Pavlova A.V. STATE IN THE CONCEPTUAL SPACE OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGEThe article is devoted to revealing the role of STATE as a knowledge structure in the conceptual space of modern English language. State senses having got nominative or discursive verbalization are the material of our research. As a result of conceptual-definitional analysis of lexemes state and condition we define the integral conceptual characteristic of concept STATE — “stativity”, which being related to the objects of certain conceptual domains (MAN, NATURE, SOCIETY, SYSTEM), provide construing of the necessary state sense. Such structure is defined as cognitive matrix, it means the system interrelated cognitive contexts. The analysis of linguistic unites, taken with the method of continuous sampling from the British national corpus (BNC) and the Corpus of contemporary American English (COCA), gives us the opportunity to prove the fundamental and all-permeating nature of the knowledge structure under research. Functional openness of STATE concept, its structural and semantic relatedness with conceptual domain, inference as a result of secondary representation of knowledge about the world prove modus (interpretative) character of STATE. In language there are a lot of different ways of representation of stative senses and all of them are united in the category of linguistic stativity. To analyze it we argue to use Prototype theory and the method of prototypes (Rosch et al.) and describe the nuclear zone, the zone of close and far periphery. As central criteria of defining nuclear-periphery character of language units of stativity we can suggest the following: 1) antecedence of realization of stative function; 2) predicativity; 3) semantic relatedness with conceptual domain.Key words: state, form of linguistic cognition, conceptualization, interpretation, linguistic stativity.
References:
1. Boldyrev N.N. Categories as a form of knowledge representation in language // The conceptual space of language. — Tambov, 2005. P. 16-39.
2. Boldyrev N.N. On knowledge typology and its representation in language // Types of knowledge and its representation in the language. — Tambov, 2007. P. 12 — 28.
3. Boldyrev N.N. Cognitive schemas of linguistic interpretation // Voprosy Kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2016. № 4. P. 10 — 20.
4. Bulygina T.V. Language conceptualization of the world (on the basis of the Russian grammar) // T.V. Bulygina, A.D. Shmelev. — M.: Shkola «Yaziki russkoi kultury», 1997. — 576 p.
5. Vasilyev L.M. System semantic dictionary of the Russian language. Issue 3: The predicates of state. Publishing house of Bashkir state university, 2002. — 88 p.
6. Vasilyev L.M. System semantic dictionary of the Russian language. Issue 6: The predicates of emotional states and conation. Publishing house of Bashkir state university, 2004. — 64 p.
7. Vinogradov V.V. The Russian language. Grammatical study about a word. — M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1972. — 616 p.
8. Greimas A.J., Fontanille J. Semiotics of passion. From the states of things to the state of the mind: Trans. from Fren. / Preface by K. Silberberg. — M.: LKI Publishing house, 2007. — 336 p.
9. Ilyish B.A. The structure of modern Englsh. — In English. — M.-L.: Prosveshhenie, 1965. — 243 с.
10. Pavlova A.V.Syntactic means of expressing the category of state in the English language // Bulletin of Chelyabinsk state university. 2013. № 24(315). Philology. Arts. Issue. 82. P. 128 — 130.
11. Pavlova A.V. Functional-semantic field of state in the English language // Gumanitarnie nauki I obrazovanie. 2005. № 1(21). P. 107 — 109.
12. Pavlova A.V. State as a linguistic knowledge format (based on modern English language) // Voprosy Kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2016. № 3. P. 96 — 102.
13. Seliverstova O.N. Cognitive semantics and the general development of linguistics // Voprosy yazikoznaniya. 2002. № 6. P. 12 — 26.
14. Seliverstova O.N. Works on semantics. — M.: Yaziki slavyanskoi cultury, 2004. — 960 p.
15. Semantic types of predicates. M.: Nauka, 1982. — 366 p.
16. Stepanov Y.S. On the universal classification of predicates // Izvestiya AS SSSR. Series of literature and language. — M.: Nauka, 1980. — V.39, issue. 4. — P. 311 — 323.
17. Shabanova T.D. Semantic modal of verbs of vision in th English language : Theoretical-experimental research : avtoref. diss. … doctor od Phlology : 10.02.04 / Institut yazikoznania RAS. — Moskva-Ufa, 1998. — 38 p.
18. Shcerba L.V. Language system and oral activity. L.: Nauka, 1974 — 428 p.
19. Armstrong D.M. A world of states of affairs // Philosophical Perspectives, V. 7, Issue Language and Logic. 1993. P. 429 — 440.
20. Evans V. From the spatial to the non-spatial: The “state” lexical concepts of in, on and at. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (eds.) Language, Cognition & Space. London: Equinox, 2010, P. 350 — 387.
21. Jackendoff R. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1990. — 336 p.
22. Lang E., Maienborn C. Two-level Semantics: Semantic Form and Conceptual Structure. In: HSK 33.1, 2011, P. 709-740.
23. Michaelis Laura A. Stative by construction // Linguistics 49-6, 2011, P. 1359 — 1399.
24. Mourelatos A. Events, processes and states // Linguistics and philosophy. 1978. № 2. P. 415 — 434.
25. Rothmayr A. Structure of stative verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing company, 2009. — 216 p.
26. Sheets-Johnstone M. The primacy of movement (Expanded 2nd edition) // Advances in consciousness research. Series A: Theory and method. Contributions to the development of theory and method in the study of consciousness. V. 82. — Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011. — 574 p.
27. Vendler Z. Facts and Events // Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y., 1967. P. 12-146.
28. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. — Harlow:
Longman Group, 2003. — 1949 p.
29. Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners (plus CD-
ROM). — Oxford: Macmillan Education, 2002.
30. The Oxford Dictionary and Thesaurus. — Oxford-Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1997.
About this article
Author: Pavlova A.V.
Year: 2017
|