Mukhamadeev R.A., Trubina O.M., Petrosyan E.A. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SENSITIVITY TO REDThe peculiarities of perception of the stimulus of red in the visual field when using natural and artificially imposed (conservative and free) criteria decision chromaticity of the stimulus. We investigated the relationship of severity of cognitive style "field-dependence/field-independence" the size of the color visual field. It is shown that field-independence individuals differ wider color field of view with any criteria for the detection of the stimulus. For field-independence and field-dependence individuals characterized by the narrowing of the color visual field when using a conservative criterion and extension of the color visual field when using the free criterion. Field-independence individuals narrowing of the visual field on a conservative criterion exceeds the extension of the visual field when using the free criterion across all test meridians.Key words: color visual field, the criterion of detection signal, field-independence, field-dependence.
References:
1. Gusev, A.N. Psychophysics of sensory tasks: Systemic activity analysis of human behavior in situations of uncertainty [Text] / A.N. Gusev. — M.: Publishing house of Moscow state University, 2004. — 316 p.
2. Kimble, J. The detection threshold signals and decision making [Text] / G. Kimble, N. Garmezy // Psychology sensation and perception. Readings in psychology. — M., 1999. — P. 261–270.
3. Kornilova, T.V. Approaches to the study of cognitive styles: twenty years later [Text] / T.V. Kornilova, G.V. Paramei // Questions of psychology. — 1989. — №6. — P. 140–147.
4. Kravkov, S.V. Color vision [Text] / S.V. Kravkov. — M.: Publishing AS USSR, 1951. — 176 p.
5. Libin, A.V. Differential psychology: at the crossroads of European, Russian and American traditions [Text] / A.V. Libin. — M.: Eksmo, 2006. — 544 p.
6. Mitkokh, D.I. Methods and devices for research of the visual field [Text] / D.I. Mitkokh, D.D. Noskova. — M.: Medicine, 1975. — 123 p.
7. Rebrova, O.Yu. Statistical analysis of medical data. The use of the software package STATISTICA [Text] / O.Yu Rebrova. — M: Media Sphere, 2002. — 312 p.
8. Kholodnaya, M.A. Cognitive styles. On the nature of the individual mind [Text] / M.A. Kholodnaya. — SPb.: Peter, 2004. — 384 p.
9. Andrews, T.J. Correlated size variations in human visual cortex, lateral geniculate nucleus, and optic tract [Text] / T.J. Andrews, S.D. Halpern, D. Purves // Journal of Neuroscience. — 1997. — V. 17. — №8. — P. 2859–2868.
10. Chen, X. Cone properties of retinal margin cells in the monkey (Macaca mulatta) [Text] / X. Chen, K.C. Wikler, P.R. MacLeish // Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. — 2000. — V. 41. — №8. — P. 2019–2022.
11. Marcos, S. Coherent imaging of the cone mosaic in the living human eye [Text] / S. Marcos, R. Navarro, P. Artal // J Opt Soc Am A. — 1996. — V. 13. — №5. — P. 897–905.
12. Perry, V.H. The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: implications for central magnification factors [Text] / V.H. Perry, A. Cowey // Vision Res. — 1985. — V. 25. — №12. — P. 1795–1810.
13. Spear, P.D. Relationship between numbers of retinal ganglion cells and lateral geniculate neurons in the rhesus monkey [Text] / P.D. Spear, C.B. Kim, A. Ahmad, B.W. Tom // Vis Neurosci. — 1996. — V. 13. — №1. — P. 199–203.
14. Webster, M.A. Variations in normal color vision. II. Unique hues [Text] / M.A. Webster, E.Miyahara, G. Malkoc, V.E. Raker // J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. — 2000. — V. 17. — №9. — P. 1545–1555.
15. Variations in normal color vision. III. Unique hues in Indian and United States observers [Text] / M.A. Webster [et al.] // J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. — 2002. — V. 19. — №10. — P. 1951–1962.
16. Wuerger, S.M. The cone inputs to the unique-hue mechanisms [Text] / S.M. Wuerger, P. Atkinson, S. Cropper // Vision Res. — 2005. — V. 45. — №25–26. — P. 3210–3223.
About this article
Authors: Trubina O.M., Petrosyan E.A.
Year: 2014
|