Kondratiev E.A. FRAGMENTARY ART STRUCTURE: AESTHETIC AND INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACHES TO THE INTERPRETATION The subject of this article is the review of a number of contemporary methodological approaches to the study of art structures. In particular, the author investigates the role of a constructive and creative role of a part, a fragment, a figurative element, a singular sign within the limits of art unit. This analysis applies primarily to the material of art of the twentieth century, however, retrospection in the field of classical art admits. Key words: fragment, structure, sign, ambivalence, connotation, reference, interpretation.
References:
1. Baxandall M. Patterns of intention: on the historical explanation of pictures. М., 2003.
2. Barthes R. The pleasure of the text. М., 1994.
3. Baudrillard J. Passwords. E., 2000.
4. Wцlfflin H. Principles of art history. М., 2002.
5. Ginzburg C. Myths — Emblems — Clues. М., 2004.
6. Damisch H. A theory of /cloud/: toward a history of painting. SPb., 2003.
7. Didi-Huberman G. What we see, what we look. SPb., 2001.
8. Dragomoshenko A. Phosphorus. SPb., 1994.
9. Lacan J. The seminars. Book 11. М., 2004.
10. Lotman Y. The structure of the artistic text. SPb., 1998.
11. Merlo-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception. SPb., 1999.
12. Ranciere J. The Aesthetic unconscious. SPb., 2004.
13. Sartre J.-P. The imaginary. SPb., 2001.
14. Sokolov M. The time and the place. М., 2002.
15. Frankastel P. The figure and the place. SPb., 2005.
16. Foucault M. The order of things. Аn archaeology of the human sciences. SPb., 1994.
17. Foucault M. This is not a pipe. М., 1999.
18. Eco U. The open work. SPb., 2004.
19. Jacobson R. Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances // The theory of metaphore. М., 1990.
20. Yampolskiy M. The weaver and the visionary. М., 2007.
About this article
Author: Kondratyev E.A.
Year: 2011
|