Vestnik On-line
Orenburg State University november 20, 2024   RU/EN
Headings of Vestnik
Pedagogics
Psychology
Other

Search
Vak
Антиплагиат
Orcid
Viniti
ЭБС Лань
Rsl
Лицензия Creative Commons

October 2017, № 11 (211), pages 67–72

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-211-67

Snigireva O.M., Talalay T.S. LINGUISTIC PRAGMATICS OF THE ADVERTISING TEXTThe pragmatic function of advertising messages increasingly is the object of modern linguistic research, since the effect on the addressee is the goal of any advertising text. The advertising message as the unit of communication has its own linguistic expression and pragmatic functions. The linguistic expression of the pragmatic function of advertising texts in different languages is different, which is due to linguistic and cultural specifics. The research is based on a corpus of advertising texts provided in the German magazines “Der Spiegel”, “Cosmopolitan”, “Petra”, “Brigitte”, “Geliebte Katze”, “Happy Way”. An important aspect in the study of pragmatic functions of the advertising text is the selection of linguistic means of creating vivid and memorable image, which actualizes the emotional capacity of verbal influence on the recipient. The results of the research show that the main language means for expressing the pragmatic function of German-language advertising texts, in contrast to Russian-speaking ones, are key words, stylistic figures, neologisms, Anglo-Americanisms, phraseological units, elements of colloquial speech and sentence structure. From the above it follows that the use of linguistic tools to perform pragmatic tasks is to attract the attention of potential consumers and create his motivation for the purchase of goods or services.Key words: pragmatics, advertising message, language tools, communication, influence, suggestion, neologisms, tropes, linguistic manipulation.

Download
References:

1. Voyekova AA Structural and functional features of interrogative sentences / A.A. Voyekova // Bulletin of TSPU. — 2015. — No. 69159). — P.113-117.

2. Katykhina L.N. Structure and semantics of advertising slang / L.N. Katykhina // News of the South-Western State University. — 2016. — No. 4 (21). — P. 90 — 95.

3. Kuryanovich A.V. Ways of realization of voluntarily communicative installations in modern epistolary texts of advertising character / A.V. Kuryanovich // Bulletin of TSPU. — 2009. — No. 4 (82). — P. 107-111.

4. Mityagina V.A. Anglicism in the advertising text: a sign of globalization? / V.А. Mityagin // Bulletin of the Moscow State University of International Relations. — 2012. — No. 9 (642). — P. 169-177.

5. Pirogova Y. K Strategy communication effect in advertising: the experience of typology [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.createbrand.ru/biblio/marketing/strategia.html

6. Safina A.V., Gazizov R.A. On the question of the signs of speech manipulation and the means of its expression / A.V. Safina, A.R. Gazizov // Bulletin of the Bashkir University. — 2015. — T.20. — No. 3. — P. 1027 — 1030.

7. Tararyko TA use of adjectives as a language means of expression in gender-marked German advertising texts / TA Tararyko // Omsk Scientific Bulletin. — Omsk, 2006. — No. 6 (41). — P. 236-239. 8. Yushkova L.A. Specificity of motivational relations in colloquial word formation / L.A. Yushkova / Science and business: ways of development. — 2014. — No. 12 (42). — P. 58-61.

9. Batra, R. & Ray, M. L. (1985). How Advertising Works at Contact. In L. F. Alwitt & A. A. Mitchell (Hrsg.), Psychological Processes and Advertising Effects (S. 13-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

10. Batra, R. & Ray, M. L. (1986). Affective Responses Mediating Acceptance of Advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(September), 234-249.

11. B. Baumgartner. Einsatz von Mixture Conjoint-Modellen zur Messung der Werbewirkung /Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, February 2005, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 53–78

12. Bershadskaya L., Chugunov A., Filatova O., Trutnev D. E-Governance and E-Participation Services: an Analysis of Discussions in Russian Social Media // CeDEM14. Proceedings of the International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government. 21-22 May 2014, Danube University Krems, Austria / Ed. P. Parycek, N. Edelmann. P. 573-578.

13. Derbaix, C. M. (1995). The impact of affective reactions on attitudes toward the advertisement and the brand: A step toward ecological validity. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(4),1995. — с. 470-479.

14. H. Gierl, R. Helm, M. Satzinger. Die Wirkung positiver und negativer Aussagen in der Werbung vor dem Hintergrund des Message Framing // Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung. — May 2000, Volum 52, Issue 3, pp 234–256

15. S. Sieglerschmidt. Werbung im thematisch passenden Medienkontext/ Monographie. — Gabler, GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden. — 2008. — pp 91-116.


About this article

Authors: Snigireva O.M., Talalay T.S.

Year: 2017

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-211-67

Editor-in-chief
Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

Crossref
Cyberleninka
Doi
Europeanlibrary
Googleacademy
scienceindex
worldcat
© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru
1999–2024 © CIT OSU