Teligisova S.S. PROCEDURAL STATUS OF THE INVESTIGATOR AS THE SUBJECT OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RELATIONSThe article considers the current criminal procedure law. Analizpokazal that procedural autonomy is clearly limited by the investigator and may lead to a depersonalization of the procedural shapes, reducing the prestige of the profession and the loss of this category of lawyers.Key words: Investigator, criminal procedure, the prestige of the profession, the figure of the procedural
References:
1. Gromov NA, Lisovenko VV Creek RE An investigator in the criminal process. / / Investigator. Number 4. In 2008. a. 15.
2. Andrei A. Selected Works / AP Guskov. — 2nd ed., Ext. — Orenburg: Publishing Center of Gray, 2008. — 740 p.
3. Larin AM Procedural safeguards, and the function of criminal prosecution. / / Sov. State and law. In 2005. Number 7. a. 95.
4. Larin AM The criminal investigation: the procedural functions. M. Yur.lit. In 2006. a. 12, 38
5. Mariupol, LA, Holst, GR On the procedural functions of an investigator. / / Sov. State and law. In 2003. Number 6. a. 114.
6. Najimov VP On criminal procedure functions. / / Legal. In 2003. Number 5. a. 75.
7. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. — MM: Brochure, KnoRus, 2011. — 256 p.
8. Criminal procedure / Dictionary / / Ed. VM Savitsky. _ M., — 1999. _ With. 180
9. Szymanowski V. On the procedural functions of an investigator in the Soviet criminal procedure. / / Legal. In 2005. Number 2. a. 175-176.
10. Yacoub, ML The concept of procedural functions in the Soviet criminal proceedings. / / Legal. In 2003. Number 5. a. 83.
About this article
Author: Teligisova S.S.
Year: 2012
|