Vestnik On-line
Orenburg State University april 25, 2024 š RU/EN
Headings of Vestnik
Pedagogics
Psychology
Other

Search
Vak
áÎÔÉÐÌÁÇÉÁÔ
Orcid
Viniti
üâó ìÁÎØ
Rsl
ìÉÃÅÎÚÉÑ Creative Commons

2015, №š12š(187)



Zabolotniy A.G., Misakiyan K.S., Bronskaya A.N., Simonova A.N., Khristichenko E.Yu. METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS AND ANALYSIS OF THE INEFFECTIVENESS OF THE IMPLANT IN THE SOFT DRAIN PRIMARY PENETRATING SURGERY BEFORE OPERATED OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA STAGE I–IIIScarring of the newly formed outflow tract for intraocular fluid (IOF)š— the main cause of IOP decompensation after surgery. For S prevention and reduction a slowly absorbable "soft" drainage implant HealaFlow (Anteis, Switzerland) was applied. Analysis of the implant HealaFlow results in the filtering anti-glaucoma operations (FAGO) of non-penetrating type for patients with POAG of I–III stages. Materials and methods. 30špatients (30šeyes), 18šmen, 12šwomen, 54–76šyears. 5špatients with IIIšstage were previously operated on for glaucoma. The follow-up period was more than 3šmonths. Research methods included optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the anterior and posterior eye segment [VisanteTM OCT, RTVue Avanti (Optovue)]. In all cases stabilization of IOPš— 16–18šmm Hg was achieved. There were no surgical complications. At discharge, on the OCT in the operational area in 29špatients was determined diffuse intraconjunctival cavity (ICC). Intrascleral cavity (ISC) was apposed to ICC filled with HealaFlow. 1špatient (IOP of 29šmmšHg) was performed a revision of a surgery area. 1–3šmonths after surgery in all eyes a bleb with height of 0.6–0.8šmm with subconjunctival micro cavities was visualized. ISC in all patients was saved. All patients with POAG of III stage was underwent DGP up to 3šmonths. The purpose IOP was achieved in 86š% of cases. Implant HealaFlow when FAGO of non-penetrating type with POAG of I–IIIšstages, including repeated, prevents the formation of cicatrical processes. Persistent hypotensive effect was achieved. It requires strict technology observance. Key words: innovations in ophthalmology, glaucoma surgery, drainage implants.

Download
References:

1. Balashevich L.I., Naumenko V.I., Belova L.V. Penetrating deep sclerectomy with intrascleral microdrainage in the surgical treatment of patients with primary open angle glaucoma. Tutorial.š— St. Peterburg, 2000.š— P.12.

2. Danilichev V.F. The pathology of the eye. Enzymes and Inhibitorsš— St. Peterburg, 1996.š— P. 235.

3. Egorov E.A., Astakhov Y.S., Shuko A.G. National guidelines for glaucoma: for medical practitioners.M .: GEOTAR Media 2011.š— P. 280.

4. Egorova E.V., Kozlova E.E., Eremenko I.L., Shormaz I.N. Optimization of reparative processes in the structures of the drainage system after MNGSE early after surgery // Practical Medicine.š— 2013.š— № 1-3.š— P. 39-41.

5. Egorova E.V., Eremenko I.L., Opletina A.V., Uzunyan D.G. Ultrasound biomicroscopy formed drainage outflow tract after surgery neperforiruyuschego type with drain implant // Bulletin SB RAMS.š— 2014.š— № 3.š— Volume 34.š— P. 114-118.

6. Zabolotniy A.G., Moiseeva L.I., Tereshchenko E.A. NSAIDsš— medical factor in increasing operational efficiency and clinical effectiveness of non-penetrating type of surgery for primary open-angle glaucoma // "V Euro-Asian Conference on ophthalmology": Coll. scientific works scientific-practical conferenceš— Ekaterinburg, 2009.š— P. 123-124.

7. Ivanova E.S. Application of cytostatics in glaucoma surgery // Perspective trends in the surgical treatment of glaucoma Coll. Scien. Art. M.: IRTC "Eye Microsurgery", 1997.š— P. 43-46.

8. Slonimsky A.Y., Alekseev I.B., Long S.S. New in preventing excessive scarring in glaucoma surgery // Ophthalmologyš— 2012.š— T. 9,š— №3.š— P. 36-40.

9. Takhchidi Kh.P., Egorova E.V., Uzunyan D.G. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in the diagnosis of diseases of the anterior segment of the eye.š— M.: Eye Microsurgery, 2008.š— P. 67-76.

10. Fedorov S.N., Kozlov V.I., Timoshkina N.T. et all. Penetrating deep sclerectomy at open-angle glaucoma // Ophthalmosurgery.š— 1989.š— № 3-4.š— P. 52-55.

11. Fokin V.P., EV Abrosimov E.V., Szczawa A.I. Experience of the drainage implant surgery HealaFlow in primary open angle glaucoma // Herald VolgGMU.š— 2014.š— №3. P. 73-75.

12. Khodzhaev N.S., Uzunyan D.G. Studies of morphological structures of the filter area after penetrating deep sclerectomy by ultrasound biomicroscopy // Innovative Technologies medicine of the 21st century. Medical Computer Technologies: Proc. scientific. Forum: Materials.š— M., 2005.š— P. 535-537.

13. Foscarini B.; Bergin C.; Sharkawi E. A Comparative Study Between Crosslinked Sodium Hyaluronate (healaflow Glaucoma Implant) And High Molecular Weight Sodium Hyaluronate (healon 5) As Subconjunctival Spacers Injected Into Failed Filtration Blebs During Needling With MMC // Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, №3. P. 2506.

14. Roy S., Thi. H., Mermoud A. Crosslinked sodium hyaluronate implant in deep sclerectomy for the surgical treatment of glaucoma // Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2012. 22. (1). ò. 70-76.

15. Shaarawy T., Nguyen C., Schnyder C., Mermoud A. Comparative study between deep sclerectomy with and without collagen implant: long term follow up // Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2004.š— Vol. 88.š— P. 95-98.


About this article

Authors: Hristichenko E.Yu., Misakyan K.S., Zabolotniy A.G., Bronskaya A.N., Simonova A.N.

Year: 2015


Editor-in-chief
Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

Crossref
Cyberleninka
Doi
Europeanlibrary
Googleacademy
scienceindex
worldcat
¿ üÌÅËÔÒÏÎÎÏÅ ÐÅÒÉÏÄÉÞÅÓËÏÅ ÉÚÄÁÎÉÅ: ÷åóôîéë ïçõ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
úÁÒÅÇÉÓÔÒÉÒÏ×ÁÎÏ × æÅÄÅÒÁÌØÎÏÊ ÓÌÕÖÂÅ ÐÏ ÎÁÄÚÏÒÕ × ÓÆÅÒÅ Ó×ÑÚÉ, ÉÎÆÏÒÍÁÃÉÏÎÎÙÈ ÔÅÈÎÏÌÏÇÉÊ É ÍÁÓÓÏ×ÙÈ ËÏÍÍÕÎÉËÁÃÉÊ
ó×ÉÄÅÔÅÌØÓÔ×Ï Ï ÒÅÇÉÓÔÒÁÃÉÉ óíé: üÌ № æó77-37678 ÏÔ 29 ÓÅÎÔÑÂÒÑ 2009 Ç.
õÞÒÅÄÉÔÅÌØ: ïÒÅÎÂÕÒÇÓËÉÊ ÇÏÓÕÄÁÒÓÔ×ÅÎÎÙÊ ÕÎÉ×ÅÒÓÉÔÅÔ (ïçõ)
çÌÁ×ÎÙÊ ÒÅÄÁËÔÏÒ: ó.á. íÉÒÏÛÎÉËÏ×
áÄÒÅÓ ÒÅÄÁËÃÉÉ: 460018, Ç. ïÒÅÎÂÕÒÇ, ÐÒÏÓÐÅËÔ ðÏÂÅÄÙ, Ä. 13, Ë. 2335
ôÅÌ./ÆÁËÓ: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru
1999–2024 ¿ CIT OSU