|
|
|
June 2026, № 2 (250), pages 26-38doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-250-26
Kiryakova A.V., Ivanova V.M., Kainyshev M.S. PRINCIPLES OF PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTERFACES: REFLECTION AND DISTRIBUTED RESPONSIBILITYArtificial intelligence (AI) interface design is used in education. The dominant linear "request-response" model, focused on operational efficiency, reduces reflection and delegates responsibility to the algorithm, which creates the risk of learner value disorientation. The aim of this study is to develop principles for the pedagogical design of AI interfaces and an architecture of distributed responsibility that ensures a reflective mode of interaction. The methodological basis is a synthesis of the philosophy of technology, cultural-historical theory, and an axiological approach. Our study proposes four principles of reflective design: reflexive organization of interaction, value problematization, preservation of subject responsibility, and transparency of technological limitations. The concept of a three-level architecture of distributed responsibility (technical level – teacher – learner) based on the Human-in-the-Loop model is defined as an "architecture of inalienable responsibility." A pedagogical scenario for the system's operation was examined using an educational essay as an example, along with a system of diagnostic metrics: diagnostic value, provocation diversity, reflectivity coefficient, semantic structure, and value representation index. The model is fundamentally feasible based on existing language models. The conceptual and methodological nature of the study opens up prospects for empirical verification and the development of prototypes of reflective AI interfaces.Key words: artificial intelligence in education, pedagogical design of interfaces, reflexive mediator, distributed responsibility, Human-in-the-Loop model, value problematisation, axiological approach, educational support, subjectivity, diagnostic metrics.
References:
1. Bryzgalina E. V. (2021) Iskusstvennyy intellekt v obrazovanii. Analiz tseley vnedreniya [Artificial Intelligence in Education. Analysis of Implementation Goals]. Chelovek, Vol. 32, No. 2, Pp. 9–29. URL: https://chelovekras.ru/s023620070014856-8-1/?version_id=81750 (accessed: 14.04.2026). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070014856-8
2. Tereshchenko, A.Yu. and Morozov A.V. (2024) Vliyanie tekhnologiy iskusstvennogo intellekta na sovremennoe obrazovanie [The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Technologies on Modern Education]. Chelovecheskiy kapital, No. 4 (184), Pp. 104–110. URL: https://humancapital.su/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/202404_p104-110.pdf (accessed: 14.04.2026). DOI: 10.25629/HC.2024.04.11
3. Galaguzova M. A., Galaguzova Yu. N. and Shtinova G. N. (2024) Iskusstvennyy intellekt v pedagogike: ot ponyatiya k funktsii [Artificial Intelligence in Pedagogy: From Concept to Function]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii, No. 2, Pp. 48–55. URL: https://pedobrazovanie.ru/archive/2024/2/iskusstvennyj-intellekt-v-pedagogike-ot-ponyatiya-k-funktsii (accessed: 14.04.2026). EDN: JBMYDO
4. Kiryakova A.V. (1996) Teoriya orientatsii lichnosti v mire tsennostey [Theory of Personality Orientation in the World of Values]. Orenburg: Yuzhnyy Ural, 188 p.
5. Ivanova V.M. and Kaynyshev M.S. (2023) Obrazovatel›naya podderzhka tsennostno-smyslovoy samoaktualizatsii studentov v uchebnoy deyatel'nosti [Educational Support for Students’ Value-Meaning Self-Actualization in Learning Activities]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, No. 4. URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=32787 (accessed: 14.04.2026). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.32787
6. Siregar S. (2025) Phenomenological Exploration of Teachers’ and Students’ Experiences with Digital Learning Platforms. Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, Vol. 1, No. 4, Pp. 146–154. URL: https://journals.ai-mrc.com/jeir/article/view/247/326 (accessed: 14.04.2026).
7. Merleau-Ponty M. (1991) Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya (1945) [Phenomenology of Perception (1945)]. Istoriko-filosofskiy ezhegodnik, Vol. 5, Pp. 267–270. URL: https://ife.iphras.ru/article/view/9779?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed: 14.04.2026).
8. Weber M. (1990) “Ob'ektivnost’” sotsial’no-nauchnogo i sotsial’no-politicheskogo poznaniya [“Objectivity” of Social Science and Social Policy Knowledge]. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: Transl. from German. Comp., ed. and afterword by Yu. N. Davydov. Moscow: Progress, Pp. 345–415. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obektivnost-sotsialno-nauchnogo-i-sotsialno-politicheskogo-poznaniya (accessed: 14.04.2026).
9. Vygotsky L. S. (2025) Istoriya razvitiya vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsiy [The History of the Development of Higher Mental Functions]. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing House, 336 p. (Anthology of Thought). ISBN 978-5-534-07532-8. Electronic text // Educational platform Yurayt [website]. URL: https://urait.ru/bcode/562587 (accessed: 14.04.2026).
10. Heidegger M. (1993) Vremya i bytie: Stat›i i vystupleniya [Time and Being: Articles and Speeches]: Transl. from German. Moscow: Respublika, 447 p.
11. Glukhovsky A.S., Durnev A.D. and Chirva D.V. (2024) Raspredelennaya moral›naya otvetstvennost› v sfere iskusstvennogo intellekta [Distributed Moral Responsibility in the Field of Artificial Intelligence]. Eticheskaya mysl', Vol. 24, No. 1, Pp. 129–143. URL: https://et.iphras.ru/issue/view/512 (accessed: 14.04.2026). DOI: 10.21146/2074-4870-2024-24-1-129-143
12. Floridi L. (2016) Faultless responsibility: On the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 374. Is. 2083. Art. 20160112. URL: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2016.0112 (accessed: 14.04.2026). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0112
13. Ocheretyany K. (2024) Markiz de Sad – izobretatel’ interfeysa [Marquis de Sade – Inventor of the Interface]. Logos, Vol. 34, No. 6 (163), Pp. 47–66. URL: https://logosjournal.ru/archive/2024/logos_34_6_2024.pdf (accessed: 14.04.2026). DOI: 10.17323/0869-5377-2024-6-47-64
14. Chirva D. (2024) Chelovecheskoe v chelovekomashinnom gibride iskusstvennogo intellekta [The Human in the Human–Machine Hybrid of Artificial Intelligence]. Logos, Vol. 34, No. 6 (163), Pp. 203-214. URL: https://logosjournal.ru/archive/2024/logos_34_6_2024.pdf (accessed: 14.04.2026). DOI: 10.17323/0869-5377-2024-6-203-214
15. Lenkevich A. and Latypova A. (2024) Interfeys kak zhalo v plot’: Igrovye kontrollery i radikal’nyy inzhiniring tela [Interface as a Sting in the Flesh: Game Controllers and Radical Body Engineering]. Logos, Vol. 34, No. 6 (163), Pp. 157–176. URL: https://logosjournal.ru/archive/2024/logos_34_6_2024.pdf (accessed: 14.04.2026). DOI: 10.17323/0869-5377-2024-6-157-176
16. Petruneva R.M., Efimov E.G., Avdeyuk O.A. and Chudasova T.D. (2024) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opinions of Students and Teachers (Case Study of Volgograd State Technical University). Vestnik of Orenburg State University, 2024. – № 2 (58). – P. 19-31. – 13 p.
https://doi.org/10.35211/2500-2635-2024-2-58-19-31
17. Pak L.G. and Shishkovskaya I.P. (2025) Patterns of the Axiological Concept of Socialization of the Digital Generation of University Students in the Context of Countering the Riskogenicity of Modern Society. Vestnik of Orenburg State University, № 4 (248), Pp. 131–138. 7 p. DOI: 10.25198/1814-6457-248-131
18. Sikorskaya G.A. (2025) Effectiveness of Introducing Elements of Independent Compilation of a Mathematical Test into the Educational Process of a University Student. Vestnik of Orenburg State University, № 4 (248), Pp. 146-155. 10 p. DOI: 10.25198/1814-6457-248-146
19. Ksenofontova A.N. and Ledeneva A.V. (2020) Digitalization of Education: Problems and Prospects. Vestnik of Orenburg State University, № 5 (228), Pp. 86-90. DOI: 10.25198/1814-6457-228-86
20. Kolobova L.V., Ksenofontova A.N. and Moroz V.V. ( 2024) On Digitalization in the Educational Process. Vestnik of Orenburg State University, № 4 (244), Pp. 44–51. 8 p. doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-244-44
21. Matrosova Yu.S. (2025) Pedagogical Empathy in Teacher-Student Interaction in the Study of Pedagogical Disciplines. Vestnik of Orenburg State University, № 3 (247), Pp. 112–117. doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-247-112
22. Ledeneva A.V., Askhadullina N.N. and Safargaliev E.R. (2025) Transformation of the Pedagogical Process in the Context of Digitalization of Education. Vestnik of Orenburg State University, № 2 (246), Pp. 43-50. 8 p. DOI: 10.25198/1814-6457-246-43
23. Nuriev N.K. and Starygina S.D. (2026) Parametric Didactics of Cyber-Physical Systems: A Methodological Model for Managing the Development of Student’s Intellectual Resources. Vestnik of Orenburg State University, № 1 (249), Pp. 79–88. 10 p. DOI: 10.25198/1814-6457-249-79
24. Safronovich I.E. (2026) Modern Approaches to Student Assessment in Higher and Secondary Vocational Education. Vestnik of Orenburg State University, № 1 (249), Pp. 99-107. 9 p. DOI: 10.25198/1814-6457-249-99
25. Chukhin S.G. and Chukhina E.V. (2025) Traditional Values as a Factor in the Formation of Russian Civic Identity among Schoolchildren in Modern Socio-Cultural Conditions. Vestnik of Orenburg State University, № 4 (248), Pp. 24–32. 9 p. DOI: 10.25198/1814-6457-248-24
26. Pak L.G., Ivanishcheva N.A., Ryabtsov S.N. and Kochemasova L.A. (2023) Andragogical Concept of Supporting Teachers in the Context of Digital Transformation of Education: Leading Ideas, Principles and Patterns. Vestnik of Orenburg State University, № 4 (240), Pp. 65–73. 9 p. DOI: 10.25198/1814-6457-240-65
About this article
Authors: Kiryakova A.V., Ivanova V.M., Kaynyshev M.S.
Year: 2026
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-250-26
|
|
 Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|