff G. Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago; London; The Univ. of Chicago Press. – 1980. 276 p.
20. Mueller_Stahl A. Hannah. 2. Auflage. – Berlin: Taschentuchverlag GmbH. – 2006. – 134 S.
21. Ritchie D. "ARGUMENT IS WAR" – Or is it a Game of Chess? Multiple Meaning in the Analysis of Implicit Metaphors // Metaphor and Symbol. – 2003. – №2. – Vol. 18. P 233-244.
22. Spellmann B., Ullman J., Holyoak K. A. Coherence Model of Cognitive Consistency: Dynamics of Attitude Change During The Persian Gulf War // Jornal of Social Issues. – 1993. – Vol. 49. P. 147-165.
23. Taylor J. R. Cognitive Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press. – 2002. 456 p.
24. Weinrich H. Semantik der kühnen Metapher. // Sprache in Texten. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett. – 1976c. – S. 295-316.
About this article
Author: Solodilova I.A.
Year: 2013
|