|
|
|
Lunina A.N. TASK-DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH TO THE ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGES OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF PEDAGOGICAL THINKINGThis article actualizes problem of development of the pedagogic thinking for students and graduates. The author notices the significance of ways and methods for development of thinking. The article gives results of investigation that was made for detection of student knowledge about the pedagogic thinking and ways it's developments. In the beginning the author describes problem of development of the pedagogic thinking. The researcher gives examples of some methods and ways of development creative thinking: brainstorming, the method of empathy, the method of inversion, "I — concept" of the creative self-development of students and others. Then the article gives results of investigation that was made for detection of student knowledge about the pedagogic thinking and methods of it's developments. As a result, the author recognizes that students have low level of knowledge about different type of thinking and ways of thinking development. The most difficult thinking for description is reflective thinking. The researcher supposes that using task-diagnostic approach in the learning process will increase quality of education. There are examples of pedagogic tasks аnd description of conclusion of one these tasks in the article. This conclusion presumes using some types of thinking at one time. The author concludes that we must attend to development of different types of thinking in learning process, and use more methods and ways of thinking development too. Key words: task, creative thinking, reflective thinking, systems thinking, prognostic thinking, critical thinking, ways and methods of thinking development.
References:
1. Alimov, A.T. Development of independent and creative thinking of students in the learning process./A.T.Alimov, I.B.Savrieva//Molodoi uchenyu. — 2014. — №1. — P. 468-470. URL: http://moluch.ru/archive/60/8663
2. Andreev, V.I. Pedagogy of higher education. Innovative-prognostic course./V.I.Andreev. — Kazan: Tsentr innovatsionnykh tekhnologiy, 2013. — 500 p.
3. Altshuller, G.S. Creativity as an exact science/G.S. Altshuller. — Petrozavodsk:Skandinaviya, 2004. — 208 p.
4. Dozmorova, E.V. Means of creative thinking development question at the lesson og mathematics in a few complement school./E.V.Dozmorova, E.G.Gelfman//Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. — 209. — №12 — P. 93-96
5. Dewey, J. Psychology and pedagogy of thinking. How we think./ translation from English by N.M.Nikolskaya. — M.:Sovershenstvo,1997. — 208 p.
6. Lyashko, E.N. Integration of pedagogical conditions for the development of systems thinking of students — future teacher: work of candidate of pedagogical sciences:13.00.01/Lyashko Evgeniya Nikolayevna — Kazan, 2009. — 196 p.
7. Norpulatov, H.A. Active learning methods which develop independent and creative thinking of students./H.A.Norpulatov// Molodoi uchenyu. — 2012.- №1.T.2 — P.112-116. URL:http://moluch.ru/archive/36/4140
8. Sadykova, A.R. Formation or reflective thinking of students in the study of science subjects in technical colleges: work of candidate of pedagogical sciences:13.00.08/Sadykova Albina Rifovna. — M.,2005. — 147 p.
9. Halpern, D. Psychology of critical thinking./ translation from English by N.Malgina, S.Rysev, L.Tsaruk. — SPb.:Piter, 2000. — 512 p.
10.Esaulov, A.F. Psychology of tasks solving./ A.F.Esaulov. — M.:Visshaya shkola, 1972. — 216 p.
About this article
Author:
Year: 2015
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|