|
|
|
November 2017, № 12 (212), pages 4–6doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-212-4
Glukhikh M.A., Kalganov A.A. DYNAMICS OF SOIL FERTILITY IN THE TRANS-URALSFor many years of research, the content of humus, as the main indicator of fertility, in chernozem soils of the Trans-Urals varies depending on the conditions in a rather large range, and in the absence of erosion processes it remains in relative equilibrium. Periodically, other, directly opposite results appear in the press, but most authors start from the fact that the soil of all variants of the experiment has the same initial properties, which in nature does not exist. Therefore, it remains an open question about the dynamics of organic matter with sufficiently long-term agricultural use of soils. Long-term stationary experiments in grain-steamed crop rotation have been carried out to study the dynamics of the organic matter content in the soils of the Shadrinskaya Experimental Station. T.S. Maltsev, the northern forest-steppe of the Trans-Ural region, depending on different methods of soil cultivation and fertilization levels, selected layer by layer to a depth of 50 cm since 1969. The humus content remains at the same level for 20 years. This is also noted with very intensive tillage, and in the steam field — even twice. Some change in the humus content of the soil of only the upper horizons is noted. When dumping without fertilization, the humus content in the 0–20 cm layer remains at the same level. With soil-free tillage without fertilizers, there is a tendency for it to decrease when fertilizers are introduced and this phenomenon disappears. It was revealed that the humus content for different methods of soil treatment for almost thirty-year period, despite quite significant fluctuations in the years, remains at the same level. In the experiment using different doses of organic and mineral fertilizers, the revealed difference in the content of humus in the soil between the variants is not due to fertilizer doses, but to variegated soil cover.
References:
1. Ufimceva L.V., Pokatilova A.N., Glaz N.V., Kofan A.I. Bufernost' k kislotam kak pokazatel' ehkologo-geohimicheskoj ustojchivosti chernozemnyh pochv chelyabinskoj oblasti k tekhnogennoj nagruzke // Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki. 2013. № 5 (67). S. 75-78.
2. Sinyavskij I.V., Valiahmetova YU.Z. Aktivnost' bobovo-rizobial'nogo apparata i produktivnost' lyucerny sinegibridnoj pri raznyh urovnyah mineral'nogo pitaniya v usloviyah lesostepnoj zony chelyabinskoj oblasti // Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2008. T. 2. № 18-1. S. 33-35.
3. Kramarenko M.V. Dinamika produktivnosti mnogoletnih bobovo-myatlikovyh travosmesej pri raznoj intensivnosti vnedreniya v agrofitocenoz vegetativno-podvizhnogo myatlikovogo komponenta // Vestnik Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2015. № 4 (126). S. 58-61.
4. Panfilov A.EH. Produktivnyj potencial kukuruzy i faktory ego realizacii v lesostepi YUzhnogo Zaural'ya: avtoref. dis…d. s.-h. nauk / GNU Sibirskij nauchno-issledovatel'skij institut kormov SO RASKHN. Novosibirsk, 2005.
5. Kazakova N.I. Organogenez i produkcionnyj process ul'trarannego i rannespelogo gibridov kukuruzy v svyazi so srokami poseva v severnoj lesostepi Zaural'ya: avtoref. dis…kand. s.-h. nauk. // Permskaya gosudarstvennaya sel'skohozyajstvennaya akademiya im. D.N. Pryanishnikova. Perm', 2012.
6. Tyurin I. V. Iz rezul'tatov rabot brigady AN SSSR po izucheniyu sistemy obrabotki pochv po sposobu T. S. Mal'ceva na SHadrinskoj opytnoj stancii. // Pochvovedenie. 1957. № 8. S. 1-11.
7. Gluhih M. A., Sobyanin V. B., Sobyanina O. B. Plodorodie chernozemov Zaural'ya i ego dinamika. / Pod redakciej M. A. Gluhih. Monografiya. CHelyabinsk: CHGAA, 2010. 300 s.
8. Kushnirenko YU.D., Bragin V.N., YUmashev H.S. Problemy vosproizvodstva plodorodiya pochv i ih prakticheskoe reshenie pri realizacii nacional'nogo proekta razvitiya APK na YUzhnom Urale // Sovershenstvovanie adaptivno-landshaftnyh sistem zemledeliya na YUzhnom Urale. Sbornik / sost. A.V. Vrazhnov. — CHelyabinsk, GUP “Transport”, 2006. — 160 s.
9. Sirota S. M. Optimizaciya mineral'nogo pitaniya v sistemah udobreniya ovoshchnyh kul'tur i kartofelya na yuge Zapadnoj Sibiri: avtoref. dis…d. s.-h. nauk. M., 2008. 43 s.
10. Stevenson F. S. Nitrogen in agricultural soils. Madison, Wisconsin. USA. 1982. 443 p.
11. Zhantaly P.I. The problem of humus in irrigation soil of the south west region of Ukraine // Vіsnik Odes'kogo nacіonal'nogo unіversitetu. Geografіchnі ta geologіchnі nauki. 2012. T. 17. № 2 (15). S. 54-58.
12. Rushenko L.O. The effect of trenching the chernozem southern in vineyards on the indicators of its humus status // Agrohіmіya і gruntoznavstvo. 2015. № 84 (84). S. 138-141.
13. Tsybul’ka N.N., Zhukova I.I., Zhilko V.V. Losses of humus and nutrients from soddy-podzolic soils as a result of water erosion //Eurasian Soil Science. 2004. T. 37. № 6. S. 659-664.
14. Götze P., Rücknagel J., Holzweißig B., Steinz M., Christen O., Jacobs A., Märländer B., Koch H.-J. Sugar beet rotation effects on soil organic matter and calculated humus balance in central Germany // European Journal of Agronomy. 2016. Т. 76. С. 198-207.
15. SHklyar V.M. Humus state of gray forest soil depending on the fertilization system and chemical melioration // Peredgіrne ta gіrs'ke zemlerobstvo і tvarinnictvo. 2015. № 58-1. S. 219-226.
16. Kravchenko Y. Content and dynamics of chernozem humus effected by conservation tillage // SWorldJournal. 2013. T. 21309. S. 118-122.
About this article
Authors: Gluhih M.A., Kalganov A.A.
Year: 2017
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-212-4
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|