June 2020, № 3 (226), pages 64-80doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-226-64
Sikorska G.A., Dzhukashev K.R., Kryuchkova I.V. ABOUT THE PROBLEM OF IMPROVING THE MATHEMATICAL EDUCATION QUALITY AND PROPOSALS FOR ITS OVERCOMINGThe concept of the development of mathematical education in the Russian Federation has set the task — to bring Russian mathematical education to a leading position in the world; the role of mathematics is determined — the most important component of world scientific and technological progress; a direct dependence of the success of Russia of the 21st century on the level of mathematical science, mathematical education and mathematical literacy of the entire population is recorded. The article reveals the conditions of graduate competitiveness upon admission to any universities of the country; the shortcomings of the educational system of the Orenburg region are revealed; the relevance of developing the theory, concept and methodology of the process of innovative improving the quality of mathematical education of high school students is substantiated. The necessity of creating an educational center, a methodological association for the development of effective forms of achieving results, contributing to the dissemination of experience in the accumulation and transfer of best practices for the development of mathematical education of high school students, updating and transferring the best methodological experience of training teachers teaching mathematics in specialized physics and mathematics classes is substantiated. The planned project will allow updating educational programs, creating an educational product based on modern information technologies. The purpose of the educational product is the development of students' mathematical thinking, providing high school students with high-quality mathematical preparation for the exam at a profile level.Key words: mathematical education; graduate competitiveness; education system; the quality of the mathematical education of high school students; project; Education Centre; educational product; information Technology; USE in mathematics at the profile level.
References:
1. Reshu YEGE. Obrazovatel’nyy portal dlya podgotovki k ekzamenam. — URL: http://math.reshuege.ru/ (data obrashcheniya 17.05.2016).
2. Matnenko A.S. Prioritetnyy natsional’nyy proyekt “Obrazovaniye”: sushchnost’ i problemy realizatsii. // Elektronnyy resurs. — URL: http://www.lexed.ru//pravo/theory/ezegod2/?matnenko.html(data obrashcheniya 7.05.2020).
3. Matyushkin A.M. Problemnyye situatsii v myshlenii i obuchenii. M.: Pedagogika, 1972. — 168 s.
4. Mushtavinskaya I. V. Tekhnologiya razvitiya kriticheskogo myshleniya na uroke i v sisteme podgotovki uchitelya. Uchebno-metodicheskoye posobiye; KARO — , 2013. — 144 c.
5. Lutsenko Ye.L. Adaptatsiya testa kriticheskogo myshleniya L. Starki / Ye. L. Lutsenko // Vísnik Khark. nats. un-tu ímení V.N. Karazína. Seríya: Psikhologíya. — 2014. — № 1110. — S. 65-70.
6. Rasporyazheniye Pravitel’stva RF ot 24 dekabrya 2013 g. N 2506-r O Kontseptsii razvitiya matematicheskogo obrazovaniya v RF — URL: https://www.yandex.ru/search] (data obrashcheniya 2.05.2020).
7. Reshu YEGE. Obrazovatel’nyy portal dlya podgotovki k ekzamenam. — URL: http://math.reshuege.ru/ (data obrashcheniya 17.04.2020).
8. Rozov N., Smolyanskiy M. XII Vsesoyuznoy Olimpiady shkol’nikov po matematike // Kvant. — 1978. — № 10.
9. Sedova Ye.A. Primernyye programmy srednego (polnogo) obshchego obrazovaniya. Matematika: algebra i nachala matematicheskogo analiza, geometriya: 10-11 klassy / Ye.A. Sedova, S.V. Pchelintsev, T.M. Mishchenko i dr.; pod obshch. red. M.V. Ryzhakova. — M.: Ventana– Graf, 2012. — 136 s.
10. Skurygina, S. K. Vzglyady zarubezhnykh uchenykh na sushchnost’ kriticheskogo myshleniya / S. K. Skurygina. — Tekst : neposredstvennyy // Molodoy uchenyy. — 2016. — № 7 (111). — S. 708-710. — URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/111/27218/ (data obrashcheniya: 2.04.2020).
11. Terno S. A. Kontseptsiya kriticheskogo myshleniya v zarubezhnoy pedagogike [Elektronnyy resurs]/ C. A. Terno // Sovremennyye nauchnyye issledovaniya i innovatsii. — 2013. — № 8. –http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2013/08/26054. (Data obrashcheniya: 21.04.2020).
12. Tyaglo A.V., Voropay T.S. Kriticheskoye myshleniye: Problema mirovogo obrazovaniya 21 veka.– Khar’kov: Un-t vnutr. del, 1999. — 285 s.
13. Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart srednego (polnogo) obshchego obrazovaniya. Prikaz Min. obrazovaniya i nauki RF ot 17.05.2012g. №413. — URL: http://minobrnauki.rf/dokumenty/2365 (data obrashcheniya 2.05.2020).
14. Fridman L.M. Teoreticheskiye osnovy metodiki obucheniya matematike: Uchebnoye posobiye.– M.: Knizhnyy dom “LIBROKOM”, 2009. — 248 s.
15. Khalpern D. Psikhologiya kriticheskogo myshleniya: Uchebnoye posobiye. — SPb.: Izdatel’stvo “PITER”, 2000. — 512 s.
16. Chernykh A.A. Formirovaniye kachestv myshleniya studentov, kharakternykh dlya matematicheskoy deyatel’nosti i neobkhodimykh dlya polnotsennoy zhizni vobshchestve.–URL: http://michac.narod.ru/Konferencia/Matematika/Chern.doc (data obrashcheniya 7.05.2020).
17. Adie, L. (2013). The development of teacher assessment identity through participation in online moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20, 91–106. doi:10.1080/096 9594X.2011.650150
18. Berry O Donovan,Chris Rust &Margaret Price// A scholarly approach to solving the feedback dilemma in practice.– 2015.– Published online: 14 Jun 2015.– P.938-949https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052774
19. Cowie, B., & Moreland, J. (2015). Leveraging disciplinary practices to support students’ active participation in formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22, 247–264, doi:10.1080/0969594X.2015.1015960
20. Ganesh, D. Bhatt. Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people // Journal of Knowledge Management. V. 5. — 2014. — № 1.
21. Gotch, C. M., & French, B. F. (2014). A systematic review of assessment literacy measures. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33, 14–18. doi:10.1111/emip.12030
22. Felder, R.M. Effective Strategies for Cooperative Learning / R.M. Felder, R. Brent // J. Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teaching. — 2010. –№ 10(2).–R. 69– 75.
23. Vardi. Solutions to the year 2000 International Mathematical Olympiad // Preprint IHES/M/00/80. — 2000.
About this article
Authors: Sikorskaya G.A., Dzhukashev K.R., Kryuchkova I.V.
Year: 2020
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-226-64
|