|
|
|
February 2019, № 1 (219), pages 96-102doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-219-96
Sorokin V.M. PSYCHOLOGY OF THE EPIC IMAGE OF A BLIND IN RUSSIAN ART.ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE PICTURE G.M. KORZHEV “TALK”The article is devoted to the problem of the image of a disabled person in the visual arts. It is known that art explores the spiritual life of a person along with psychology. Predominantly, art analyzes with its own methods such aspects of a person’s psychic activity as emotions, personality, and behavior in extreme situations. For the psychoanalytic paradigm, art and, above all, literature, is a subtle way of in-depth analysis of unconscious human life. At the same time, it is of interest to study the peculiarities of the psychology of persons with various deviations in physical and mental development. The psychology of diontogenesis deals with this side of the subjective human life. Art also pays no small attention to this problem of human existence. Images of patients and cripples, beginning with the paintings by P. Bruegel the Elder, are extremely diverse and numerous both in the visual arts and in literature, and nowadays also in cinema. The picturesque images of patients reproduce the sometimes complex in structure of the disease, combining into a whole both subjective and objective elements of nosology. In addition, works of art in one way or another represent the attitude of society towards people with disabilities within the framework of various cultures in different periods of history. In the picture G.M. Korzheva “Conversation” blind peasant communicating with Lenin symbolizes Russia. The author, unlike the artist, does not use blindness as an end in itself image of otherness, attracting attention or being a simple symbol of sorrow, loneliness, unhappiness, etc. G.M. Korzhev rises to the philosophical level of the interpretation of the image of the blind, where the nosological aspect is fundamentally irrelevant. In this case, blindness is a form of a special organization of the people’s world view. The image of Lenin, a man who is sighted and enlightened, also has his own truth, but he did not convince the peasant. This is the essence of any tragedy — this is a clash of two truths. G.M. Korzhev is a true successor of the traditions of Russian psychological realism.Key words: blind, blind way, social stereotypes, the potential of persons with developmental disabilities
References:
1. Gudonis V. P. Osnovy i perspektivy social'noj adaptacii lic s ponizhennym zreniem [Basics and Prospects of Social Adaptation of Persons with Reduced Vision]. Moscow: Academy of Pedagogical and Social Sciences, 1999
2. Davydova O.S. CHelovek v iskusstve. Antropologiya vizual'nosti [Man in Art. Anthropology of visuality]. M., 2015.
3. Butler L.I. ZHivopis' i medicina [Painting and medicine]. M., 2010
4. Butler L.I. Muzyka i medicina [Music and medicine]. M., 2014
5. Eryshev O.F. Lichnost' i bolezn' v tvorchestve geniev [Personality and illness in the works of geniuses]. SPb., 2015
6. Efremov V. Psihopatologiya v literature i v zhizni [Psychopathology in literature and in life]. SPb., 2010
7. Umberto Eco On Ugliness. M., 2017
8. Krivtsun O.A. Psihologiya iskusstva [Psychology of art]. M., 2016
9. Nazarova N.M. Pennin G.N. Special'naya pedagogika v 3tt. [Special pedagogy in 3 vol.]. M., 2007, vol. 1
10. Necheporenko V.V. Psihicheskaya patologiya i tvorchestvo [Psychological pathology and creativity]. SPb., 2015
11. Raygorodsky LD. Peter Bruegel. Blind. Vestnik SPbGU [Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University], ser. 15, 2013, vol. 3
12. Sidorova V.V. Kul'tura obraza [Culture of the image]. Kharkov 2017
13. Sorokin V. M. The Image of the Blind in Painting. Razvitie nauki i praktiki obrazovaniya lic s narusheniem zreniya: problemy i perspektivy. IV mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya ICEVI, posvyashchennoj 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya V.A.Feoktistovoj [Development of science and practice of education of visually impaired: problems and prospects. IV International Scientific and Practical Conference ICEVI, dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the birth of V.A. Feoktistova]. St. Petersburg, 2010.
14. Troshin G.Ya. Antropologicheskie osnovy vospitaniya. Sravnitel'naya psihologiya normal'nyh i nenormal'nyh detej [Anthropological basis of education. Comparative psychology of normal and abnormal children]. In 2 vol. Pg, 1915.
15. Khaikin R.B. Hudozhestvennoe tvorchestvo glazami vracha [Artistic creativity through the eyes of a doctor]. SPb., 1992
16. Jordi Vigé, Melissa Ricketts Medicina v iskusstve [Medicine in Art]. M., 2009
17. Shipitsyna L.M., Sorokin V.M. Special'naya psihologiya [Special psychology]. M., 2017
18. Yarskaya-Smirnova E.R. Naburushkin E.K. Social'naya rabota s invalidami [Social work with the disabled]. SPb., 2004
19. Gudonis V. Changing of the Attitude towards the Disabled in the Course of History. Ibternational Journal of Psychology, vol. 35, June-August, 2000
20. Gudonis V. Lietuvos tiflopedagogikos istorija. Vilnius. 1985.
21. Gudonis V., Plepys S., Žilinskas J. Tiflologijos vardų žodynas. Šiauliai: Šiaulių universiteto l-kla. 2001.
About this article
Author: Sorokin V.M.
Year: 2019
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-219-96
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|