|
|
|
June 2023, № 2 (238), pages 106-114doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-238-106
Toporkova O.V. INNOVATIONS IN THE SYSTEMS OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION AT THE PRESENT TIME The study of innovations in the systems of higher technical education of the leading countries of the world in the first decades of the 21st century is due to the possibilities of applying the valuable achievements of foreign pedagogical science and practice in solving urgent problems of domestic higher technical education, searching for ways to improve the quality of training of future engineers in our country. In the course of a theoretical study of the work of national and international accreditation agencies, professional engineering communities and associations to improve the quality of engineering education, it was found that graduates of accredited educational programs of engineering and technical bachelor’s degrees are fully prepared for integrated engineering activities, and master’s degree graduates — for innovative engineering activities. . The main approaches to the organization of education at a higher technical school abroad at the present stage are: traditional education based on a strict disciplinary curriculum, project-based learning, problem-based learning, and learning based on an integrated curriculum used in the CDIO approach, which has become widespread in the practice of higher education. technical school abroad in the first decades of the XXI century. There are features of the CDIO approach to reforming and designing engineering educational programs, innovations in the content of modern educational programs of higher technical education are presented, innovative technologies used in the practice of foreign higher technical schools are analyzed, and the main trends in the development of higher technical education at the present stage are presented.Key words: higher technical education, innovations in engineering education, engineering education abroad, competencies of engineers, complex engineering activities, innovative engineering activities, the CDIO initiative, MOOCs, flipped classroom.
References:
1. ZHurakovskij V. M. (2017). Sovremennye tendencii razvitiya inzhenernogo obrazovaniya na osnove integracii obrazovaniya, nauki i innovacij [Modern trends in the development of engineering education based on the integration of education, science and innovation]. Modernizaciya inzhenernogo obrazovaniya: rossijskie tradicii i sovremennye innovacii [Modernization of Engineering Education: Russian Traditions and Modern Innovations], pp. 13-27.
2. Naumkin N. I. (2017). Innovacionnye metody obucheniya v tekhnicheskom vuze [Innovative teaching methods at a technical university]. In P.V. Senin, L.V. Maslennikova, E.V. Majkov (Eds.). Saransk, Mordov Univ. Publish., 122 p.
3. Toporkova O.V. (2020). On the Content of Higher Technical Education Curricula Abroad: Current Trends (Review). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 153-167.
4. Chuchalin, A.I. (2018). Inzhenernoe obrazovanie v epohu industrial’noj revolyucii i cifrovoj ekonomiki [Engineering Education in the Epoch of Industrial Revolution and Digital Economy]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 10, pp. 47-62.
5. Alkhatib O. J. (2018). An interactive and blended learning model for engineering education. Journal of Computers in Education. Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19-48.
6. Castedo R., Lуpez L. M., Chiquito M., Navarro J., Cabrera J. D., Ortega M. F. (2019). Flipped classroom—comparative case study in engineering higher education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. Vol. 27(1), pp. 206-216.
7. Das S., Hanifin L. E., Newell S. (2010). A new responsive model for educational programs for industry: The university of Detroit Mercy advanced electric vehicle graduate certificate program. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars — Electronic and Electrical Systems. Vol. 3, Iss. 2, pp. 10-18. DOI: https://doi:10.4271/2010-01-2303
8. IEA (2013). Graduate Attributes and Professional Competences. Available at: https://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/Policy/Graduate-Attributes-and-Professional-Competencies.pdf
9. Karabulut-Ilgu A., Jaramillo Cherrez N., Jahren C. T. (2018). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 398-411.
10. Korhonen-Yrjдnheikki K., Tukiainen T., Takala M. (2007). New challenging approaches to engineering education: enhancing university–industry co-operation. European Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 167-179. DOI: 10.1080/03043790601118697
11. MIT (2020) 2020 OCW Impact Report. Available at: https://ocw.tau.edu.ng/about/site-statistics/2020-19_OCW_supporters_impact_report.pdf
12. Poulova P., Simonova I. (2016) Innovations in Software Engineering Subjects. // International Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence. Springer, Cham, pp. 323-332.
13. Sha D. By the numbers: MOOCs in 2020. Available at: https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2020
14. Yigit T., Koyun A., Yuksel A. S., Cankaya I. A. (2014). Evaluation of blended learning approach in computer engineering education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol 141. P. 807-812.
15. Yuan L., Powell S. J. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. Available at: http://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/619735/1/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf
About this article
Author: Toporkova O.V.
Year: 2023
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-238-106
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|