Vestnik On-line
Orenburg State University june 30, 2024   RU/EN
Headings of Vestnik
Pedagogics
Psychology
Other

Search
Vak
Антиплагиат
Orcid
Viniti
ЭБС Лань
Rsl
Лицензия Creative Commons

2012, № 3 (139)



Malyutin M.A. SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE AS A SIGN OF EXPERTISEStudied the meaning and definition of the legal regulation of "special knowledge" as in the material and procedural legal relations, as well as scientific understanding of the term as a sign of expertise. Revealed the essential features of this sign, knowledges, that can be special, and also range of persons who may have such knowledge. In accordance with the results of the analysis of the essential features, author proposed definition of the term "special knowledge".Key words: Special knowledge, expertise, expert, specialist

Download
References:

1. Avdjukov M.G., Klejman A.F., Treushnikov M.K. The basic lines of a bourgeois civil procedural right. — М: Moscow State University Publishing house, 1978. P. 97.

2. Balakshin V.S. The Expert's statement as an evidentiary fact on criminal case // Legality. 1999. № 1. P. 37–40.

3. Gauhman L.D. Legal examination on criminal cases // Legality. 2000. № 4. P. 21–24.

4. Gromov N.A., Smorodinova A.G., V. Zakljuchenie eksperta's Nightingales: from opinion of the jurist to conclusions of the physician (the practice review) // the Russian justice. 1998. № 8. P. 29–30.

5. Dudlov A.V. Question of the theory of judicial examination in the Soviet criminal trial. — Minsk.: 1959.

6. Zukov G.G. Znachenie's plovers of special knowledge for investigation and the form of their use // Kriminalistichesky examination. 1996.

7. Plovers of the General questions of use of special knowledge in the course of preliminary investigation // Kriminalistichesky examination. 1966. P. 113–114.

8. Konev N.A. Legal examination in civil process: pro et contra // the Russian justice. 2006. №1. P. 9–11.

9.Koruhov U.G. Legal and legal examinations in criminal trial // Legality. 2000. № 1. P. 39.

10. Kuziakin JU.P. Special of knowledge in manufacture on affairs about administrative offenses//the Law and the right. 2006. № 7. P. 40–42.

11. Mohov A.A. — medical examination on a civil case: "typical errors" at statement of the task to the expert and a way of their elimination//Arbitration and civil process. 2003. № 2. P. 22–23.

12. Orlov JU.K. Expert's statement's eagles and its estimation on criminal cases. — М: the Lawyer, 1995. P. 6–7.

13. The Russian E.R. Judicial examination in civil, arbitration, administrative and criminal trial. — М: Norm, 2005. P. 24.

14. Sahnova T.V. Judicial examination. — М: Gorodes, 2000. P. 12.

15. Judicial examination in arbitration process / Otv. red. D.V.Goncharov, I.V.Reshetnikovoj. М: Volters Kluver, 2007. P. 57.

16. Eisman A.A. Expert's statement (Structure and a scientific substantiation). — М: Iurid. Lit., 1967. P. 91.

17. Jann P. S. Legal examination in criminal case // Legality. 2001. № 9. P. 21–24.


About this article

Author: Malyutin M.A.

Year: 2012


Editor-in-chief
Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

Crossref
Cyberleninka
Doi
Europeanlibrary
Googleacademy
scienceindex
worldcat
© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru
1999–2024 © CIT OSU