Vestnik On-line
Orenburg State University february 25, 2021   RU/EN
Headings of Vestnik

ЭБС Лань
Лицензия Creative Commons

August 2020, № 4 (227), pages 6-10

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-227-6

Bakieva D.A. THE DEVELOPMENT SPECIFICS OF OPEN SOCIO-CULTURAL SPACE IN PEDAGOGICAL ACTIVITYThe article attempts to formulate the substantiation of the phenomenon of open sociocultural space, traditionally interpreted as endless, both chaotic and structured, continuous interaction of communication systems. A communication system is understood as any subject of communication, be it a person, an educational institution, an Internet resource, etc. Their connections, interweaving of connections, diversity give rise to an open socio-cultural space. In other words, an open sociocultural space is a set of communications of various levels of complexity and different types. The integrated communication model is aimed at the development of an open sociocultural space. The key task of the integrated communication model is to build in an open socio-cultural space “nodal points of communication” with different subjects of communication on the basis of some socially and personally significant issue or problem. In this case, the open socio-cultural space appears not as an endless field of potential opportunities, but as a “marked” field of an individual's activity, which makes it possible to translate opportunities into a specific activity and a specific result. The organization of educational activities, however, is possible only if a number of pedagogical conditions for the development of an open socio-cultural space are observed. Also, the development of an open socio-cultural space by a person is regulated by basic principles that make it possible to update it in accordance with the educational request. The personality in this case is the “customer” of the educational product, and the educational process most fully provides the task of transforming an individual into a personality. Thus, an open socio-cultural space must be positioned as a diverse educational resource that transforms depending on the educational task.Key words: Open sociocultural space, model of integrated communication, communication, subject-subject relations, personality, pedagogical activity.


1. Vaniushkina L.M. Vneauditornoe obrazovanie — put’ v novoe obrazovatel’noe prostranstvo [Extracurricular education is a path to a new educational space]. Monografiia [Monograph]. Saint-Petersburg, 2003, p. 15. (In Russ.)

2. Vistorobskaia V.D. On the issue of educational communication in pedagogical interaction of participants in the educational process. Molodoi uchenyi [Young scientist], 2017, № 15 (149), pp. 556-560. (In Russ.)

3. Dautova O.B., Krylova O.N. Development of neoclassical didactics as a response to the challenges of the time. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie [Continuing education], 2018, № 1(23), pp. 4-8. (In Russ.)

4. Griakalov A.A. Philosophy and transpedagogy of childhood. Seriia “Symposium”, Innovatsiiiobrazovanie, Vypusk 29, Sbornik materialov konferentsii Sankt-Peterburg [Innovation and Education, (Collection of conference materials Sankt-Peterburg)] Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo publ., 2003, pp. 53-62. (In Russ.)

5. Korobkova E.N. Another look at open education: sociocultural context. Pedagogika iskusstva [Pedagogy of art], 2019, no. 2, pp. 21-28. (In Russ.)

6. Molostova N. Iu. Modern education as a system for the formation of innovative behavior. Izvestiia Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN [Bulletin of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.], 2011, №2-4, pp. 866-869. (In Russ.)

7. Popov A. A. Otkrytoe obrazovanie: filosofiia i tekhnologii [Open education: philosophy and technology] №32. Vol. 3. URSS Publ., 2016, p. 51.(In Russ.)

8. Plotnikov V. I. Spirit and its cultural and historical modifications. Dukhovnost’ ikul’tura. Dukhovnost’ mirootnosheniia :materialyvseros. konf. [Spirituality and culture. Spirituality of the World Relationship: All-Russian Materials. conf.]. Ekaterinburg, 1994, pp. 4-29. (In Russ.)

9. Smirnov A.V. Vsechelovecheskoe vs obshchechelovecheskoe [Panhuman vs crosshuman], Moscow, “Sadra” Publ., 2019,p. 207.(In Russ.)

10. Surtaeva N.N., Milovanova N.G., Ivanova O.A. Sotsiokul’turnaia I sotsial’nopedagogicheskaia deiatel’nost’ v osnove sotsiokul’turnogo podkhoda [Sociocultural and social pedagogical activity at the heart of the sociocultural approach], MNKO, 2019, №4 (77), pp. 73-75. (In Russ.)

11. Tarasov S.V. Educational environment: concept, structure, typology. Vestnik LGU im. A.S. Pushkina [Bulletin of Leningrad State University im. A.S. Pushkin], 2011, №3, pp.24-30. (In Russ.)

12. Tikhonova R.I. Scientific and methodological foundations of the study of historical linguistic disciplines at the university. Doctor’s thesis. Ufa, 2002, 45 p. (In Russ.)

13. Trubina G.F., Zeer E.F., Mashchenko M.V. A socially oriented approach in education as a condition for the successful socialization of a student. Obrazovanie I nauka [Education and Science], 2017, №6, pp. 9-32. (In Russ.)

14. Frumin I.D. Tainyshkoly [School secrets], Krasnoiarsk, KGU Publ.,1999, p. 143. (In Russ.)

15. Shakirova E.Iu. Sociocultural Space: Foundations of Ontological Analysis. Vestnik SamGU [Samara State University Bulletin], 2014, №1 (112), pp. 15-18. (In Russ.)

About this article

Author: Bakieva D.A.

Year: 2020

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-227-6

Sergey Aleksandrovich

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail:
1999–2021 © CIT OSU