|
|
|
February 2024, № 1 (241), pages 14-20doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-241-14
Egorova G.I., Marinova A.A. THE CONCEPTS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROFESSIONAL SELF-DETERMINATION AND FUNCTIONAL LITERACY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SENIOR STUDENTEmphasizing the importance and relevance of the processes of self-determination, professional self-determination and functional, academic literacy of senior schoolchildren, we note that these are the strategic guidelines and leading processes that should take place not in fragments, but continuously, which, of course, will give its positive result in the sustainable development of the younger generation. Revealing the problematic field of the relationship between the processes of professional self-determination and functional literacy of senior schoolchildren, we clarify the leading value-semantic concepts in educational practice. On the one hand, the Federal State Educational Standard, the Project “School of the Ministry of Education, “Profminimum”, Federal programs for the formation of UUD, Federal education programs require high quality and effectiveness of professional self-determination and the formation of functional literacy. On the other hand, it is difficult for the teacher to understand the conceptuality of these processes. On the other hand, the practice of parallelism of the paradigms of professional self-determination and functional literacy operating in a single educational environment of the educational community is proven. The disclosure of concepts and constants of the interrelation of these concepts in a paradigmatic way solves the key postulate — what is the subject’s choice of a characteristic paradigm, what are the conceptual approaches, principles underlying strategic guidelines for improving the quality of professional self-determination and functional literacy of high school students. This is the methodological basis that develops the paradigmatic self-determination of the teacher himself. The functional significance of paradigmatic concepts is important for quality management of the formation of professional self-determination and functional literacy of an older student, which allows the teacher to clearly answer a number of questions. What are the strategies and tactics of these processes in the context of a specific paradigm, concept as a platform for the socialization of an older student? How to solve the key tasks of self-determination and the formation of functional literacy? In the work, we take into account the dialectic of the relationship between the concepts of “student — self-determination — professional self-determination — functional literacy — professional choice — life meanings and values”. The experimental work shows a positive dynamics (%) of the effectiveness of the formation of value-semantic indicators of professional self-determination, self-determination, functional literacy of senior schoolchildren at the educational (EO) and ascertaining (EC) stages of the experiment.Key words: paradigm, concept, quality, conception, approach, professional self-determination, functional literacy, schoolchildren.
References:
1. Branskij V.P., Pozharskij S.D. (2002) Social’naya sinergetika i akmeologiya. Teoriya samoorganizacii individuuma. Sociuma [Social synergetics and acmeology. The theory of individual self-organization. society]. SPb., 476 p.
2. Ginzburg M.R. (1994) Psihologicheskoe soderzhanie lichnostnogo samoopredeleniya [Psychological content of personal self-determination]. Voprosy psihologii [Psychology issues], №3, pp. 43–54.
3. Zeer E.F., Symanyuk E.E. (2023) Psihologiya professional’nogo razvitiya [Psychology of professional development]. 3-rd ed., corrected and expanded. Moskva : Izd-vo “YUrajt”, 234 p. ISBN 978-5-534-14387-4.
4. Litavor V.S. (2013) Pedagogicheskij koncept kak sistemnoe kreativnoe proektirovanie obrazovatel’noj situacii [Pedagogical concept as a systemic creative design of an educational situation]. Gumanitarnyj vektor [Humanitarian vector], №4(36), pp . 265-261.
5. Lobok A.M. (2002) Dramaturgiya real’nogo pedagogicheskogo vzrosleniya, ili Kak vozmozhen pedagog veroyatnostnogo obrazovaniya v sovremennoj shkole [The dramaturgy of real pedagogical maturation, or How a teacher of probabilistic education is possible in a modern school]. Ekaterinburg: Izd. AMB, 166 p.
6. Lukov V.A. (2005) Paradigmy vospitaniya [Paradigms of education]. Gumanitarnye nauki: teoriya i metodologiya [Humanities: theory and methodology], №3, pp. 139-151.
7. Leont’ev A.N. (2019) Psihologicheskie osnovy razvitiya rebenka i obucheniya [Psychological foundations of child development and learning]. Moskva: Izd-vo “Smysl”, 230 p. ISBN: 978-5-89357-389-3
8. Mitrofanov K.G. (2012) Sovremennye instituty i tekhnologii professionalizacii uchitelya v sisteme nepreryvnogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya [Modern institutions and technologies for teacher professionalization in the system of continuous pedagogical education]: monografiya. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarskij kraev. in-t povysheniya kvalifikacii i prof. perepodgot. rabotnikov obrazovaniya, 315 p. ISBN 978-5-9979-0083-0
9. Muhin M.I. (2021) Obrazovanie v HKHI veke. Operezhayushchee razvitie [Education in the 21st century. Advanced development]. Monografiya. Moskva : Izd-vo “ARKTI”, 192 p. ISBN: 978-5-89415-490-9
10. CHvyakin V.A., Filonova A.S., Grigor’ev N.YU. (2019) K voprosu o professional’nom samoopredelenii podrostkov i starshih shkol’nikov [On the issue of professional self-determination of adolescents and high school students]. Monografiya. Moskva.: Mir nauki, 190 p. ISBN 978-5-6042806-2-1
11. SHadrikov V.D. (2009) Ot individa k individual’nosti. Vvedenie v psihologiyu [From individual to individuality. Introduction to psychology]. Moskva: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, p. 35. ISBN 978-5-9270-0162-0
12.SHCHekotin E.V. (2020) Paradigmal’nyj analiz koncepcij kachestva zhizni [Paradigmatic analysis of quality of life concepts]. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sociologii [Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology], №3, pp. 160-167
About this article
Authors: Egorova G.I., Marinova A.A.
Year: 2024
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-241-14
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|