October 2017, № 10 (210)

Allagulov A.M. ON THE ISSUE OF EDUCATION OF MODERN YOUTH IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATIONEducation of modern Russian youth is a strategic task of the state educational policy. The existing model of educational work in educational organizations does not meet the modern requirements in the field of education of youth, enshrined in the “Strategy for the development of education in the Russian Federation for the period until 2025” (2015). In pedagogical science there is a potential in resolving the existing contradictions, but it requires a more thorough treatment of this problem by the authorities at all levels. The study showed that the functioning model of youth education was influenced by the oriental features of Russian civilization, which resulted in emphasis on such educational mechanisms as tradition, rituals, symbols and attributes, canons. The authoritarian and dogmatic model, which is inherently inherent in its nature, violates the principle of naturalness and leads directly to the opposite result — latent protest movement of young people. An analysis of domestic and foreign publications showed that modern youth is referred to by the term “Generation Y”, or “Generation Millennium”. In recent years, society and the state have begun to pay more attention to civic and patriotic education that fosters the formation of a political culture for young people. The current practice of organizing youth education in modern educational organizations requires its modernization aimed at developing and implementing a whole set of educational impacts not only on youth but also on parents and teachers. Historical and pedagogical experience proves that education has always prevailed over teaching in the national pedagogical tradition. Educational methods should reflect the essence of modern youth, manifested in their values and attitudes. The methodological basis of these methods should be the formed critical thinking (critical thinking) among young people.Key words: education, educational policy, civil-patriotic education, historical and pedagogical experience, the concept of free education, the modern theory of youth education, basic national values.

Download

References:

1. Antonova L.N., Zubova E.I. Education in conditions of social diversity: the interaction of family and school / / Academia. Pedagogical Journal of the Moscow Region. 2016. No. 4 (10). C.3-8.

2. Boguslavsky M.V. Methodology and technologies of education (historical and pedagogical context): monograph. Moscow: ITIP RAO, 2007. 236 pp.

3. Vishnevsky Yu. R., Shapko VT Paradoxical young man // Socis. 2006. № 6. С.26-37.

4. Kovshov R.V., Shevelev A.N. Crises of domestic school education: history and modernity: a monograph. St. Petersburg: Publishing house “Lubavitch”, 2016. 356 p.

5. Kostyleva S.Yu., Petrova S.V., Popovicheva NE, Allagulov A.M. Neklyudov S.Yu., Kalmykov N.N. On the Draft Federal Targeted Program for the Development of Education for 2016-2020 // Alma mater. Herald of the Higher School. 2016. № 2. P.5-12

6. Lukov V.A. Youth theories: interdisciplinary analysis. Moscow: Canon-plus, 2012. 656 p.

7. Merkulov P.A., Malik E.N., Budarina K.A. Institutionalization of youth organizations and associations in modern Russia: problems and prospects // Vlast. 2015. № 4. P. 140-145.

8. Musin-Pushkin A.A. Secondary school in Russia and its importance. Pg., 1915. 148 pp.

9. Free education in Russia: K.N. Venttsel and SN. Durylin: An anthology of pedagogical thought / Ed.-Comp. G.B. Cornetov. Moscow: ASOU, 2008. 359 p.

10. Shulman M.N., Reeves S.M. From the school-commune to the children's town of. October revolution. Odessa, 1922. 45 p.

11.Archard D. Should We Teach Patriotism? // Studies in Philosophy and Education. 1999. 18 (3). P. 157-173.

12. Balynin I.V. Political culture of younger generation of Russians: survey results 2014 // ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science.2015. №3. — pp. 25-32.

13. Byrnes, J.P. Naive theories and decisionmaking as part of higher order thinking in social studies / J.P. Byrnes, J.V. Torney-Purta // Theory and Research in Social Education. — 1995. — Vol. 23 (3). — P. 260–277.

14. Dewey J. Democracy and Education. N.Y., 1916.— 434 P

15. Marcelo K., Lopez M., and Kirby E. Civic engagement among young men and women. Washington DC : Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. 2007.

16. Ravitch D. Should We Teach Patriotism? // Phi Delta Kappan. 2006. April. P. 579 — 581.

17. Saranga K. Mais que font les parents? // Nouvel Observateur. 2000, 15 декабря

18. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Gabriel A. Almond and Sidney Verba. SAGE Publications, 1989. 389 pp.

About this article

Author: Allagulov A.M.

Year: 2017

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru