March 2018, № 3 (215), pages 97–102

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-215-97

Sorokin V.M. SEMIOTICS OF THE IMAGE OF A BLIND PERSON IN THE SPACE OF FINE ART (M.V. NESTEROV «IN RUSSIA: THE SOUL OF THE PEOPLE»)Psychology traditionally uses the method of analyzing the products of activity and their content side. Similar products are works of art, which are rarely the subject of psychological analysis other than the psychology of art. Unlike art criticism, the psychological analysis of works of art is aimed at reproducing the very process of creating a pictorial, sculptural or literary work. Art itself is capable of penetrating deeply into the phenomena of the psychic and in a number of cases makes it more effective than psychology itself. So the sphere of feelings, relationships and personality are studied in art more comprehensively than in the sciences of man. The appeal of psychology to the analysis of works of art is the interaction of two forms of cognition — emotional-figurative and categorical-conceptual. In this sense, it is logical to address the psychology of dysontogenesis to the analysis of the artistic representation of the attitude of society towards persons with developmental disabilities. The article shows that the art often refers to the image of a sick person. The motives for such treatment can be very different. But most often they are associated with the implementation of simple open symbolic images that are well understood by the viewer. Such as sadness, misfortune, loneliness, injustice, heartache, etc. Among all groups of disabled people, most often in the space of simple symbolism, the image of a blind person is used because of the most expressive and comprehensible plastics. The blind man is easily recognizable along with the armless or legless cripple. The images of a disabled person, devoid of self-aim and simple symbolism, are a rare phenomenon and are more likely to be found in works of art that are essentially a philosophical message. First of all, such works include works by M.V. Nesterov, in which the image of the patient is a symbol of the strength of the spirit.Key words: blind, blind way, social stereotypes, the potential of persons with developmental disabilities.

Download

References:

1. Davydov O. The man in the art. Anthropology visuality. M. 2015 butler

2. LI Arts and medicine. Moscow, 2010

3. Butler LI Music and medicine. M. 2014

4. Eryshev OF Personality and illness in the work of geniuses. SPb., 2015

5. History of ugliness. Etc. Umberto Eco. M., 2017

6. Krivtsun OA Psychology of art. M., 2016

7. Nazarova NM Pennine GN Special Education in 3tt., Ie 1M., 2007

8. Necheporenko VV Psychopathology and creativity SPb. 2015

9. Raigorodskii LD Pieter Brueghel. Blind. St. Petersburg State University Bulletin. Ser. 15. 2013. Vol. 3

10. Sidorov V. image culture. Kharkov 2017

11. Troshin GY Anthropological foundations of education. Comparative psychology of normal and abnormal children: In 2 t. Pg, 1915.

12. Haykin RB Artistic creation medical eyes. SPb., 1992Efremov V. Psychopathology in literature and in life. SPb., 2010

13. Jordi Vigo Ricketts Melissa Medicine in art. Moscow, 2009

14. LM Shipitsina Sorokin VM Special psychology. M., 2017

15. Iarskaia-Smirnova ER E.K.Naberushkin Social work with people with disabilities. SPb., 2004

About this article

Author: Sorokin V.M.

Year: 2018

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-215-97

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru