|
|
|
Popov V.B. POLITICAL PARTIES AND POWER IN THE EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY. RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE LEGAL FIELD (ON THE EXAMPLE OF ORENBURG PROVINCE)Wave of the revolution of 1905 caused by the failure to resolve the pressing issues of development of the state and society, has forced the government to embark on the path of dialogue. Freedom given by Nicholas II gave the opposition a legal matter, however, the authoritarian practices of the monarchical government, being entirely focused on the neutralization of the social forces, the lack of tradition of collaboration gave rise to mutually. The low level of political consciousness is not only the common masses, but also among intellectuals, officials, appeared in the period of the legalization of political parties: affected by the lack of democratic traditions, the General low level of education among the population, including many members of the military class. At the same time on the background of frequent offences committed by members of the leftist parties, the assassination of government officials, theft of state property, and so on, acquired monstrous proportions in the country in General and in the Urals, in particular, the region was relatively quiet. Despite this repression has fallen not only on the radical left organizations and associations, and representatives of the Constitutional-democratic party. Although compared to the very left, "cadet" opposition behaved in relation to the state loyally and quite correctly, however, all of this for the government was doubtful. Power, establishing the legal framework for the opposition, sometimes broke them, for the sake of immediate political gain, and sometimes bungling at the local level. In General, attributing all the opposition is equally unlawful tendencies, not wanting to understand all the nuances, nuances, been oppressed and was underestimated truly necessary for the country liberals. Moreover, the attitude of authorities to the parties of the opposition did not differ. It is no coincidence that brought to trial against the "cadets" as witnesses police "habit" claimed "found during a search of the documents of the social Democrats". Thus, the relationship of the parties and the authorities on the national level and in the Orenburg province in particular, both before and after the Manifesto of 17 October 1905, can be described as mutually hostile (except the far right) that gave rise eventually 1917.Key words: Orenburg province, opposition, political parties, left, power.
References:
1. Gaoo. F. 10. Op.1. D. 248/1. L. 56об.
2. Gaoo. F. 10. Op. 1. 278/1 etc. L. 54об., 62.
3. Lenin, V. I. the Persecutors of the Zemstvo liberalism and Annibale // Lenin, V. I. Poln. SOBR. op. — T. 5. — M., 1972. — P. 65.
4. Bolshov, V. V. Kohanovskiy Commission (1881 — 1885): on the internal politics of autocracy in the first half of XIX century: dis. ...candidate. East. Sciences / V. V. Bolshov. — M., 1981. — S. 30.
5. Gaoo. F. 183.Op.1. D. 2. About L. 74,75;
6. SARF. F. 523. Op.2. D. 1.L. 31.
7. Gaoo. F. 21. op. 5, 23. L. 29.
8. Essays on the history of the Orenburg regional organization of the CPSU. — Chelyabinsk: South.-Uralsk. kN. publishing house, 1983.
9. Nara, I. V. Political parties in the Urals (1901-1916 years): dis. ... d-RA ist. Sciences / I. V. Nara. — Chelyabinsk, 1995. S. — 156.
10. CDNIA. F. 6002, op.1, d. 620. L. 5 — 6.
11. Zlobin, Y. P. Union of working class and working peasants — the decisive force of the October victory in the civil war in the South Urals / P. Zlobin. — Orenburg, 1987. — P. 160.
12. Gaoo. F. 31. Op. 1. D. 1.L. 17.
13. The Orenburg region. — 1908. — On September 17.
14. Gaoo. F. 21. Op. 2. D. 277.L. 2.
15. Gaoo. F. 21. Op.2. D. 349.L. 5.
16. Narskiy, I.V. Political parties in the Urals (1901-1916 years): dis. ... d-RA ist. Sciences / I.V. Narskiy. — Chelyabinsk, 1995. — P. 193.
About this article
Author: Popov V.B.
Year: 2016
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|