|
|
|
Stelmach V.Y. CONCEPT AND SYSTEM OF MEANS OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGSThe article discusses the concept of "means of proof in criminal proceedings". Based on the analysis put forward in the science point of view the author believes that the means of proof should be those specific actions, through which the production of evidence gathering. Currently, the system of evidence: 1) investigative actions directly under criminal procedural law and regulated in detail to them; 2) The other procedural actions of the investigator (query); 3) The verification activities that occur in the stage of a criminal case; 4) operational-search measures; 5) legal action powerless protector and other participants in criminal proceedings; 6) actions taken in the framework of other activities (for example, administrative and legal). The probative value of the results of these actions differ. Thus, the results of investigation as the main sources of evidence have a direct probative value, and does not require any additional procedures for the introduction of the information received in the criminal proceedings. The results of other legal proceedings also have probative value, but by their conduct unacceptable to seize objects that are material evidence. The results of some validation activities have independent probative value (for example, audits and documentary checks), while others can be re-obtained during the investigation. The results of operatively-search actions acquire probative value after entering a special procedure in criminal proceedings. Action Results powerless direct participants in criminal proceedings of evidence do not matter, and sent powerful parties to the criminal proceedings that are required to make the necessary investigations. The results of actions carried out under other procedural regulation (for example, administrative and legal) acquire probative value only if these actions are performed prior to the initiation of criminal proceedings, and thus complied with the procedure of these actions, the rule of law provided for the relevant industry.Key words: criminal proceedings, evidence and proof, means of proof, investigations, legal proceedings, inspection activities, the operational-search activities.
References:
1. Agutin A.V. Ideas in criminal procedure proving: Abstract.... Dis. Dr. jurid. Sciences: 12.00.09 / A.V. Agutin. — Nizhny Novgorod, 2005. p.28-29.
2. Arestova E.N. New Procedure Act — the petition of the suspect on the inquiry in an abbreviated form // the Russian justice. 2013. №11. P.33
3. Balakshin V.S. Admissibility of evidence: the concept, legal nature, value estimation algorithm: scientific and practical guide. — Yekaterinburg, Publisher UMTS UPI, 2013. — 316 p.
4. Borodin S.V. The concept of penal policy through the prism of a systematic approach // the Russian justice. 2014. №3. P.53.
5. Girko SI Policing in criminal proceedings: Monograph / S.I. Girko. — M.: Institute of the Russian Interior Ministry, 2013. — 224 p.
6. Davletov A.A. Fundamentals of Criminal Procedure of knowledge. — 2nd ed.. and ext. — Ekaterinburg: Publisher Humanitarian University, 1997. — 191 p.
7. Davletov A.A. Criminal proceedings: Textbook / A.A. Davletov. — Yekaterinburg: Ural Law Institute of the Russian Interior Ministry, 2013. — 315 p.
8. Dorokhov V.Ya. Notion and classification of evidence (Sec. IV). In the book.: The theory of evidence in the Soviet criminal trial / The Editorial.: Zhogin N.V. (Ed. Ed.), — 2nd ed.. and ext. — M.: Jurid. lit., 1973. — 736 p.
9. Zazhitsky V.I. Additions to the article. 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: the pros and cons // the Russian justice. 2013. №11. P.30-31.
10. Instructions on how to submit the results of operatively-search activity the body of inquiry, the investigator or the court. Approved. the order of the Interior Ministry of Russia, the Russian Defense Ministry, the FSB of Russia, Russian Federal Security Service, Federal Customs Service of Russia, the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, Russian Federal Penitentiary Service, Federal Drug Control Service of Russia Investigative Committee of Russia on September 27, 2013 №776/703/509/507/1820/42/535/398 / 68 // the Russian newspaper. 2013 December 13. Number 282.
11. Ismailov Ch.M. Reasonable time of criminal proceedings and the individual problems of its application // The Russian justice. Number 12. 2013. P.36.
12. Ishchenko E.P., Toporkov A.A. Forensics. Textbook. Ed. 2nd, rev., Ext. and rev. Ed. EP Ishchenko. Moscow, INFRA-M, CONTRACT, 2010. — 784 p.
13. Koldin A.V. Procedural issues forensic investigation of sources of information: avftoref. Dis.... Cand..nauk jurid. — Nizhny Novgorod, 2005. — p.25.
14. The newest philosophical dictionary. A.A. Gritsanov. — Minsk: The Book House, 1999.
15. Novikov S.A. Indications of the accused in a criminal trial of Russia: problems of admissibility // The Russian justice. Number 2. 2014. P.43.
16. Rules of interaction of operators due to the authorized state bodies, engaged in the operational-search activities. Approved. Russian Federation Government Resolution dated August 27, 2005 №538 (ed. of 10 April 2013) // Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 2005. №36. Art. 3704.
17. Semenov O.I. Information. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://victor-safronov.ru/systems-analysis/glossary/information.html (reference date: March 20, 2016).
18. Shannon C. Works on information theory and cybernetics. — M.: Foreign Literature, 1963. — 830 p.
About this article
Author: Stelmah V.Yu.
Year: 2016
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|