november 22, 2024

RU/EN

Headings of Vestnik

June 2022, № 3 (235), pages 87-93

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-233-87

Panov A.A., Frolov O.V. PEDAGOGY OF THE COMMUNICATIVE CULTURE OF THE FUTURE PROSECUTORS WORKERThe result of bibliographic and field research was the confirmation of the hypothesis that the effectiveness of the professional activity of the future prosecutor’s worker is determined by active and competent participation in the anthropic process of comprehending the specifics of professional communications already at the stage of obtaining professional education. The authors consistently present and meaningfully reveal the categories of “education”, “culture”, “communicative culture”, “communication”. The upbringing of a communicative culture in the cultural space of a law school will ensure in the future a positive impact on the subject and interaction between subjects in professional activities within the framework of the law as a true value of social order and the triumph of justice. The scientific novelty of the work lies in identifying the axiological level of the communicative culture of the future prosecutor’s worker, the most important task of which is the approval of communicative values that authorize the program of interaction in prosecutorial activities; fixation of pedagogical norms, commensurate with the humanitarian nature of the modern personality, “returned” to communication “after hitches, breaks, indistinctness” (Schegloff) interaction. Pedagogical intentions in the communicative culture of future prosecutors are determined. The phenomenon of education of communicative culture in axiological and culturological approaches has been studied. The upbringing of the communicative culture of the future prosecutor, creating conceptual systems of professional communication and supporting dialogue relations, will help to strengthen the semantic continuum of the space of professional activity, including the means of activity and the organization of consciousness that develops in communication (vision, understanding, meaning formation) (V.M. Rozin). The results of the study can be used in the education of future prosecutors in the communicative space of a law school and in the formation of a system of educational work in the prosecutor’s office of the Russian Federation.Key words: education, culture, communicative culture, pedagogy, prosecutorial activity, interaction.

Download

References:

1.Belyj A. Simvolizm kak miroponimanie [Symbolism as a world outlook]. M.: Respublika, 1994. 528 s.

2.Grachev V.I. Phenomenology of socio-cultural communication as a special substance of culture. Kul’tura kul’tury [Culture of Culture]. 2021. №3. S.21-24.

3.Grachev V.I. Cognitive-epistemological platform of the communicative-axiogenic paradigm of modern culture. Kul’tura kul’tury [Culture of Culture]. 2022. №1. S.36-38.

4.Drach G.V. Constitutives of cultural theory. Kul’turologicheskij zhurnal [Culturological journal]. 2011. №3(5). S. 27-29.

5.Erekesheva L.G. The concept of culture in theoretical sociology: the problem of definition. Kul’turologicheskij zhurnal [Culturological journal]. 2016. №1(23). S.3-6.

6.Zenkin S.View of the world / a word about the world. Logos. 2021. №5. S.91-97.

7.Koul M. Kul’turno-istoricheskaja psihologija: nauka budushhego [Cultural-historical psychology: the science of the future]. Moskva: “Kogito-Centr”, Izdatel›stvo “Institut psihologii RAN”. 1997. C. 154.

8.Luman N. What is communication? Sociologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological journal]. 1995. №3. S. 114-124.

9.Markarjan Je.S. Teorija kultury i sovremennaja nauka [The theory of culture and modern science]. M.: Mysl›. 1983. S. 13–14.

10.Mihajlichenko D.G. Phenomenology of psychological repressiveness. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chuvash University]. 2010. №4. S. 126-129.

11.Momdzhjan K.H. On the question of constructing social reality. Filosofskij zhurnal [Philosophy Journal]. 2021. T. 14. №4. S. 38–52.

12.Moskovichi S. Mashina, tvorjashhaja bogov [Machine that creates gods]. M.: Centr psihologii i psihoterapii. 1998. S. 21.

13.Neklessa A.I. Formation of a Post-Social Network Society: New Civilizational Challenges. Mirovoj obshhestvennyj forum “Dialog civilizacij” [World Public Forum “Dialogue of Civilizations”], X Jubilejnaja sessija, 3-8 oktjabrja 2012 g., o. Rodos, Grecija.

14.Ovchinnikov A.I., Ovchinnikova S.P. Evrazijskoe pravovoe myshlenie N.N. Alekseeva [N.N. Alekseev Eurasian legal thinking]. Rostov n/D: SKNC VSh. 2002. 146 s.

15.Prikaz Genprokuratury Rossii ot 13.04.2018 N 224.

16.Federalnyj zakon “O prokurature Rossijskoj Federacii” ot 17.01.1992 g. №2202-1.

17.Flier A.Ja.Culture as a socio-regulatory system and its historical typology. Kul’tura kul’tury [Culture of Culture]. 2014. №2. S.4-6.

18.Flier A.Ja. Izbrannye raboty po teorii kul’tury [Selected works on the theory of culture]. M.: Soglasie. 2014. 560 s.

19.Hajdegger M. Vremja i bytie [Time and being]. M.: Izd-vo “Ad Marginem.”1997. S.392.

20. Vakhtin N. The Discourse of Argumentation in Totalitarian Language and Post-Soviet Communication Failures. Vakhtin N., Firsov B. (Eds.). P. 16.

21. Kakutani M. Limping democracy and the diligence of a woodpecker. New York: Tim Duggan Books, 2018. — 208 p.

22.Luhmann Niklas. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (1.3 Evolution). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997 (Luman N. Obshhestvo obshhestva. Ch. III. Jevoljucija. M.: Logos, 2005).

About this article

Authors: Panov A.A., Frolov O.V.

Year: 2022

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-233-87

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru