February 2019, № 1 (219), pages 6-14

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-219-6

Kamenskiy A.M. SCHOOL AND PARENTS: TRADITION, MODERNITY, PERSPECTIVEThe issues of interaction between the school and the family in the context of historical and cultural analysis depend on the emerging trends in the relationship between the parents of students and the public education system. At present, the pace of change is accelerating, the role of the family in raising a child is changing, private and state educational institutions are developing, digital technologies are being actively introduced into the education and everyday life of a person. Historical and pedagogical analysis has shown that the main directions of interaction of the parents of students with state educational institutions from ancient times to the present day can be traced both in Russia and in foreign educational systems. The peculiarities of the interaction between the school and the family today are due to the distinctive features of the current generation of children who are active users of computer technology. Based on the survey data, the need of modern schoolchildren in intergenerational communication and interaction with reputable adults is revealed. New approaches to the upbringing and education of the child will make it possible to intensify his creative, research abilities, expand the possibilities for constructive interaction between adults and students, create conditions conducive to the emergence of child-adult communities. There will be new forms of interaction between participants in educational activities, contributing to the harmonization of their interpersonal relationships, such as “educational trips”, “park lessons”, “geocaching”, “reconstruction”. The role of the psychological-acmeological service of the school in the organization of this work is important. The potential for interaction between the family and the school is far from exhausted, it does not exclude the need to use new pedagogical approaches not only in the educational and educational work of the school, but also in organizing out-of-school interaction between students and adults, and finding new forms of managing these complex processes.Key words: intergenerational interaction, state-public management, openness of education, generation Z, social partnership.

Download

References:

1. Boguslavskij M.V. Istoriko-pedagogicheskaya ehkspertiza innovacij v obrazovanii [Historical and pedagogical expertise of innovations in education]. Moscow: ISRORAO, 2015. 118 p.

2. Robotova A.S., Homenko I.A. Direktoru shkoly o sotrudnichestve s roditelyami [Principal on cooperation with parents]. Moscow: Sentyabr', 2001, 109 p.

3. Kamenskij A.M. Can the Board of Trustees work effectively in the existing legal framework? Narodnoe obrazovanie [Public education], 2006, no. 4, pp. 125–131.

4. Kamenskij A.M. Real and imaginary school changes. ZHurnal rukovoditelya upravlenie obrazovaniem [Journal of Education Leadership], 2011, no. 1, pp. 5–10

5. Kamenskij A.M. Samorazvitie shkoly (prakticheskoe posobie dlya direktora) [Self-development school (practical guide for principal)]. Moscow: Sentyabr', 2013, 224 p.

6. Karakovskij V.A. Vospitatel'naya sistema shkoly: pedagogicheskie idei i opyt reformirovaniya [Educational system of the school: pedagogical ideas and experience of reforming]. Moscow: IMO “Tvorcheskij pedagog”, 1991, 153 p.

7. Konarzhevskij YU.A. Menedzhment i vnutrishkol'noe upravlenie [Management and school management]. Moscow: Pedagogicheskij poisk, 1999, 191 p.

8. Krichevskij V.YU. Ocherki istorii i teorii upravleniya obrazovaniem [Essays on the history and theory of education management]. SPb.: SPbGUPM, 2001, 201 p.

9. Makarenko A.S. Metodika organizacii vospitatel'nogo processa [Methods of organization of educational process]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1988, 190 p.

10. Manujlov YU.S. Sredovoj podhod v vospitanii [Environmental approach in education]. Moscow: V.V, 2002, 156 p.

11. Novikova L.I. Samoupravlenie v shkol'nom kollektive [Self-Government in the school team]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1988, 190 p.

12. Pozdnyakov A.N. Istoriya pedagogiki i obrazovaniya za rubezhom i v Rossii [History of pedagogy and education abroad and in Russia]. Saratov.: Izd. Centr “Nauka”, 2009, 143 p.

13. Potashnik M.M. EHksklyuzivnye aspekty upravleniya shkoloj: posobie dlya rukovoditelej obrazovatel'nyh uchrezhdenij i ih zamestitelej [Exclusive aspects of school management: a guide for heads of educational institutions and their deputies]. Moscow: Pedagogicheskoe obshchestvo Rossii, 2011, 317 p.

14. Stepanov P.V. Razvitie shkoly kak vospitatel'noj sistemy [Development of the school as an educational system]. Moscow: Pedagogicheskij poisk, 2009, 240 p.

15. Suhomlinskij V.A. Metodika vospitaniya kollektiva [Collective education methods]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1981, 192 p.

16. SHackij S.T. Pedagogicheskie sochineniya [Pedagogical works]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1964, 273 p.

17. Niehoff M. Three ways model collaboration and partnership in schools and classrooms. Getting Smart, 2018, no. 2.

18. Stewart W.A. The Educational Innovators: Progressive Schools 1881–1967. Masmillan and Co Ltd., 1968, vol. II.

19. Yang J., La Bounty T.J., Ekker S.C., Pierret C. Students being and becoming scientists: measured success in a novel science education partnership. Palgrave communications, 2016, no. 3.

About this article

Author: Kamenskiy A.M.

Year: 2019

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-219-6

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru