April 2017, № 5 (205)

Rattanaporn B., Pripadchev A.A. LANGUAGE AND SPEECH AS THE BASIS FOR DISTINGUISHING PHONEMATIC, AND PROSODIC OF I.S TURGENEV’ WORKSThe article is devoted to the study of the interaction of language and speech in the text. In this paper, the question of examining vocal sounds as phonemes and facts of the language and as prosodem and facts of speech is raised. The article focuses attention on the insufficient study of the russian stress sound in the historical and functional aspects. The article deals with the names of nouns in the form of a single and plural with fixed emphasis on the vowel “ы” , which assimilated its original longitude and the former old acuter rising tone. Derivatives from these names is a part of speech relatedness which later did not described in the origin. In the conducted of the research focus on the concepts as “language” and “speech”. The essence of the language lies in the distinctive signification, in the identification, thereby leads to the purpose of phonetic system of speech in the text and to the identification of sound. As a result of the work, the illegality of the phoneme values as a set of differential features and the significance of prosodem as their speech functions (meanings) in the text for the purpose of revealing the phonemic, phonetic and prosodic system of the text.Key words: language, speech, text, phoneme, prosodies, meaning, significance, systemic.

Download

References:

1. Avanesov, R.I. Udarenie v sovremennom russkom literaturnom yazyke / R.I. Avanesov. — M.: Nauka, 1958. — S. 5.

2. Bryzgunova, E.A. Zvuki i intonaciya russkoj rechi / E.A. Bryzgunova. — M.: Nauka, 1977. — 81 s.

3. Zaliznyak, A.A. Ot praslavyanskoj akcentuaciya k russkoj / A.A. Zaliznyak. — M.: Nauka, 1985. — 48 s.

4. Kolesov, V.V. Istoriya russkogo udareniya / V.V. Kolesov. — Leningrad, 1972. — 256 s.

5. Nahtigal, R. Slavyanskie yazyki / R. Nahtigal. — M.: Nauka, 1963. — 314 s.

6. Pripadchev, A.A. Istoricheskaya grammatika russkogo yazyka: ucheb. posobie / A.A. Pripadchev. — Voronezh: Izd-vo VGU, 1996. –76 s.

7. Pripadchev, A.A. Sravnitel'naya fonetika slavyanskih yazykov / A.A. Pripadchev. — Voronezh, 1994. — 88 s.

8. Sossyur, F. Trudy po yazyko-znaniyu / F. Sossyur. — M.: Nauka, 1977. — 85 s.

9. Turgenev, I.S. Zapiski ohotnika / I.S. Turgenev // Turgenev I.S. Polnoe SOBR. Soch.: v 30 t., izd., ispr. i dop. — M.: Russkij yazyk, 1979. — T. 3.

10. Stat'ya yavlyaetsya verifikaciej koncepcii, opublikovannoj v VESTNIK VGU , no aprobiruemaya v dannoj stat'ej na drugom materiale.

11. Dybo, V. A Tonological Hypothesis on the Origin of Paradigmatic Accent System / V. Dybo, S. Nikolayev, S. Starostin. — EPPh, 1978. — R. 16.

12. Helimski, E. Notes on the Origin of Prosodic Features in some Samoyed and Ugric Language / E. Helimski. — EPPh. 1978. — R. 35–38.

13. Peiros, I. Proto-Turkish Vowel Length: a Possibility of Reinterpretation / I. Peiros. — EPPh, 1978. — R. 79–81.

14. Starostin, S. Preliminary Remarks on Accent Correspondences between some Languages of Dagestan / S. Starostin. — EPPh, 1978. — R. 88–90.

15. J. Jedvaj. Bednjanski govor / J. Jedvaj. // Hrvatski dijalektoloski zbornik. — Knj. l. — Zagreb,1995.

About this article

Authors: Rattanaporn B., Pripadchev A.A.

Year: 2017

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru