|
|
|
June 2022, № 3 (235), pages 14-19doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-233-14
Drobotenko Yu.B. UNIVERSITY TEACHER’S RESEARCH STRATEGIES FOR HYBRID LEARNING REALIZATIONThe article identifies the problem of developing University teachers’ skills of how to apply research strategies to study the conditions in which hybrid learning at the university would be successful. It is shown that the spread of hybrid methodology in higher education has led to the complication in educational process realization and required teachers to search for appropriate teaching tools and methods serving to handle the new challenges. The issue of hybrid learning organization at the university is one of the most widely discussed and urgent in modern education. The spread of hybrid methodology in higher education has led to the complication in educational process realization and required teachers to search for appropriate teaching tools and methods serving to handle the new challenges. Moreover, it required teachers to develop their educational design skills, skills of evaluation and research skills to study hybrid educational practice. The purpose of the paper is to explain the foundation and describe the research strategies that University teachers need to successfully organize and implement hybrid learning. In accordance with the key focus of University teachers’ activity (solving professional issues), there are four types of research strategies: a strategy aimed at researching the external environment and the surrounding society; a strategy aimed at researching the subject of education; a strategy aimed at researching the activities of the subject of education; a strategy aimed at researching the teacher personality and their activities. Hybrid learning organization calls for a teacher’s ability to use research strategies and analysis techniques as a key element in finding the answers to the questions about what is happening, why it is happening, what could happen, what should be done. The article was prepared within the fundamental research of State Assignment implementation on the topic “Professional competence of a teacher for the implementation of hybrid learning” (Supplementary Agreement of the Ministry of Education of Russia and the Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education “OMSPU” No. 073-03-2022-035/3 от 08.06.2022).Key words: hybrid learning, hybrid educational environment, digital technologies, University teachers, teacher’s research strategies for hybrid learning realization.
References:
1. Andreeva N.V. Pedagogy of effective blended learning. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psihologiya [Modern foreign psychology], 2020, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 8-20.
2. Asadullina L.I., Duseev I.R. University teacher competencies in blended learning. Molodoj uchenyj [Young scientist], 2015, no. 10 (90), pp. 1086-1088.
3. Afanas’eva O.YU., Smirnova M.V., Fedotova M.G., Radyuk YU.G. Hybrid educational environment in teacher training. Vestnik YUzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universitet [Bulletin of the South Ural State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University], 2020, no. 6 (159), pp. 7-18.
4. Gibridnoe obrazovanie i obuchenie — budushchee, k kotoromu nado prijti [Hybrid education and training is the future to be reached]. Available at: https://www.hse.ru/news/edu/585452210.html (Accessed: 22.03.2022).
5. Scientific eds. Suhanova E.A., Frumin I.D. Kachestvo obrazovaniya v rossijskih universitetah: chto my ponyali v pandemiyu: Analiticheskij doklad [The quality of education in Russian universities: what we understood during the pandemic: Analytical report]. Tomsk: Izdatel’stvo Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2021, 46 p.
6. Kozyrev V.A. and Radionova N.F. (eds.) Kompetentnostnyj podhod v pedagogicheskom obrazovanii: kollektiv. monografiya [Competence-based approach in teacher education: team. monograph]. M-vo obrazovaniya i nauki Ros. Federacii, Nac. fond podgot. kadrov, Ros. gos. ped. un-t im. A.I. Gercena. SPb.: Izd-vo RGPU im. A.I. Gercena, 2004, 391 p.
7. Kocharova T. Kak analitika uluchshaet onlajn-obrazovanie [How analytics improves online education]. Available at: https://theoryandpractice.ru/posts/19128-kak-analitika-uluchshaet-onlayn-obrazovanie (Acessed: 22.03.2022).
8. Senashenko V.S., Makarova A.A. va A.A. Educational hybrids in higher education in Russia. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia], 2018, no. 8-9, pp. 24-42.
9. Horn M., Stejker H. Smeshannoe obuchenie. Ispol’zovanie proryvnyh innovacij dlya uluchsheniya shkol’nogo obrazovaniya [Blended learning. Using breakthrough innovations to improve school education]. San-Francisko: Jossey-Bass, 2015, 343 p. Available at: http://imc-yal72.ru/images/1_4.pdf
10. CHernyshenko O.V., Nosacheva E.A. Digital footprint as a means of improving the quality of the educational process. Mir universitetskoj nauki: kul’tura, obrazovanie [World of university science: culture, education], 2022, no. 2, pp. 15-18. DOI 10.18522/2658-6983-2022-2-15-18
11. Ellis, R. A., Pardo, A., & Han, F. (2016). Quality in blended learning environments — significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations. Computers & Education, 102, 90-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.006
About this article
Author: Drobotenko Yu.B.
Year: 2022
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-233-14
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|