Vestnik On-line
Orenburg State University december 30, 2025   RU/EN
false
Headings of Vestnik
Pedagogics
Psychology
Other

Search
Vak
Антиплагиат
Orcid
Viniti
ЭБС Лань
Rsl
Лицензия Creative Commons

November 2025, № 4 (248), pages 124-130

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-248-124

Nevolina V.V., Ryndak V.G., Bakaev А.А. THE INTEGRATIVE ROLE OF MENTORING IN THE PROCESS OF INVOLVING STUDENTS IN RESEARCH ACTIVITIESIn the context of the transformation of the higher education system, focused on the formation of a competitive and independent specialist, the involvement of students in research activities is becoming a key task of higher education. However, this process is fraught with a number of systemic difficulties, such as fragmented knowledge, difficulties in self-formulation of scientific problems and their methodological support, as well as a crisis of professional identity at the initial stages of the scientific path. This article examines the integrative role of mentoring as an integral pedagogical phenomenon that can overcome these barriers and ensure a holistic and systematic student involvement in the research process. Based on the theoretical analysis, it is considered how mentoring performs integrative functions at various levels: epistemological, methodological, socio-psychological, and personal-semantic. At the epistemological level, the mentor acts as a guide, integrating disparate disciplinary knowledge into a single scientific picture of the world and helping the student identify relevant research problems. At the methodological level, the focus is shifting to the integration of theoretical knowledge with practical skills in designing and conducting research, and the formation of research competence. The socio-psychological aspect is revealed through the integration of the student into the scientific community, the assimilation of its norms, values and language. The personal-semantic level implies the integration of research activities into the system of personal values and professional orientations of the student, the formation of his identity as a future scientist or specialist. The work uses the concepts and theoretical constructions of leading Russian scientists in the field of pedagogy and psychology of higher education, such as A.A. Verbitsky, V.I. Zagvyazinsky, E.A. Shashenkova., M.I. Rozhkov, N.F. Talyzina and others. It is concluded that mentoring, being built as a dialogical, subject-to-subject process, is a central integrative mechanism that ensures the depth, sustainability and meaningfulness of students’ involvement in research activities, thereby contributing to solving strategic tasks of training scientific personnel in the Russian Federation. Key words: mentoring, students’ research activities, motivation, scientific communication, pedagogical research.

Download
References:

1. Bakaev, A. (2024) Formation model of future engineer research culture in student design bureau. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, No. 3(243), pp. 87–92 (In Russ). — DOI 10.25198/1814-6457-243-87

2. Balakhovskiy A. and Timoshev R. (2012) Methodological culture of the subject of scientific activity: theory and practice of formation. Scientific and Informational Journal Army and Society, No. 1(29), pp. 23–31. (In Russ.).

3. Verbitsky A. (2006) Contextual learning in the competence-based approach. Higher education in Russia, No. 11, pp. 39–46. (In Russ.).

4. Vygotsky L. (1991) The dynamics of mental development of a schoolchild in connection with learning. Pedagogical Psychology. Moscow: Pedagogika, pp. 391–410. (In Russ.).

5. Galperin P. (1959) The development of research on the formation of mental actions. Psychological science in the USSR, Vol. 1. Moscow: APN RSFSR, pp. 441–469. (In Russ.).

6. Ganaeva E., Maslovskaya S. and Muratova A. (2020) Mentoring as a resource for teacher’s professional development. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, No. 5(228), pp. 91–98. (In Russ.). DOI 10.25198/1814-6457-228-91.

7. Ganaeva E. and Tavstukha O. (2024) Implementation of the mentoring model in formal and non-formal education. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, No. 4(244), pp. 15–21. (In Russ.). DOI 10.25198/1814-6457-244-15.

8. Gilmeeva R. (2023) Features of the development of scientific mentoring and scientific school. Bulletin of Kazan State University of Culture and Arts, No. 4, pp. 114–119. (In Russ.).

9. Zagvyazinskiy V. (2015) On the connection between methodology and technology in pedagogical research. Education and science, No. 5(124), pp. 4–14. (In Russ.). DOI 10.17853/1994-5639-2015-5-4-15.

10. Kolobova L., Ksenofontova A. and Moroz V. (2024). On digitalization in the educational process. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, No. 4(244), pp. 44–51. (In Russ.). DOI 10.25198/1814-6457-244-44.

11. Kosheleva Yu. (2014) The role of the “significant other” in the dynamics of significant relationships among young people. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University, No. 7(683), pp. 70–81. (In Russ.).

12. Miroshnikov S. (2021) Orenburg State University in the context of transformation. Higher education in Russia, Vol. 30, No. 8-9, pp. 105–114. (In Russ.). DOI 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-8-9-105-114.

13. Naletov Yu. (2018) The problem of the unity of natural science knowledge and the concept of “epistemological break”. Bulletin of Vyatka State University, No. 4, pp. 46–53. (In Russ.). DOI 10.25730/VSU.7606.18.036.

14. Nevolina V. (2018) Pedagogical support of a student at a university: theory and technologies. European Journal of Social Sciences, No. 7-2, pp. 329–333. (In Russ.).

15. Rozhkov M. (2005) Existential approach to the organization of the educational process. Proceedings of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, No. 1(10), pp. 35–38. (In Russ.).

16. Rudnitskaya-Volkova V. (2023). On the problem of the essence of the self-concept. Proceedings of the I Youth Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the Day of Russian Science at Sevastopol State University, Sevastopol, February 08, 2023. Sevastopol: Sevastopol State University, pp. 263–264. (In Russ.).

17. Saytbagina L. (2016) Formation of the “I am a researcher” concept in the conditions of problem-concentrated learning of university students. In: Vocational Education and Youth Employment: the 21st Century. The Problem of Advanced Training for the Russian Economy (Regional Aspect): Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Kemerovo, March 17, 2016. Vol. Part 2. Kemerovo: Kuzbass Regional Institute for the Development of Vocational Education, pp. 91–93. (In Russ.).

18. Slobodchikov V. (2010) Event-based educational community — a source of development and a subject of education. New educational values, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 4–13. (In Russ.).

19. Talyzina N. (1984) Managing the Process of Knowledge Acquisition. Moscow: MGU. (In Russ.).

20. Schon D. (1994) Teaching artistry through reflection-in-action. In: Tsoukas H. (ed.) New Thinking in Organizational Behaviour. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 235–249.


About this article

Authors: Nevolina V.V., Ryndak V.G., Bakaev A.A.

Year: 2025

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-248-124

Editor-in-chief
Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

Crossref
Cyberleninka
Doi
Europeanlibrary
Googleacademy
scienceindex
worldcat
© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru
1999–2025 © CIT OSU