|
|
|
Glukhovskaya M.Y. ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY AND REGIONAL TERRITORY STABILITY ON THE EXAMPLE OF ORENBURG REGIONAbstract. Justification of ecosystem sustainability and its ecological stability is one of the urgent problems of our time the solution of which will allow us to develop methods of environmentally safe and harmonious development of the region. Definition of ecosystem sustainability is based on the ratio of territories under the elements of favorable and negative impacts. The heterogeneity of the influence and the ecological significance of each biotechnical element are taken into account in the determining of the stability. The assessment of these parameters is based on the landscape elements identification and their subdivision into predetermined categories in accordance with the structural distribution of the land fund. The main categories include forest, agricultural, settlements, industrial, natural conservation, stock and water lands. Their share on the territory of Orenburg region is 88.5, 5.2, 3.2, 2.1, 0.6, 0.25, 0.15 % respectively. Agricultural land is divided into arable land (55.9 %), fodder land (43.5 %), perennial plantations (0.6 %). Analysis of land distribution allowed us to define time area changes of separate categories and the degree of influence on environment sustainability and territory stability. The maximum stability value is 0.79 when the optimum is at least 1. The stability coefficient is 0.36 and it is 29.5 % below the minimum rate. A number of discrepancies has been identified in the relation to maximum ecological parameters: a large area of agricultural lands (88.5 % with the rate for the steppe zone 60–65 % and optimum 40 %), a high level of plowing (more than 50 % at the rate 40–45 %), extremely low part of the forest fund (5.16 % at the rate 10–15 % and the optimum 15–20 %) and a shortage of natural systems in area land composition in general (SPNT 0.19–0.64 %). The obtained results indicate the violation of ecological system sustainability limit and low level territory stability. The solution of the problem is the introduction of environmental zoning system that makes possible to differentiate the approach to load reduction on the Orenburg region land fund.Key words: land fund, land fund structure, ecological sustainability, ecological stability, maximum permissible environmental loads.
References:
1. Ajdarov, I.P. Obustrojstvo agrolandshaftov Rossii / I.P. Ajdarov. — M.:MGUP, 2007. — 312 s.
2. Blohin, E.V. EHkologi pochv Orenburgskoj oblasti: pochvennye resursy, monitoring, agroehkologicheskoe rajonirovanie / E.V. Blohin. — Ekaterinburg:UrORAN, 1997. — 228 s.
3. Gluhovskaya, M.YU., Analiz ustojchivosti regional'nyh territorij (na primere otdel'nogo rajona orenburgskoj oblasti) / M.YU. Gluhovskaya, T.A. Evstifeeva // Materialy vserossijskoj nauchno-metodicheskoj konferencii, 2016. — S. 779–785.
4. Isachenko, A.G. EHkologicheskaya geografiya Rossii / A.G. Isachenko. — SPb:Izdat.dom SPbGU, 2001. — 328 s.
5. Karev, V.B. Rol' prirodoobustrojstva sel'skih poselenij territorii v obespechenii ustojchivogo razvitiya APK / V.B. Karev, N.T. Kaveshnikov // Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, 2007. — 5 s.
6. Chibilev, A.A. Geograficheskij atlas Orenburgskoj oblasti / A.A. Chibilev. — Orenburg:Orenburgskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1999. — 95 s.
7. Bucek, A. Ecological stability and ecological stress in environmental geography | [Ekologicka stabilita a ekologicky stres v geografii zivotniho prostredi] / A. Bucek // Sbornik Praci. — 1988. — CSAV 18. — Р. 69–75.
8. Bucek, A. Complete land reformations in the territory of the productional-organisational unit Merin and agricultural utilization of the landscape. [Souhrnne pozemkove upravy na uzemi vyrobne organizacni jednotky Merin a zemedelske vyuzitikrajiny.] / A. Bucek, , J. Ungerman // Zpravy Geografickeho. — 1978. — Ustavu Csav 15(6-7). — Р. 93–104.
9. Buček, A. Supraregional territorial system of landscape-ecological stability of the former Czechoslovakia / A. Buček, J. Lacina // Ekologia Bratislava. — 1996. — 15(1). — Р. 71–76.
10. Masný, M. Multi-temporal analysis of an agricultural landscape transformation and abandonment (Lubietová, Central Slovakia) / M. Masný, L. Zaušková // Open Geosciences. — 2015. — 7(1). — Р. 888–896.
11. Moyzeova, M. Territorial systems of ecological stability in land consolidation projects (example of proposal for the lses of klasov village, slovak republic) / M. Moyzeova, P. Kenderessy // Ekologia Bratislava. — 2015. — 34(4). — Р. 356–370.
11. Jurko, А. Übersicht über die pflanzengesellschaften des cynosurion-verbandes in den karpaten / А. Jurko // Vegetatio. — 1969. — Vol. 18, iss. 1. — Р. 222–239.
12. Jurko, A. Pflanzengesellschaften an schattigen felse en westkarpaten / A. Jurko, V. Peciar // Vegetatio Acta Geobotanica. — 1963. — Vol. 11, iss. 4. — Р. 199–209.
13. Voloscuk, I. Ecological stability in the Tatra mountains forests / I. Voloscuk // Ekologia Bratislava. — 1998. — 17(1). — Р. 39–48.
14. Zaušková, L. Landscape-ecological interpretation and applications of landscape survey results for optimal land use / L. Zaušková // Ekologia Bratislava. — 2014. — 33(3). — Р. 252–258.
15. Supuka, J. Share of scattered woody vegetation in landscape ecological stability and agriculture sustainability / J. Supuka, P. Uhrin // Folia Oecologica. — 2016. — 43(2). — Р. 193–203.
About this article
Author: Gluhovskaya M.Yu.
Year: 2017
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|